On 07/28/2013 11:34 PM, Iorga, Cristian wrote:
Back from the past!!
-Original Message-
From: Iorga, Cristian
Sent: Friday, July 26, 2013 8:51 AM
To: 'Saul Wold'; 'Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer'; Burton, Ross
Subject: RE: Thoughts about bluez4 and bluez5
Hi Saul, Ross,
OK, thanks, will handle it this week.
Regards,
/Cristian
-Original Message-
From: Saul Wold [mailto:s...@linux.intel.com]
Sent: Monday, July 29, 2013 9:40 AM
To: Iorga, Cristian; 'Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer'
Cc: Burton, Ross
Subject: Re: Thoughts about bluez4 and
Cristi, Ross:
There is currently a PREFERRED_PROVIDER issue with bluez4 and bluez5 and
I am beginning to think we need to distinguish the
libasound-module-bluez with libasound-module-bluez5.
I am also seeing some areas where we might need a virtual/bluez to allow
recipes to enable
Hi Saul, Ross,
I think that for the time being libasound-module-bluez should be
libasound-module-bluez5.
We will get back to it after 1.5, when all components will be ready for BlueZ 5.
On the second issue, can you please go into details? I am not following exactly.
Regards,
Cristian