Re: [OE-core] [poky][dunfell][PATCH] lighttpd: Add patch for reuse large memory chunks

2021-08-17 Thread Steve Sakoman
On Thu, Aug 12, 2021 at 9:56 PM Purushottam choudhary wrote: > > Added 0001-core-reuse-large-mem-chunks-fix-mem-usage-fixes-3033.patch > to fix large memory usage for large file downloads > from dynamic backends reuse or release large memory chunks. > > This issue is caused by a bug in the

Re: [OE-core] [poky][dunfell][PATCH] lighttpd: Add patch for reuse large memory chunks

2021-08-17 Thread purushottamc
Hi Steve, could you please check again? -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#154872): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/154872 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/84836400/21656 Group Owner:

[OE-core] [poky][dunfell][PATCH] lighttpd: Add patch for reuse large memory chunks

2021-08-13 Thread Purushottam choudhary
Added 0001-core-reuse-large-mem-chunks-fix-mem-usage-fixes-3033.patch to fix large memory usage for large file downloads from dynamic backends reuse or release large memory chunks. This issue is caused by a bug in the lighttpd 1.4.55 version and has been fixed in lighttpd 1.4.58. Hence, it is not

Re: [OE-core] [poky][dunfell][PATCH] lighttpd: Add patch for reuse large memory chunks

2021-08-12 Thread Steve Sakoman
Your patch doesn't apply to dunfell head: Applying: lighttpd: Add patch for reuse large memory chunks Using index info to reconstruct a base tree... error: patch failed: meta/recipes-extended/lighttpd/lighttpd/0001-Use-pkg-config-for-pcre-dependency-instead-of-config.patch:6 error:

Re: [OE-core] [poky][dunfell][PATCH] lighttpd: Add patch for reuse large memory chunks

2021-08-12 Thread purushottamc
Hi, Could you please check again. I have fixed the fuzz error. -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#154740): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/154740 Mute This Topic:

[OE-core] [poky][dunfell][PATCH] lighttpd: Add patch for reuse large memory chunks

2021-08-12 Thread Purushottam choudhary
Added 0001-core-reuse-large-mem-chunks-fix-mem-usage-fixes-3033.patch to fix large memory usage for large file downloads from dynamic backends reuse or release large memory chunks. This issue is caused by a bug in the lighttpd 1.4.55 version and has been fixed in lighttpd 1.4.58. Hence, it is not

Re: [OE-core] [poky][dunfell][PATCH] lighttpd: Add patch for reuse large memory chunks

2021-08-09 Thread Steve Sakoman
This version of the patch is still throwing warnings on the autobuilder: stdio: WARNING: lighttpd-1.4.55-r0 do_patch: Fuzz detected: stdio: WARNING: lighttpd-1.4.55-r0 do_patch: QA Issue: Patch log indicates that patches do not apply cleanly. [patch-fuzz] Steve On Sun, Aug 8, 2021 at 9:20 PM

[OE-core] [poky][dunfell][PATCH] lighttpd: Add patch for reuse large memory chunks

2021-08-09 Thread Purushottam choudhary
Added 0001-core-reuse-large-mem-chunks-fix-mem-usage-fixes-3033.patch to fix large memory usage for large file downloads from dynamic backends reuse or release large memory chunks. This issue is caused by a bug in the lighttpd 1.4.55 version and has been fixed in lighttpd 1.4.58. Hence, it is not

Re: [OE-core] [poky][dunfell][PATCH] lighttpd: Add patch for reuse large memory chunks

2021-08-06 Thread Steve Sakoman
On Thu, Aug 5, 2021 at 8:55 PM Purushottam choudhary wrote: > > Added 0001-core-reuse-large-mem-chunks-fix-mem-usage-fixes-3033.patch > to fix large memory usage for large file downloads > from dynamic backends reuse or release large memory chunks. > > This issue is caused by a bug in the

[OE-core] [poky][dunfell][PATCH] lighttpd: Add patch for reuse large memory chunks

2021-08-06 Thread Purushottam choudhary
Added 0001-core-reuse-large-mem-chunks-fix-mem-usage-fixes-3033.patch to fix large memory usage for large file downloads from dynamic backends reuse or release large memory chunks. This issue is caused by a bug in the lighttpd 1.4.55 version and has been fixed in lighttpd 1.4.58. Hence, it is not