On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 01:58:35PM -0500, Mark Hatle wrote:
Let me preface this by I have read the patch set.. Martin asked me to comment
on
the items below...
On 9/27/12 3:37 AM, Martin Jansa wrote:
On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 06:45:44PM +0100, Richard Purdie wrote:
On Sat, 2012-09-22 at
On 10/2/12 1:43 PM, Martin Jansa wrote:
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 01:58:35PM -0500, Mark Hatle wrote:
Let me preface this by I have read the patch set.. Martin asked me to comment on
the items below...
On 9/27/12 3:37 AM, Martin Jansa wrote:
On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 06:45:44PM +0100, Richard
On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 03:36:16PM -0500, Mark Hatle wrote:
On 10/2/12 1:43 PM, Martin Jansa wrote:
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 01:58:35PM -0500, Mark Hatle wrote:
Let me preface this by I have read the patch set.. Martin asked me to
comment on
the items below...
On 9/27/12 3:37 AM,
On 10/2/12 3:38 PM, Martin Jansa wrote:
On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 03:36:16PM -0500, Mark Hatle wrote:
On 10/2/12 1:43 PM, Martin Jansa wrote:
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 01:58:35PM -0500, Mark Hatle wrote:
Let me preface this by I have read the patch set.. Martin asked me to comment on
the items
On Thu, 2012-09-27 at 13:58 -0500, Mark Hatle wrote:
I've been an advocate for a while that the processor optimization (CCARGS)
does
make it into the PKGARCH. ARMPKGSFX_CPU seems like a reasonable approach to
do
this. It allows each tune to set something to tell people what that binary
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 12:02:50PM +0100, Phil Blundell wrote:
On Thu, 2012-09-27 at 13:58 -0500, Mark Hatle wrote:
I've been an advocate for a while that the processor optimization (CCARGS)
does
make it into the PKGARCH. ARMPKGSFX_CPU seems like a reasonable approach
to do
this.
On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 06:45:44PM +0100, Richard Purdie wrote:
On Sat, 2012-09-22 at 18:51 +0200, Martin Jansa wrote:
* bitbake.conf has OPTDEFAULTTUNE with weak default value of DEFAULTTUNE
* this way xscale or arm926ejs is not used by default when some machine
includes its tune*.inc,
Let me preface this by I have read the patch set.. Martin asked me to comment on
the items below...
On 9/27/12 3:37 AM, Martin Jansa wrote:
On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 06:45:44PM +0100, Richard Purdie wrote:
On Sat, 2012-09-22 at 18:51 +0200, Martin Jansa wrote:
* bitbake.conf has OPTDEFAULTTUNE
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 01:58:35PM -0500, Mark Hatle wrote:
Let me preface this by I have read the patch set.. Martin asked me to comment
on
the items below...
On 9/27/12 3:37 AM, Martin Jansa wrote:
On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 06:45:44PM +0100, Richard Purdie wrote:
On Sat, 2012-09-22 at
On 9/27/12 2:12 PM, Martin Jansa wrote:
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 01:58:35PM -0500, Mark Hatle wrote:
Let me preface this by I have read the patch set.. Martin asked me to comment on
the items below...
On 9/27/12 3:37 AM, Martin Jansa wrote:
On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 06:45:44PM +0100, Richard
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 02:18:07PM -0500, Mark Hatle wrote:
On 9/27/12 2:12 PM, Martin Jansa wrote:
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 01:58:35PM -0500, Mark Hatle wrote:
Let me preface this by I have read the patch set.. Martin asked me to
comment on
the items below...
On 9/27/12 3:37 AM,
* bitbake.conf has OPTDEFAULTTUNE with weak default value of DEFAULTTUNE
* this way xscale or arm926ejs is not used by default when some machine
includes its tune*.inc, but it's easy for DISTRO to say it wants
OPTDEFAULTTUNE for some packages or always (if they don't want to
share built
On Sat, 2012-09-22 at 18:51 +0200, Martin Jansa wrote:
* bitbake.conf has OPTDEFAULTTUNE with weak default value of DEFAULTTUNE
* this way xscale or arm926ejs is not used by default when some machine
includes its tune*.inc, but it's easy for DISTRO to say it wants
OPTDEFAULTTUNE for some
13 matches
Mail list logo
