> On Nov 23, 2017, at 12:25 PM, Leonardo Sandoval
> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 23 Nov 2017 12:48:32 -0700
> Tim Orling wrote:
>
>> I stand corrected. When I try to apply the mbox file from patchwork it
>> throws:
>>
>> error: patch fragment without header at line 147: @@ -172,6 +172,10 @@
>> SUMM
On Thu, 23 Nov 2017 12:48:32 -0700
Tim Orling wrote:
> I stand corrected. When I try to apply the mbox file from patchwork it throws:
>
> error: patch fragment without header at line 147: @@ -172,6 +172,10 @@
> SUMMARY_${PN}-png
>
I stand corrected. When I try to apply the mbox file from patchwork it throws:
error: patch fragment without header at line 147: @@ -172,6 +172,10 @@
SUMMARY_${PN}-png
util="Python package extension utility support”
I just manually applied the entire series on top of openembedded-core master,
so this is definitely a false positive.
> On Nov 23, 2017, at 12:10 PM, Tim Orling
> wrote:
>
> This seems like a false positive, as this series is based on top of master?
>
> Is it expecting master for “poky” or ma
This seems like a false positive, as this series is based on top of master?
Is it expecting master for “poky” or master for “openembedded-core”?
> On Nov 23, 2017, at 11:37 AM, Patchwork
> wrote:
>
> == Series Details ==
>
> Series: Add pypi.bbclass; python improvements
> Revision: 1
> URL
== Series Details ==
Series: Add pypi.bbclass; python improvements
Revision: 1
URL : https://patchwork.openembedded.org/series/9940/
State : failure
== Summary ==
Thank you for submitting this patch series to OpenEmbedded Core. This is
an automated response. Several tests have been executed o
