On Wed, 2017-03-15 at 16:47 +0200, Ed Bartosh wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 04:01:43PM +0200, Ed Bartosh wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 02:41:34PM +0100, Patrick Ohly wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2017-03-15 at 14:39 +0100, Patrick Ohly wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 2017-03-15 at 14:58 +0200, Ed Bartosh
On Wed, 2017-03-15 at 16:01 +0200, Ed Bartosh wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 02:41:34PM +0100, Patrick Ohly wrote:
> > On Wed, 2017-03-15 at 14:39 +0100, Patrick Ohly wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2017-03-15 at 14:58 +0200, Ed Bartosh wrote:
> > > > Regarding do_rm_work. It should not touch rootfs
On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 04:01:43PM +0200, Ed Bartosh wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 02:41:34PM +0100, Patrick Ohly wrote:
> > On Wed, 2017-03-15 at 14:39 +0100, Patrick Ohly wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2017-03-15 at 14:58 +0200, Ed Bartosh wrote:
> > > > Regarding do_rm_work. It should not touch rootfs
On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 02:41:34PM +0100, Patrick Ohly wrote:
> On Wed, 2017-03-15 at 14:39 +0100, Patrick Ohly wrote:
> > On Wed, 2017-03-15 at 14:58 +0200, Ed Bartosh wrote:
> > > Regarding do_rm_work. It should not touch rootfs directories, I believe.
> >
> It does, and it should by default
On Wed, 2017-03-15 at 14:39 +0100, Patrick Ohly wrote:
> On Wed, 2017-03-15 at 14:58 +0200, Ed Bartosh wrote:
> > Regarding do_rm_work. It should not touch rootfs directories, I believe.
>
> It does, and it should by default because a rootfs can be quite large.
> If it's not going to be reused in
On Wed, 2017-03-15 at 14:58 +0200, Ed Bartosh wrote:
> Regarding do_rm_work. It should not touch rootfs directories, I believe.
It does, and it should by default because a rootfs can be quite large.
If it's not going to be reused in another recipe, then it is worthwhile
to remove it.
--
Best
On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 08:24:34AM +0100, Patrick Ohly wrote:
> On Tue, 2017-03-14 at 20:06 +0200, Ed Bartosh wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 06:49:45PM +0100, Patrick Ohly wrote:
> > >
> > > > It's not a big deal to run wic sequentially to produce multiple images,
> > > > but it will create
On Tue, 2017-03-14 at 20:06 +0200, Ed Bartosh wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 06:49:45PM +0100, Patrick Ohly wrote:
> >
> > > It's not a big deal to run wic sequentially to produce multiple images,
> > > but it will create more problems than it solves I believe. It will be
> > > slower and
> >
On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 06:49:45PM +0100, Patrick Ohly wrote:
>
> > It's not a big deal to run wic sequentially to produce multiple images,
> > but it will create more problems than it solves I believe. It will be
> > slower and
> > will make a mess in image naming in deploy directory.
>
> I
On Tue, 2017-03-14 at 19:11 +0200, Ed Bartosh wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 05:16:31PM +0100, Daniel Schultz wrote:
> > Do I have misunderstood the design of wic?
> >
> > I mean MMC and EMMC are very similar, but different in the
> > bootloader and it would be a overhead to create an extra
On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 05:16:31PM +0100, Daniel Schultz wrote:
>
>
> Am 08.03.2017 um 14:43 schrieb Ed Bartosh:
> >On Wed, Mar 08, 2017 at 02:41:10PM +0100, Gary Thomas wrote:
> >>On 2017-03-08 11:57, Ed Bartosh wrote:
> >>>On Wed, Mar 08, 2017 at 10:44:21AM +0100, Daniel Schultz wrote:
>
Am 08.03.2017 um 14:43 schrieb Ed Bartosh:
On Wed, Mar 08, 2017 at 02:41:10PM +0100, Gary Thomas wrote:
On 2017-03-08 11:57, Ed Bartosh wrote:
On Wed, Mar 08, 2017 at 10:44:21AM +0100, Daniel Schultz wrote:
Hi,
I created two kickstart files (am335x-sdimage.wks, am335x-emmc.wks)
and added
On Wed, Mar 08, 2017 at 02:41:10PM +0100, Gary Thomas wrote:
> On 2017-03-08 11:57, Ed Bartosh wrote:
> >On Wed, Mar 08, 2017 at 10:44:21AM +0100, Daniel Schultz wrote:
> >>Hi,
> >>
> >>I created two kickstart files (am335x-sdimage.wks, am335x-emmc.wks)
> >>and added them to the local.conf.
> >>
>
On 2017-03-08 11:57, Ed Bartosh wrote:
On Wed, Mar 08, 2017 at 10:44:21AM +0100, Daniel Schultz wrote:
Hi,
I created two kickstart files (am335x-sdimage.wks, am335x-emmc.wks)
and added them to the local.conf.
When I build the image only the first wks in WKS_FILES will be used
by WIC and the
On Wed, Mar 08, 2017 at 10:44:21AM +0100, Daniel Schultz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I created two kickstart files (am335x-sdimage.wks, am335x-emmc.wks)
> and added them to the local.conf.
>
> When I build the image only the first wks in WKS_FILES will be used
> by WIC and the second will be ignored. Is it
Hi,
I created two kickstart files (am335x-sdimage.wks, am335x-emmc.wks) and
added them to the local.conf.
When I build the image only the first wks in WKS_FILES will be used by
WIC and the second will be ignored. Is it possible to build two images
in one build?
Includes of the wks files
16 matches
Mail list logo