Re: [OE-core] [poky] Proposed Multilib Implementation Brainstorming

2011-04-07 Thread Colin Walters
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 12:10 PM, Hatle, Mark mark.ha...@windriver.com wrote: I think definition may be an issue here.  When I speak of multilibs I am talking primarily about multiliple non-conflicting, ABI incompatible libraries being installed at the same time.  This is the ELF 32 and ELF

Re: [OE-core] [poky] Proposed Multilib Implementation Brainstorming

2011-04-07 Thread Hatle, Mark
Sorry to reply to myself but I forgot one thing.. On Apr 7, 2011, at 10:05 AM, Hatle, Mark mark.ha...@windriver.com wrote: On Apr 7, 2011, at 9:53 AM, Colin Walters walt...@verbum.org wrote: On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 12:10 PM, Hatle, Mark mark.ha...@windriver.com wrote: I think

Re: [OE-core] [poky] Proposed Multilib Implementation Brainstorming

2011-04-06 Thread Richard Purdie
On Wed, 2011-04-06 at 09:08 +0200, Esben Haabendal wrote: Richard Purdie richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org writes: One of the items on our post 1.0 schedule is multilib and we need a plan of implementation. I've been thinking about this for a while and at least have some ideas how some

Re: [OE-core] [poky] Proposed Multilib Implementation Brainstorming

2011-04-06 Thread Esben Haabendal
Richard Purdie richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org writes: On Wed, 2011-04-06 at 09:08 +0200, Esben Haabendal wrote: Richard Purdie richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org writes: One of the items on our post 1.0 schedule is multilib and we need a plan of implementation. I've been thinking

Re: [OE-core] [poky] Proposed Multilib Implementation Brainstorming

2011-04-06 Thread Richard Purdie
On Wed, 2011-04-06 at 14:16 +0200, Esben Haabendal wrote: Richard Purdie richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org writes: On Wed, 2011-04-06 at 09:08 +0200, Esben Haabendal wrote: Richard Purdie richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org writes: One of the items on our post 1.0 schedule is multilib

Re: [OE-core] [poky] Proposed Multilib Implementation Brainstorming

2011-04-06 Thread Esben Haabendal
Richard Purdie richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org writes: On Wed, 2011-04-06 at 14:16 +0200, Esben Haabendal wrote: Richard Purdie richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org writes: On Wed, 2011-04-06 at 09:08 +0200, Esben Haabendal wrote: Richard Purdie richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org writes:

Re: [OE-core] [poky] Proposed Multilib Implementation Brainstorming

2011-04-06 Thread Richard Purdie
On Wed, 2011-04-06 at 15:21 +0200, Esben Haabendal wrote: Richard Purdie richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org writes: On Wed, 2011-04-06 at 14:16 +0200, Esben Haabendal wrote: I actually believe the core in OE is well suited to multilib support and using it will show off some of the power

Re: [OE-core] [poky] Proposed Multilib Implementation Brainstorming

2011-04-06 Thread Esben Haabendal
Richard Purdie richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org writes: On Wed, 2011-04-06 at 15:21 +0200, Esben Haabendal wrote: Richard Purdie richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org writes: On Wed, 2011-04-06 at 14:16 +0200, Esben Haabendal wrote: I actually believe the core in OE is well suited to

Re: [OE-core] [poky] Proposed Multilib Implementation Brainstorming

2011-04-06 Thread Hatle, Mark
On Apr 6, 2011, at 7:29 AM, Richard Purdie richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org wrote: On Wed, 2011-04-06 at 10:47 +0200, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote: I think most embedded systems would only use one lib. To take your lib/lib64 example: If I am developing for an embedded system I know whether

Re: [OE-core] [poky] Proposed Multilib Implementation Brainstorming

2011-04-06 Thread Esben Haabendal
Hatle, Mark mark.ha...@windriver.com writes: On Apr 6, 2011, at 5:06 AM, Richard Purdie richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org wrote: On Wed, 2011-04-06 at 09:08 +0200, Esben Haabendal wrote: Richard Purdie richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org writes: One of the items on our post 1.0 schedule