On 12 February 2013 21:53, Eric Bénard wrote:
> if you have a how-to to get Qt/E 4.x working with evdev, please send it
> before removing tslib so that we can test it on several boards which
> are actually running with Qt/E+tslib.
Totally, not regressing badly is a prerequisite.
Ross
__
Hi Ross,
Le Tue, 12 Feb 2013 21:36:16 +,
"Burton, Ross" a écrit :
> On 12 February 2013 21:22, Martin Jansa wrote:
> > Yes, xf86-input-tslib works
> > http://git.openembedded.org/meta-openembedded/commit/?id=506d5f781f5ee93e3c9b8ca51a7fb65f40d4a8b8
>
> [ surprised face ]
>
> You totally s
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 7:36 PM, Burton, Ross wrote:
> On 12 February 2013 21:22, Martin Jansa wrote:
>> Yes, xf86-input-tslib works
>> http://git.openembedded.org/meta-openembedded/commit/?id=506d5f781f5ee93e3c9b8ca51a7fb65f40d4a8b8
>
> [ surprised face ]
>
> You totally should push those tarbal
On 12 February 2013 21:22, Martin Jansa wrote:
> Yes, xf86-input-tslib works
> http://git.openembedded.org/meta-openembedded/commit/?id=506d5f781f5ee93e3c9b8ca51a7fb65f40d4a8b8
[ surprised face ]
You totally should push those tarballs to a git repo on fd.o,
pengutronix has clearly abandoned it.
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 08:51:25PM +, Burton, Ross wrote:
> On 12 February 2013 16:43, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> >> Qt Embedded as we build it is currently configured to use tslib, as is
> >> SDL. If the alternative (evdev?) is supported they could presumably be
> >> switched over though. I don
On 12 February 2013 16:43, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>> Qt Embedded as we build it is currently configured to use tslib, as is
>> SDL. If the alternative (evdev?) is supported they could presumably be
>> switched over though. I don't know how practical that is however.
>
> Yes Qt Embedded uses it; no
On 2/12/13 1:32 PM, Chris Larson wrote:
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 12:19 PM, Martin Jansa mailto:martin.ja...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> * meta-oe/recipes-qt/qt4/qt4-x11-free_4.8.4.bbappend
> * meta-oe/recipes-qt/qt4/qt4-embedded_4.8.4.bbappend
> These two add MySQL and PostgreSQL support
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 12:19 PM, Martin Jansa wrote:
> > * meta-oe/recipes-qt/qt4/qt4-x11-free_4.8.4.bbappend
> > * meta-oe/recipes-qt/qt4/qt4-embedded_4.8.4.bbappend
> > These two add MySQL and PostgreSQL support to Qt and Qt/Embedded. I see
> this
> > as a distro policy decision; these should m
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 5:19 PM, Martin Jansa wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 05:09:01PM +, Paul Eggleton wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I'd like to make an attempt to remove all appends and overlayed recipes from
>> the meta-oe layer. As I've said previously, I don't believe meta-oe - as a
>> colle
On Tuesday 12 February 2013 14:44:58 Otavio Salvador wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 1:50 PM, Ross Burton wrote:
> > On Tuesday, 12 February 2013 at 10:24, Burton, Ross wrote:
> >> > * meta-oe/recipes-extended/polkit/polkit_0.104.bbappend
> >> > Another bbappend apparently for systemd support. Ag
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 1:50 PM, Ross Burton wrote:
> On Tuesday, 12 February 2013 at 10:24, Burton, Ross wrote:
>> > * meta-oe/recipes-extended/polkit/polkit_0.104.bbappend
>> > Another bbappend apparently for systemd support. Again, this should have
>> > been
>> > moved to meta-systemd; do we n
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 8:38 AM, Paul Eggleton
wrote:
> On Tuesday 12 February 2013 10:24:50 Burton, Ross wrote:
>> > * tslib: OE-Core has the 1.0 release version, meta-oe has a git recipe
>> > that is ahead of 1.0; the OE-Core version has two patches not in the
>> > meta-oe version but that both
On Tuesday, 12 February 2013 at 10:24, Burton, Ross wrote:
> > * meta-oe/recipes-extended/polkit/polkit_0.104.bbappend
> > Another bbappend apparently for systemd support. Again, this should have
> > been
> > moved to meta-systemd; do we now need to merge it into OE-Core?
>
>
> Yes, half of it h
On Tuesday 12 February 2013 10:24:50 Burton, Ross wrote:
> > * tslib: OE-Core has the 1.0 release version, meta-oe has a git recipe
> > that is ahead of 1.0; the OE-Core version has two patches not in the
> > meta-oe version but that both have been merged upstream in the git
> > revision being used
On 11 February 2013 17:09, Paul Eggleton wrote:
> I'd like to make an attempt to remove all appends and overlayed recipes from
> the meta-oe layer. As I've said previously, I don't believe meta-oe - as a
> collection of very useful additional recipes that many wish to be able to use
> on top of th
15 matches
Mail list logo