On Wed, 2011-11-09 at 11:52 +, Richard Purdie wrote:
> I'm tempted to run the following over the metata to convert the
> bb.data.*Var(...,d) and similar expressions to the form d.*Var(...).
>
> Why? We get a lot of people doing copy, paste and edit of the code and
> this way, we'll increase th
On Wed, 2011-11-09 at 08:24 -0700, Chris Larson wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 7:59 AM, Darren Hart wrote:
> > Hi Richard,
> >
> > On 11/09/2011 03:52 AM, Richard Purdie wrote:
> >> I'm tempted to run the following over the metata to convert the
> >> bb.data.*Var(...,d) and similar expressions to
On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 7:59 AM, Darren Hart wrote:
> Hi Richard,
>
> On 11/09/2011 03:52 AM, Richard Purdie wrote:
>> I'm tempted to run the following over the metata to convert the
>> bb.data.*Var(...,d) and similar expressions to the form d.*Var(...).
>
> Oh yes please!
>
>>
>> Why? We get a lot
Hi Richard,
On 11/09/2011 03:52 AM, Richard Purdie wrote:
> I'm tempted to run the following over the metata to convert the
> bb.data.*Var(...,d) and similar expressions to the form d.*Var(...).
Oh yes please!
>
> Why? We get a lot of people doing copy, paste and edit of the code and
> this way
I'm tempted to run the following over the metata to convert the
bb.data.*Var(...,d) and similar expressions to the form d.*Var(...).
Why? We get a lot of people doing copy, paste and edit of the code and
this way, we'll increase the chances of them finding better examples.
I'm still looking at th
