On Tue, 12 Mar 2024 at 02:57, Chen, Qi wrote:
>
> Packages + overrides are a very common way to configure/customize images.
>
> Take OE itself as an example, the sshd_config is a conffile for openssh, but
> in rootfs-postcommands.bbclass, it is customized.
> This means sshd_config might be
@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: [OE-core] Yocto rpm packages do not keep the modified CONFFILES
On Mon, 11 Mar 2024 at 11:09, Böszörményi Zoltán wrote:
> Yes, I am aware. But why not use the package manager's own features
> instead of adding a workaround?
Because I see it the opposite way: nor
On Mon, 11 Mar 2024 at 11:09, Böszörményi Zoltán wrote:
> Yes, I am aware. But why not use the package manager's
> own features instead of adding a workaround?
Because I see it the opposite way: noreplace in this case is a
workaround for a file name conflict between what the tool generates
and
2024. 03. 11. 10:37 keltezéssel, Alexander Kanavin írta:
On Mon, 11 Mar 2024 at 10:30, Böszörményi Zoltán wrote:
If you manually edit the file on target, you might as well
manually resolve which version you want after the update as both are
available regardless of whether (noreplace) was
On Mon, 11 Mar 2024 at 10:30, Böszörményi Zoltán wrote:
> > If you manually edit the file on target, you might as well
> > manually resolve which version you want after the update as both are
> > available regardless of whether (noreplace) was used or not. Or
> > perhaps merge the manual edits
2024. 03. 09. 17:39 keltezéssel, Alexander Kanavin írta:
I think (noreplace) flag only matters when the file has been manually
edited after rpm installation and its checksum diverges from what is
registered in rpm database. Which is not a common scenario in
embedded.
So from Yocto's POV it's
I think (noreplace) flag only matters when the file has been manually
edited after rpm installation and its checksum diverges from what is
registered in rpm database. Which is not a common scenario in
embedded. If you manually edit the file on target, you might as well
manually resolve which
On Fri, 2024-03-08 at 03:20 -0800, Zoltan Boszormenyi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just found out that if an updated package ships a modified
> configuration file, then the Yocto package upgrade does this:
>
> * rename the edited conffile to conffile.rpmsave
> * install the new, modified one from the
Hi,
I just found out that if an updated package ships a modified
configuration file, then the Yocto package upgrade does this:
* rename the edited conffile to conffile.rpmsave
* install the new, modified one from the package
instead of:
* keep the edited conffile intact
* install the new,
