Re: [OE-core] [oe][meta-oe][PATCH 2/4] xterm: add latest version of xterm

2013-04-11 Thread Marco
Il 11/04/2013 00:53, Denys Dmytriyenko ha scritto: On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 06:44:21PM -0400, Trevor Woerner wrote: On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 2:10 PM, Marco wrote: Yes, it is copied from meta-openembedded into oe-core I'm sorry, I thought the [meta-oe] in the subject line implied this patch was

Re: [OE-core] [oe][meta-oe][PATCH 2/4] xterm: add latest version of xterm

2013-04-11 Thread Marco
Il 10/04/2013 21:43, Mark Hatle ha scritto: Yes, it is copied from meta-openembedded into oe-core Then you should fix commit message too * Recipe taken from oe-classic In all recipes you sent to oe-core. See: http://openembedded.org/wiki/Commit_Patch_Message_Guidelines Specifically the

Re: [OE-core] [oe][meta-oe][PATCH 2/4] xterm: add latest version of xterm

2013-04-10 Thread Denys Dmytriyenko
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 06:44:21PM -0400, Trevor Woerner wrote: > On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 2:10 PM, Marco wrote: > > Yes, it is copied from meta-openembedded into oe-core > > I'm sorry, I thought the [meta-oe] in the subject line implied this > patch was destined for meta-openembedded, not coming

Re: [OE-core] [oe][meta-oe][PATCH 2/4] xterm: add latest version of xterm

2013-04-10 Thread Trevor Woerner
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 2:10 PM, Marco wrote: > Yes, it is copied from meta-openembedded into oe-core I'm sorry, I thought the [meta-oe] in the subject line implied this patch was destined for meta-openembedded, not coming from meta-openembedded. It seems rather confusing that both openembedded-

Re: [OE-core] [oe][meta-oe][PATCH 2/4] xterm: add latest version of xterm

2013-04-10 Thread Mark Hatle
On 4/10/13 2:36 PM, Martin Jansa wrote: On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 08:10:11PM +0200, Marco wrote: Il 10/04/2013 18:56, Trevor Woerner ha scritto: This whole thread has me thoroughly confused. Isn't xterm_277.bb already part of meta-openembedded? $ find . -name "*xterm*" -pri

Re: [OE-core] [oe][meta-oe][PATCH 2/4] xterm: add latest version of xterm

2013-04-10 Thread Martin Jansa
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 08:10:11PM +0200, Marco wrote: > Il 10/04/2013 18:56, Trevor Woerner ha scritto: > > This whole thread has me thoroughly confused. Isn't xterm_277.bb > > already part of meta-openembedded? > > > > $ find . -name "*xterm*" -print > > ./meta-openembedded/

Re: [OE-core] [oe][meta-oe][PATCH 2/4] xterm: add latest version of xterm

2013-04-10 Thread Marco
Il 10/04/2013 18:56, Trevor Woerner ha scritto: This whole thread has me thoroughly confused. Isn't xterm_277.bb already part of meta-openembedded? $ find . -name "*xterm*" -print ./meta-openembedded/meta-oe/recipes-graphics/xorg-app/xterm_277.bb And

Re: [OE-core] [oe][meta-oe][PATCH 2/4] xterm: add latest version of xterm

2013-04-10 Thread Trevor Woerner
This whole thread has me thoroughly confused. Isn't xterm_277.bb already part of meta-openembedded? $ find . -name "*xterm*" -print ./meta-openembedded/meta-oe/recipes-graphics/xorg-app/xterm_277.bb And from what I can tell, it was added over a year ago by Koen: $ git log meta-oe/recipes-graphic

Re: [OE-core] [oe][meta-oe][PATCH 2/4] xterm: add latest version of xterm

2013-04-09 Thread Koen Kooi
Op 9 apr. 2013, om 21:06 heeft Martin Jansa het volgende geschreven: > On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 08:01:21PM +0200, Koen Kooi wrote: >> >> Op 9 apr. 2013, om 19:46 heeft Martin Jansa het >> volgende geschreven: >> >>> On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 03:26:58PM +0100, Burton, Ross wrote: On 9 Apri

Re: [OE-core] [oe][meta-oe][PATCH 2/4] xterm: add latest version of xterm

2013-04-09 Thread Martin Jansa
On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 08:01:21PM +0200, Koen Kooi wrote: > > Op 9 apr. 2013, om 19:46 heeft Martin Jansa het > volgende geschreven: > > > On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 03:26:58PM +0100, Burton, Ross wrote: > >> On 9 April 2013 15:21, Marco Cavallini wrote: > >>> * Recipe taken from oe-classic > >>

Re: [OE-core] [oe][meta-oe][PATCH 2/4] xterm: add latest version of xterm

2013-04-09 Thread Koen Kooi
Op 9 apr. 2013, om 19:46 heeft Martin Jansa het volgende geschreven: > On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 03:26:58PM +0100, Burton, Ross wrote: >> On 9 April 2013 15:21, Marco Cavallini wrote: >>> * Recipe taken from oe-classic >>> * Required by xinput-calibrator >> >> oe-core already ships not one but

Re: [OE-core] [oe][meta-oe][PATCH 2/4] xterm: add latest version of xterm

2013-04-09 Thread Martin Jansa
On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 03:26:58PM +0100, Burton, Ross wrote: > On 9 April 2013 15:21, Marco Cavallini wrote: > > * Recipe taken from oe-classic > > * Required by xinput-calibrator > > oe-core already ships not one but two terminal emulators, let's not > add another one. Can we make this confi

Re: [OE-core] [oe][meta-oe][PATCH 2/4] xterm: add latest version of xterm

2013-04-09 Thread Burton, Ross
On 9 April 2013 15:21, Marco Cavallini wrote: > * Recipe taken from oe-classic > * Required by xinput-calibrator oe-core already ships not one but two terminal emulators, let's not add another one. Can we make this configurable in the recipe somehow and default to use matchbox-terminal (which

[OE-core] [oe][meta-oe][PATCH 2/4] xterm: add latest version of xterm

2013-04-09 Thread Marco Cavallini
* Recipe taken from oe-classic * Required by xinput-calibrator Signed-off-by: Marco Cavallini --- meta/recipes-graphics/xorg-app/xterm_277.bb | 23 +++ 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+) create mode 100644 meta/recipes-graphics/xorg-app/xterm_277.bb diff --git a/meta/recipe