Re: [OE-core] GStreamer 0.10's future

2014-05-10 Thread Khem Raj
On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 7:48 AM, Burton, Ross wrote: > For the 1.7 release I want to move GStreamer 0.10 from oe-core into > meta-multimedia, and ensure everything in oe-core has ported to > GStreamer 1.x. GStreamer 0.10 is considered dead upstream and is > unmaintained so we don't need to be ship

Re: [OE-core] GStreamer 0.10's future

2014-05-08 Thread Tim Orling
> On May 8, 2014, at 8:07 AM, Paul Eggleton > wrote: > >> On Thursday 08 May 2014 15:48:40 Burton, Ross wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> Sorry for the cross-post but I want this to have a wide audience. >> >> For the 1.7 release I want to move GStreamer 0.10 from oe-core into >> meta-multimedia, and

Re: [OE-core] GStreamer 0.10's future

2014-05-08 Thread Burton, Ross
On 8 May 2014 15:48, Burton, Ross wrote: > For the 1.7 release I want to move GStreamer 0.10 from oe-core into > meta-multimedia, and ensure everything in oe-core has ported to > GStreamer 1.x. GStreamer 0.10 is considered dead upstream and is > unmaintained so we don't need to be shipping both v

Re: [OE-core] GStreamer 0.10's future

2014-05-08 Thread Koen Kooi
Op 8 mei 2014, om 16:48 heeft Burton, Ross het volgende geschreven: > Hi all, > > Sorry for the cross-post but I want this to have a wide audience. > > For the 1.7 release I want to move GStreamer 0.10 from oe-core into > meta-multimedia, and ensure everything in oe-core has ported to > GStre

Re: [OE-core] GStreamer 0.10's future

2014-05-08 Thread Burton, Ross
On 8 May 2014 16:11, Carlos Rafael Giani wrote: > I suppose it wouldn't be possible to rename the recipes as well? It would be > cleaner to have them adopt the GStreamer 1.0 recipe naming convention. So, > for example, no more gst-plugins-bad_1.0.23.bb , but > gstreamer0.10-plugins-bad_1.0.23.bb f

Re: [OE-core] GStreamer 0.10's future

2014-05-08 Thread Carlos Rafael Giani
On 2014-05-08 16:48, Burton, Ross wrote: Hi all, Sorry for the cross-post but I want this to have a wide audience. For the 1.7 release I want to move GStreamer 0.10 from oe-core into meta-multimedia, and ensure everything in oe-core has ported to GStreamer 1.x. GStreamer 0.10 is considered dea

Re: [OE-core] GStreamer 0.10's future

2014-05-08 Thread Burton, Ross
On 8 May 2014 16:07, Paul Eggleton wrote: > The next question is does that mean for the "old" libav (which gst-ffmpeg > depends upon), do we move that as well or drop it? If gst-ffmpeg is the sole consumer, then certainly yes. Ross -- ___ Openembedded

Re: [OE-core] GStreamer 0.10's future

2014-05-08 Thread Paul Eggleton
On Thursday 08 May 2014 15:48:40 Burton, Ross wrote: > Hi all, > > Sorry for the cross-post but I want this to have a wide audience. > > For the 1.7 release I want to move GStreamer 0.10 from oe-core into > meta-multimedia, and ensure everything in oe-core has ported to > GStreamer 1.x. GStreame

[OE-core] GStreamer 0.10's future

2014-05-08 Thread Burton, Ross
Hi all, Sorry for the cross-post but I want this to have a wide audience. For the 1.7 release I want to move GStreamer 0.10 from oe-core into meta-multimedia, and ensure everything in oe-core has ported to GStreamer 1.x. GStreamer 0.10 is considered dead upstream and is unmaintained so we don't