Re: [OE-core] RRECOMMENDS "masking" unsatisfiable IMAGE_INSTALL

2021-07-28 Thread Alex Stewart
On 7/26/21 8:48 AM, Rasmus Villemoes wrote: Looking at log.do_rootfs, it seems that opkg gets invoked in exactly the same way with and without the RRECOMMENDS in play: With RRECOMMENDS, where the build succeeds: NOTE: Installing the following packages: [...] glib-2.0 iproute2 kernel-image ker

Re: [OE-core] RRECOMMENDS "masking" unsatisfiable IMAGE_INSTALL

2021-07-26 Thread Rasmus Villemoes via lists.openembedded.org
On 06/07/2021 21.39, Alex Stewart wrote: > Hey Rasmus, > > Sorry for the delay; I was OOO for the holidays and I'm just now working > through my inbox. No need to apologize; as it happens I've just now returned from vacation. > On 6/28/21 4:17 AM, Rasmus Villemoes wrote: >> On 25/06/2021 18.13,

Re: [OE-core] RRECOMMENDS "masking" unsatisfiable IMAGE_INSTALL

2021-07-06 Thread Alex Stewart
On 7/6/21 3:12 PM, Richard Purdie wrote: Kernel modules can be: a) not built at all b) built into the kernel3 c) built as separate packages For OE, where something needs a kernel module, we suggest people: RRECOMMEND_XXX += "kernel-module-xxx" and the kernel recipe has PACKAGES_DYNAMIC = "ker

Re: [OE-core] RRECOMMENDS "masking" unsatisfiable IMAGE_INSTALL

2021-07-06 Thread Richard Purdie
On Tue, 2021-07-06 at 14:39 -0500, Alex Stewart wrote: > Hey Rasmus, > > Sorry for the delay; I was OOO for the holidays and I'm just now working > through my inbox. > > On 6/28/21 4:17 AM, Rasmus Villemoes wrote: > > On 25/06/2021 18.13, Richard Purdie wrote: > > > That is probably a bug that n

Re: [OE-core] RRECOMMENDS "masking" unsatisfiable IMAGE_INSTALL

2021-07-06 Thread Alex Stewart
Hey Rasmus, Sorry for the delay; I was OOO for the holidays and I'm just now working through my inbox. On 6/28/21 4:17 AM, Rasmus Villemoes wrote: On 25/06/2021 18.13, Richard Purdie wrote: That is probably a bug that needs opening against opkg in bugzilla then. Added Alex to Cc: (opkg maint

Re: [OE-core] RRECOMMENDS "masking" unsatisfiable IMAGE_INSTALL

2021-06-28 Thread Richard Purdie
On Mon, 2021-06-28 at 11:17 +0200, Rasmus Villemoes wrote: > On 25/06/2021 18.13, Richard Purdie wrote: > > On Fri, 2021-06-25 at 17:45 +0200, Rasmus Villemoes wrote: > > > On 25/06/2021 14.16, Richard Purdie wrote: > > > > On Fri, 2021-06-25 at 09:37 +0200, Rasmus Villemoes via > > > > lists.open

Re: [OE-core] RRECOMMENDS "masking" unsatisfiable IMAGE_INSTALL

2021-06-28 Thread Rasmus Villemoes via lists.openembedded.org
On 25/06/2021 18.13, Richard Purdie wrote: > On Fri, 2021-06-25 at 17:45 +0200, Rasmus Villemoes wrote: >> On 25/06/2021 14.16, Richard Purdie wrote: >>> On Fri, 2021-06-25 at 09:37 +0200, Rasmus Villemoes via >>> lists.openembedded.org wrote: I noticed that if I have an image recipe that say

Re: [OE-core] RRECOMMENDS "masking" unsatisfiable IMAGE_INSTALL

2021-06-25 Thread Richard Purdie
On Fri, 2021-06-25 at 17:45 +0200, Rasmus Villemoes wrote: > On 25/06/2021 14.16, Richard Purdie wrote: > > On Fri, 2021-06-25 at 09:37 +0200, Rasmus Villemoes via > > lists.openembedded.org wrote: > > > I noticed that if I have an image recipe that says > > > > > > IMAGE_INSTALL += "kernel-modul

Re: [OE-core] RRECOMMENDS "masking" unsatisfiable IMAGE_INSTALL

2021-06-25 Thread Rasmus Villemoes via lists.openembedded.org
On 25/06/2021 14.16, Richard Purdie wrote: > On Fri, 2021-06-25 at 09:37 +0200, Rasmus Villemoes via > lists.openembedded.org wrote: >> I noticed that if I have an image recipe that says >> >> IMAGE_INSTALL += "kernel-module-foo" >> >> it fails as expected when the kernel hasn't been built with CO

Re: [OE-core] RRECOMMENDS "masking" unsatisfiable IMAGE_INSTALL

2021-06-25 Thread Richard Purdie
On Fri, 2021-06-25 at 09:37 +0200, Rasmus Villemoes via lists.openembedded.org wrote: > I noticed that if I have an image recipe that says > > IMAGE_INSTALL += "kernel-module-foo" > > it fails as expected when the kernel hasn't been built with CONFIG_FOO=m. > > However, if at the same time some

[OE-core] RRECOMMENDS "masking" unsatisfiable IMAGE_INSTALL

2021-06-25 Thread Rasmus Villemoes via lists.openembedded.org
I noticed that if I have an image recipe that says IMAGE_INSTALL += "kernel-module-foo" it fails as expected when the kernel hasn't been built with CONFIG_FOO=m. However, if at the same time some other package which happens to get installed in the same image says RRECOMMENDS_${PN} += "kernel-mo