Op 6 apr 2011, om 20:25 heeft Tom Rini het volgende geschreven:
On 04/06/2011 01:47 AM, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote:
2011/4/5 Richard Purdie richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org:
[...]
Does this make sense to everyone, are there any questions/ objections/
concerns/ things I've missed?
I
Richard Purdie richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org writes:
One of the items on our post 1.0 schedule is multilib and we need a plan
of implementation. I've been thinking about this for a while and at
least have some ideas how some of the issues can be handled.
Does this make sense to
Op 5 apr 2011, om 13:02 heeft Richard Purdie het volgende geschreven:
One of the items on our post 1.0 schedule is multilib and we need a plan
of implementation. I've been thinking about this for a while and at
least have some ideas how some of the issues can be handled.
In case anyone
2011/4/5 Richard Purdie richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org:
[...]
Does this make sense to everyone, are there any questions/ objections/
concerns/ things I've missed?
I think most embedded systems would only use one lib. To take your
lib/lib64 example:
If I am developing for an embedded
On Wed, 2011-04-06 at 10:47 +0200, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote:
I think most embedded systems would only use one lib. To take your
lib/lib64 example:
If I am developing for an embedded system I know whether it will run
as 32 or 64 bit, so there is no need to have both.
I agree that this is the
On 04/06/2011 01:47 AM, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote:
2011/4/5 Richard Purdie richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org:
[...]
Does this make sense to everyone, are there any questions/ objections/
concerns/ things I've missed?
I think most embedded systems would only use one lib. To take your
A few comments to the original proposal below...
On Apr 5, 2011, at 2:24 PM, Richard Purdie
richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
One of the items on our post 1.0 schedule is multilib and we need a plan
of implementation. I've been thinking about this for a while and at
least have some
On 04/06/2011 11:26 AM, Hatle, Mark wrote:
A few comments to the original proposal below...
On Apr 5, 2011, at 2:24 PM, Richard Purdie
richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
[snip]
and all the multilib class would need to do is to manipulation of
variables including OVERRIDES in a
On Tue, 2011-04-05 at 16:28 -0700, Jeremy Puhlman wrote:
To do this I'm thinking of a new set of include files of the form
conf/machine/include/multilib-.inc, similar in nature to the
tune-xxx.inc files. A given setup would include each of the multilibs it
requred. Each multilib
To do this I'm thinking of a new set of include files of the form
conf/machine/include/multilib-.inc, similar in nature to the
tune-xxx.inc files. A given setup would include each of the multilibs it
requred. Each multilib include file would look something like:
10 matches
Mail list logo
