Re: [OE-core] linux-yocto and gcc 5.x

2015-05-13 Thread akuster808
Robert, this was the error I hit last week. There may be a fix I have not tried. https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/2/18/422 - armin On 05/13/2015 12:39 AM, Robert Yang wrote: I think that I met another problem when MACHINE = qemuarm64 with gcc5: linux-yocto_3.19.bb: /tmp/ccWk2lM2.s: Assembler mess

Re: [OE-core] linux-yocto and gcc 5.x

2015-05-13 Thread Bruce Ashfield
I'll do an explicit round of gcc5 support in master for the kernels we have there in the not to distant future. To throw the switch for gcc5, we'll obviously want all the architectures to build and boot. To keep things practical, I'll start from the -dev kernel, then back to the LTSI kernels we s

Re: [OE-core] linux-yocto and gcc 5.x

2015-05-11 Thread Richard Purdie
On Mon, 2015-05-11 at 09:51 -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote: > On 2015-05-11 09:20 AM, Richard Purdie wrote: > > Hi Bruce, > > > > One of the things we're looking at in 1.9 is gcc 5.x support by default. > > One of the areas this has significant impact is on the kernels, > > linux-yocto in particular.

Re: [OE-core] linux-yocto and gcc 5.x

2015-05-11 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 2015-05-11 09:20 AM, Richard Purdie wrote: Hi Bruce, One of the things we're looking at in 1.9 is gcc 5.x support by default. One of the areas this has significant impact is on the kernels, linux-yocto in particular. I'm starting to see a potential problem here since the kernels don't appear