On Thu, 2012-02-09 at 06:22 +, Lu, Lianhao wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> I just found that the gcc-runtime-nativesdk has different task signature for
> task do_patch, comparing to that of gcc-cross-initial. This would cause a
> do_patch failure if we use OEBasicHash as the BB_SIGNATURE_HANDLER. By
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 10:22 PM, Lu, Lianhao wrote:
> I'm wondering if it is a correct way to fix this issue by excluding the PN
> from do_patch dependency:
> diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-common.inc
> b/meta/recipes-devtools/gc
> index e89a7c0..57668f9 100644
> --- a/meta/recipes-d
Hi guys,
I just found that the gcc-runtime-nativesdk has different task signature for
task do_patch, comparing to that of gcc-cross-initial. This would cause a
do_patch failure if we use OEBasicHash as the BB_SIGNATURE_HANDLER. By
comparing their sigdata files, it turns out that the difference
