On 9/11/12 8:48 AM, Martin Jansa wrote:
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 03:01:55PM +0200, Martin Jansa wrote:
Hi,
when building spitz and qemuarm (both produces packages in armv5te feed)
resulting packages are tuned with -mtune=xscale (when built for spitz)
or -mtune=arm926ej-s (when built for qemuarm)
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 10:51:40AM -0500, Mark Hatle wrote:
> On 9/11/12 8:48 AM, Martin Jansa wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 03:01:55PM +0200, Martin Jansa wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> when building spitz and qemuarm (both produces packages in armv5te feed)
> >> resulting packages are tuned with
On 9/11/12 10:59 AM, Martin Jansa wrote:
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 10:51:40AM -0500, Mark Hatle wrote:
On 9/11/12 8:48 AM, Martin Jansa wrote:
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 03:01:55PM +0200, Martin Jansa wrote:
Hi,
when building spitz and qemuarm (both produces packages in armv5te feed)
resulting pac
Op 11 sep. 2012, om 17:51 heeft Mark Hatle het
volgende geschreven:
> On 9/11/12 8:48 AM, Martin Jansa wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 03:01:55PM +0200, Martin Jansa wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> when building spitz and qemuarm (both produces packages in armv5te feed)
>>> resulting packages are tun
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 11:09:53AM -0500, Mark Hatle wrote:
> On 9/11/12 10:59 AM, Martin Jansa wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 10:51:40AM -0500, Mark Hatle wrote:
> >> On 9/11/12 8:48 AM, Martin Jansa wrote:
> >>> On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 03:01:55PM +0200, Martin Jansa wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 9:13 AM, Koen Kooi wrote:
> From a gcc point of view both are the same ISA, but using xscale will take in
> account the absurdly long pipeline on that SoC.
Not really, when you tune for XScale it will use ldrd/strd and pld if possible
On Tue, 2012-09-11 at 11:40 -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 9:13 AM, Koen Kooi wrote:
> > From a gcc point of view both are the same ISA, but using xscale will take
> > in account the absurdly long pipeline on that SoC.
>
> Not really, when you tune for XScale it will use ldrd/s
On (11/09/12 19:53), Phil Blundell wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-09-11 at 11:40 -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 9:13 AM, Koen Kooi
> > wrote:
> > > From a gcc point of view both are the same ISA, but using xscale will
> > > take in account the absurdly long pipeline on that SoC.
> >
