On Mon, 2020-07-27 at 09:05 -0700, akuster808 wrote:
>
> On 7/27/20 7:47 AM, Richard Purdie wrote:
> > On Mon, 2020-07-27 at 06:57 -0700, akuster808 wrote:
> > > On 7/27/20 2:39 AM, Richard Purdie wrote:
> > > > On Sun, 2020-07-26 at 19:52 -0700, akuster wrote:
> > > > > If the "tmp/cve_check"
On 7/27/20 7:47 AM, Richard Purdie wrote:
> On Mon, 2020-07-27 at 06:57 -0700, akuster808 wrote:
>> On 7/27/20 2:39 AM, Richard Purdie wrote:
>>> On Sun, 2020-07-26 at 19:52 -0700, akuster wrote:
If the "tmp/cve_check" file was not create as in the case for -c
populate_sdk, just print
On Mon, 2020-07-27 at 06:57 -0700, akuster808 wrote:
>
> On 7/27/20 2:39 AM, Richard Purdie wrote:
> > On Sun, 2020-07-26 at 19:52 -0700, akuster wrote:
> > > If the "tmp/cve_check" file was not create as in the case for -c
> > > populate_sdk, just print a
> > > warning instead of dumping a trace
On 7/27/20 2:39 AM, Richard Purdie wrote:
> On Sun, 2020-07-26 at 19:52 -0700, akuster wrote:
>> If the "tmp/cve_check" file was not create as in the case for -c
>> populate_sdk, just print a
>> warning instead of dumping a trace back
>>
>> ---
>> v2] lets include the missing part of the patch
On Sun, 2020-07-26 at 19:52 -0700, akuster wrote:
> If the "tmp/cve_check" file was not create as in the case for -c
> populate_sdk, just print a
> warning instead of dumping a trace back
>
> ---
> v2] lets include the missing part of the patch
>
> Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster
> ---
>
If the "tmp/cve_check" file was not create as in the case for -c populate_sdk,
just print a
warning instead of dumping a trace back
---
v2] lets include the missing part of the patch
Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster
---
meta/classes/cve-check.bbclass | 4
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff
