On 11-11-30 05:35 AM, Ulf Samuelsson wrote:
Is there a reason for using "patch" instead of "git am" on let's say the
kernel.
If I want to do some modification, of the kernel, I can like Graeme
description at
http://www.slimlogic.co.uk/2011/05/openembeddedangstrom-kernel-workflow/ do
bitbake -c c
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 3:35 AM, Ulf Samuelsson
wrote:
> Is there a reason for using "patch" instead of "git am" on let's say the
> kernel.
>
> If I want to do some modification, of the kernel, I can like Graeme
> description at
> http://www.slimlogic.co.uk/2011/05/openembeddedangstrom-kernel-work
Is there a reason for using "patch" instead of "git am" on let's say the
kernel.
If I want to do some modification, of the kernel, I can like Graeme
description at
http://www.slimlogic.co.uk/2011/05/openembeddedangstrom-kernel-workflow/
do
bitbake -c configure virtual/kernel
and then have
