Re: [OE-core] Thoughts about bluez4 and bluez5

2013-07-29 Thread Saul Wold
On 07/28/2013 11:34 PM, Iorga, Cristian wrote: Back from the past!! -Original Message- From: Iorga, Cristian Sent: Friday, July 26, 2013 8:51 AM To: 'Saul Wold'; 'Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer'; Burton, Ross Subject: RE: Thoughts about bluez4 and bluez5 Hi Saul, Ross,

Re: [OE-core] Thoughts about bluez4 and bluez5

2013-07-29 Thread Iorga, Cristian
OK, thanks, will handle it this week. Regards, /Cristian -Original Message- From: Saul Wold [mailto:s...@linux.intel.com] Sent: Monday, July 29, 2013 9:40 AM To: Iorga, Cristian; 'Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer' Cc: Burton, Ross Subject: Re: Thoughts about bluez4 and

[OE-core] Thoughts about bluez4 and bluez5

2013-07-25 Thread Saul Wold
Cristi, Ross: There is currently a PREFERRED_PROVIDER issue with bluez4 and bluez5 and I am beginning to think we need to distinguish the libasound-module-bluez with libasound-module-bluez5. I am also seeing some areas where we might need a virtual/bluez to allow recipes to enable

Re: [OE-core] Thoughts about bluez4 and bluez5

2013-07-25 Thread Iorga, Cristian
Hi Saul, Ross, I think that for the time being libasound-module-bluez should be libasound-module-bluez5. We will get back to it after 1.5, when all components will be ready for BlueZ 5. On the second issue, can you please go into details? I am not following exactly. Regards, Cristian