Re: [OE-core] [poky] Proposed Multilib Implementation Brainstorming

2011-04-06 Thread Richard Purdie
On Wed, 2011-04-06 at 09:08 +0200, Esben Haabendal wrote: > Richard Purdie writes: > > > One of the items on our post 1.0 schedule is multilib and we need a plan > > of implementation. I've been thinking about this for a while and at > > least have some ideas how some of the issues can be handled

Re: [OE-core] [poky] Proposed Multilib Implementation Brainstorming

2011-04-06 Thread Esben Haabendal
Richard Purdie writes: > On Wed, 2011-04-06 at 09:08 +0200, Esben Haabendal wrote: >> Richard Purdie writes: >> >> > One of the items on our post 1.0 schedule is multilib and we need a plan >> > of implementation. I've been thinking about this for a while and at >> > least have some ideas how s

Re: [OE-core] [poky] Proposed Multilib Implementation Brainstorming

2011-04-06 Thread Richard Purdie
On Wed, 2011-04-06 at 14:16 +0200, Esben Haabendal wrote: > Richard Purdie writes: > > > On Wed, 2011-04-06 at 09:08 +0200, Esben Haabendal wrote: > >> Richard Purdie writes: > >> > >> > One of the items on our post 1.0 schedule is multilib and we need a plan > >> > of implementation. I've been

Re: [OE-core] [poky] Proposed Multilib Implementation Brainstorming

2011-04-06 Thread Esben Haabendal
Richard Purdie writes: > On Wed, 2011-04-06 at 14:16 +0200, Esben Haabendal wrote: >> Richard Purdie writes: >> >> > On Wed, 2011-04-06 at 09:08 +0200, Esben Haabendal wrote: >> >> Richard Purdie writes: >> >> >> >> > One of the items on our post 1.0 schedule is multilib and we need a plan >>

Re: [OE-core] [poky] Proposed Multilib Implementation Brainstorming

2011-04-06 Thread Richard Purdie
On Wed, 2011-04-06 at 15:21 +0200, Esben Haabendal wrote: > Richard Purdie writes: > > > On Wed, 2011-04-06 at 14:16 +0200, Esben Haabendal wrote: > > I actually believe the core in OE is well suited to multilib support and > > using it will show off some of the power in the OE architecture as I

Re: [OE-core] [poky] Proposed Multilib Implementation Brainstorming

2011-04-06 Thread Esben Haabendal
Richard Purdie writes: > On Wed, 2011-04-06 at 15:21 +0200, Esben Haabendal wrote: >> Richard Purdie writes: >> >> > On Wed, 2011-04-06 at 14:16 +0200, Esben Haabendal wrote: >> > I actually believe the core in OE is well suited to multilib support and >> > using it will show off some of the po

Re: [OE-core] [poky] Proposed Multilib Implementation Brainstorming

2011-04-06 Thread Hatle, Mark
On Apr 6, 2011, at 5:06 AM, "Richard Purdie" wrote: > On Wed, 2011-04-06 at 09:08 +0200, Esben Haabendal wrote: >> Richard Purdie writes: >> >>> One of the items on our post 1.0 schedule is multilib and we need a plan >>> of implementation. I've been thinking about this for a while and at

Re: [OE-core] [poky] Proposed Multilib Implementation Brainstorming

2011-04-06 Thread Hatle, Mark
On Apr 6, 2011, at 7:29 AM, "Richard Purdie" wrote: > On Wed, 2011-04-06 at 10:47 +0200, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote: >> I think most embedded systems would only use one lib. To take your >> lib/lib64 example: >> If I am developing for an embedded system I know whether it will run >> as 32 or 6

Re: [OE-core] [poky] Proposed Multilib Implementation Brainstorming

2011-04-06 Thread Esben Haabendal
"Hatle, Mark" writes: > On Apr 6, 2011, at 5:06 AM, "Richard Purdie" > wrote: > >> On Wed, 2011-04-06 at 09:08 +0200, Esben Haabendal wrote: >>> Richard Purdie writes: >>> One of the items on our post 1.0 schedule is multilib and we need a plan of implementation. I've been thinking

Re: [OE-core] [poky] Proposed Multilib Implementation Brainstorming

2011-04-06 Thread Esben Haabendal
"Hatle, Mark" writes: > On Apr 6, 2011, at 5:06 AM, "Richard Purdie" > wrote: > >> On Wed, 2011-04-06 at 09:08 +0200, Esben Haabendal wrote: >>> Richard Purdie writes: >>> One of the items on our post 1.0 schedule is multilib and we need a plan of implementation. I've been thinking

Re: [OE-core] [poky] Proposed Multilib Implementation Brainstorming

2011-04-07 Thread Colin Walters
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 7:02 AM, Richard Purdie wrote: > One of the items on our post 1.0 schedule is multilib and we need a plan > of implementation. I've been thinking about this for a while and at > least have some ideas how some of the issues can be handled. > > In case anyone isn't familiar wi

Re: [OE-core] [poky] Proposed Multilib Implementation Brainstorming

2011-04-07 Thread Hatle, Mark
On Apr 7, 2011, at 8:36 AM, "Colin Walters" wrote: > On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 7:02 AM, Richard Purdie > wrote: >> One of the items on our post 1.0 schedule is multilib and we need a plan >> of implementation. I've been thinking about this for a while and at >> least have some ideas how some of

Re: [OE-core] [poky] Proposed Multilib Implementation Brainstorming

2011-04-07 Thread Colin Walters
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 12:10 PM, Hatle, Mark wrote: > > I think definition may be an issue here.  When I speak of multilibs I am > talking primarily about multiliple non-conflicting, ABI incompatible > libraries being installed at the same time.  This is the ELF 32 and ELF 64 > case where the i

Re: [OE-core] [poky] Proposed Multilib Implementation Brainstorming

2011-04-07 Thread Hatle, Mark
On Apr 7, 2011, at 9:53 AM, "Colin Walters" wrote: > On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 12:10 PM, Hatle, Mark wrote: >> >> I think definition may be an issue here. When I speak of multilibs I am >> talking primarily about multiliple non-conflicting, ABI incompatible >> libraries being installed at t

Re: [OE-core] [poky] Proposed Multilib Implementation Brainstorming

2011-04-07 Thread Koen Kooi
Op 7 apr 2011, om 18:53 heeft Colin Walters het volgende geschreven: > On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 12:10 PM, Hatle, Mark wrote: >> >> I think definition may be an issue here. When I speak of multilibs I am >> talking primarily about multiliple non-conflicting, ABI incompatible >> libraries being

Re: [OE-core] [poky] Proposed Multilib Implementation Brainstorming

2011-04-07 Thread Hatle, Mark
Sorry to reply to myself but I forgot one thing.. On Apr 7, 2011, at 10:05 AM, "Hatle, Mark" wrote: > > > > > On Apr 7, 2011, at 9:53 AM, "Colin Walters" wrote: > >> On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 12:10 PM, Hatle, Mark >> wrote: >>> >>> I think definition may be an issue here. When I speak o