On 23 May 2013 03:50, Chris Larson wrote:
> On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 3:14 AM, Phil Blundell wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, 2013-05-22 at 09:47 +0100, Paul Barker wrote:
>> > I've just sent a patch to the yocto@ list to fix this but it's brought
>> > up two things:
>> >
>> > 1) In openembedded-core/meta/clas
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 3:14 AM, Phil Blundell wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-05-22 at 09:47 +0100, Paul Barker wrote:
> > I've just sent a patch to the yocto@ list to fix this but it's brought
> > up two things:
> >
> > 1) In openembedded-core/meta/classes/image.bbclass SPLASH is set with
> > '?='. I'm o
On Wed, 2013-05-22 at 09:47 +0100, Paul Barker wrote:
> I've just sent a patch to the yocto@ list to fix this but it's brought
> up two things:
>
> 1) In openembedded-core/meta/classes/image.bbclass SPLASH is set with
> '?='. I'm overriding this with '=' in
> meta-raspberrypi/conf/machine/raspberr
On Wednesday 22 May 2013 11:17:38 Martin Jansa wrote:
> On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 09:47:39AM +0100, Paul Barker wrote:
> > I've just sent a patch to the yocto@ list to fix this but it's brought
> > up two things:
> >
> > 1) In openembedded-core/meta/classes/image.bbclass SPLASH is set with
> > '?='.
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 09:47:39AM +0100, Paul Barker wrote:
> On 16 May 2013 00:02, Paul Barker wrote:
> > On 15 May 2013 21:33, Richard Purdie
> > wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> (e.g. when I include
> >> meta-raspberrypi, it changes the psplash logo, regardless of whether I'm
> >> building for the pi).
On 16 May 2013 00:02, Paul Barker wrote:
> On 15 May 2013 21:33, Richard Purdie
> wrote:
>
>>
>> (e.g. when I include
>> meta-raspberrypi, it changes the psplash logo, regardless of whether I'm
>> building for the pi).
>>
>> In many ways the bbappend is too easy and encourages anti-social
>> beh
On Thu, 2013-05-16 at 11:29 +0200, Martin Jansa wrote:
> On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 10:10:45AM +0100, Paul Eggleton wrote:
> > On Thursday 16 May 2013 10:59:54 Martin Jansa wrote:
> > > On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 09:29:48AM +0100, Paul Eggleton wrote:
> > > > On Thursday 16 May 2013 08:31:33 Koen Kooi wr
On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 10:10:45AM +0100, Paul Eggleton wrote:
> On Thursday 16 May 2013 10:59:54 Martin Jansa wrote:
> > On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 09:29:48AM +0100, Paul Eggleton wrote:
> > > On Thursday 16 May 2013 08:31:33 Koen Kooi wrote:
> > > > Removing layers is pretty much impossible, though.
On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 09:37:23AM +0100, Paul Eggleton wrote:
> On Thursday 16 May 2013 08:23:35 Koen Kooi wrote:
> > Op 15 mei 2013, om 22:33 heeft Richard Purdie
> > het volgende geschreven:
> > > On Tue, 2013-05-14 at 09:36 +0200, Koen Kooi wrote:
> > >> 2) *Never* use PRINC in type b) bbappen
On Thursday 16 May 2013 10:59:54 Martin Jansa wrote:
> On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 09:29:48AM +0100, Paul Eggleton wrote:
> > On Thursday 16 May 2013 08:31:33 Koen Kooi wrote:
> > > Removing layers is pretty much impossible, though.
> >
> > With PRINC gone would there be any other issue that would mak
On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 09:29:48AM +0100, Paul Eggleton wrote:
> On Thursday 16 May 2013 08:31:33 Koen Kooi wrote:
> > The flip side is that adding BSP layers becomes a lot safer. I don't mind
> > adding layers. Adding layers is easy.
>
> For distros like Angstrom it is, yes, as I said above.
>
>
On Thursday 16 May 2013 08:23:35 Koen Kooi wrote:
> Op 15 mei 2013, om 22:33 heeft Richard Purdie
> het volgende geschreven:
> > On Tue, 2013-05-14 at 09:36 +0200, Koen Kooi wrote:
> >> 2) *Never* use PRINC in type b) bbappends
> >> 3) Avoid PRINC in general
> >
> > Could we undergo some mass pur
On Thursday 16 May 2013 08:31:33 Koen Kooi wrote:
> Op 15 mei 2013, om 16:44 heeft Paul Eggleton
> het volgende geschreven:
> > On Tuesday 14 May 2013 09:36:02 Koen Kooi wrote:
> >> What triggered PR going backwards this time was a BSP removing its
> >> netbase
> >> bbappend because it wasn't need
Op 15 mei 2013, om 16:44 heeft Paul Eggleton
het volgende geschreven:
> Hi Koen,
>
> On Tuesday 14 May 2013 09:36:02 Koen Kooi wrote:
>> What triggered PR going backwards this time was a BSP removing its netbase
>> bbappend because it wasn't needed anymore. That's great, I hate netbase
>> bbap
Op 15 mei 2013, om 22:33 heeft Richard Purdie
het volgende geschreven:
> On Tue, 2013-05-14 at 09:36 +0200, Koen Kooi wrote:
>> To avoid things like that in the future I have a few recommendations
>> I'd like to get feedback on:
>
> In future can we please discuss this on the oe-core list or a
On 15 May 2013 21:33, Richard Purdie wrote:
>
> (e.g. when I include
> meta-raspberrypi, it changes the psplash logo, regardless of whether I'm
> building for the pi).
>
> In many ways the bbappend is too easy and encourages anti-social
> behaviour. I would recommend bouncing meta-rpi as being no
On Tue, 2013-05-14 at 09:36 +0200, Koen Kooi wrote:
> To avoid things like that in the future I have a few recommendations
> I'd like to get feedback on:
In future can we please discuss this on the oe-core list or at least
give a heads up there as this is pretty key to the core of the project
and
17 matches
Mail list logo
