Since updating this morning, it seems that oe-core master now requires
bitbake 1.13.1 to be installed. (I don't recall any discussion of that
change or the reasons for it, but no doubt they are good ones.)
I couldn't find a 1.13.1 tag (or in fact any tags after 1.12.0) in the
bitbake repository s
Op 10 jun 2011, om 16:09 heeft Phil Blundell het volgende geschreven:
> Since updating this morning, it seems that oe-core master now requires
> bitbake 1.13.1 to be installed. (I don't recall any discussion of that
> change or the reasons for it, but no doubt they are good ones.)
>
> I couldn'
On Fri, 2011-06-10 at 16:17 +0200, Koen Kooi wrote:
> Op 10 jun 2011, om 16:09 heeft Phil Blundell het volgende geschreven:
>
> > Since updating this morning, it seems that oe-core master now requires
> > bitbake 1.13.1 to be installed. (I don't recall any discussion of that
> > change or the rea
Using bitbake master from today, I'm now getting this error whenever I
try to do "bitbake -b anything.bb":
ERROR: Command execution failed: Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/home/pb/oe/bitbake/lib/bb/command.py", line 102, in
runAsyncCommand
commandmethod(self.cmds_async, self, optio
On Wed, 2011-06-29 at 16:11 +0100, Phil Blundell wrote:
> Also, it does seem that "bitbake -e -b ..." really is broken. I get:
>
> ERROR: Command execution failed: Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "/home/pb/oe/bitbake/lib/bb/command.py", line 102, in runAsyncCommand
> commandmethod
On Wed, 2011-08-10 at 11:48 +0100, Phil Blundell wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-06-29 at 16:11 +0100, Phil Blundell wrote:
> > Also, it does seem that "bitbake -e -b ..." really is broken. I get:
> >
> > ERROR: Command execution failed: Traceback (most recent call last):
> > File "/home/pb/oe/bitbake/li
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 11:48:33AM +0100, Phil Blundell wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-06-29 at 16:11 +0100, Phil Blundell wrote:
> > Also, it does seem that "bitbake -e -b ..." really is broken. I get:
> >
> > ERROR: Command execution failed: Traceback (most recent call last):
> > File "/home/pb/oe/bit
On Wed, 2011-08-10 at 14:26 +0100, Richard Purdie wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-08-10 at 11:48 +0100, Phil Blundell wrote:
> > On Wed, 2011-06-29 at 16:11 +0100, Phil Blundell wrote:
> > > Also, it does seem that "bitbake -e -b ..." really is broken. I get:
>
> I've posted a patch to fix this to the bitba
On Thu, 2011-08-11 at 08:44 +0200, Martin Jansa wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 11:48:33AM +0100, Phil Blundell wrote:
> > On Wed, 2011-06-29 at 16:11 +0100, Phil Blundell wrote:
> > > Also, it does seem that "bitbake -e -b ..." really is broken. I get:
> > >
> > > ERROR: Command execution faile
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 01:03:59PM +0100, Richard Purdie wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-08-11 at 08:44 +0200, Martin Jansa wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 11:48:33AM +0100, Phil Blundell wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2011-06-29 at 16:11 +0100, Phil Blundell wrote:
> > > > Also, it does seem that "bitbake -e -b ..
On Wed, 2011-06-29 at 15:48 +0100, Phil Blundell wrote:
> Using bitbake master from today, I'm now getting this error whenever I
> try to do "bitbake -b anything.bb":
Actually, it looks like I was just unlucky/unskilled in my choice of
recipes when I tested. It does in fact work for at least some
Op 29 jun 2011, om 16:54 heeft Phil Blundell het volgende geschreven:
> On Wed, 2011-06-29 at 15:48 +0100, Phil Blundell wrote:
>> Using bitbake master from today, I'm now getting this error whenever I
>> try to do "bitbake -b anything.bb":
>
> Actually, it looks like I was just unlucky/unskille
On Wed, 2011-06-29 at 16:55 +0200, Koen Kooi wrote:
> Op 29 jun 2011, om 16:54 heeft Phil Blundell het volgende geschreven:
>
> > On Wed, 2011-06-29 at 15:48 +0100, Phil Blundell wrote:
> >> Using bitbake master from today, I'm now getting this error whenever I
> >> try to do "bitbake -b anything.
On Wed, 2011-06-29 at 16:07 +0100, Phil Blundell wrote:
> It seems that the main problem I was having was that (coincidentally in
> light of the earlier gst discussion) the recipe I was trying to build
> was unluckily named and being skipped because base.bbclass thought I
> wasn't licensed to use i
14 matches
Mail list logo