Re: [OE-core] noticeably longer build (link?) times with binutils 2.26

On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 12:25:12PM -0500, Trevor Woerner wrote: > On 02/09/16 23:37, Khem Raj wrote: > > IIRC gold has its own notions to enable gold > > so you need to enable that > > > >> On Feb 9, 2016, at 8:18 PM, Trevor Woerner wrote: > >> > >> I've tried every

Re: [OE-core] noticeably longer build (link?) times with binutils 2.26

On 02/11/16 14:20, Martin Jansa wrote: Did you add ld-is-gold to DISTRO_FEATURES? Yes, it's the only way I know of to build an image with gold instead of bfd. And no other thing that gets built has any problems finding and running the linker. I'll post my chromium recipe shortly, although

Re: [OE-core] noticeably longer build (link?) times with binutils 2.26

On 02/09/16 23:37, Khem Raj wrote: IIRC gold has its own notions to enable gold so you need to enable that On Feb 9, 2016, at 8:18 PM, Trevor Woerner wrote: I've tried every combination I can think of and no matter what I try, if gold is the linker the chromium build

Re: [OE-core] noticeably longer build (link?) times with binutils 2.26

> On Feb 11, 2016, at 9:25 AM, Trevor Woerner wrote: > > On 02/09/16 23:37, Khem Raj wrote: >> IIRC gold has its own notions to enable gold >> so you need to enable that >> >>> On Feb 9, 2016, at 8:18 PM, Trevor Woerner wrote: >>> >>> I've tried every

Re: [OE-core] noticeably longer build (link?) times with binutils 2.26

On 9 February 2016 at 02:56, Trevor Woerner wrote: > MACHINE = "qemux86-64" > > Essentially: minnowboard max (turbot, specifically) > As an aside, if you're actually building for the MinnowMax then the meta-intel BSP will be a lot better. Ross --

Re: [OE-core] noticeably longer build (link?) times with binutils 2.26

On 02/09/16 05:00, Burton, Ross wrote: On 9 February 2016 at 02:56, Trevor Woerner > wrote: MACHINE = "qemux86-64" Essentially: minnowboard max (turbot, specifically) As an aside, if you're actually building for the MinnowMax

Re: [OE-core] noticeably longer build (link?) times with binutils 2.26

I've tried every combination I can think of and no matter what I try, if gold is the linker the chromium build always errors out with: collect2: fatal error: cannot find 'ld' -- ___ Openembedded-core mailing list

Re: [OE-core] noticeably longer build (link?) times with binutils 2.26

IIRC gold has its own notions to enable gold so you need to enable that > On Feb 9, 2016, at 8:18 PM, Trevor Woerner wrote: > > I've tried every combination I can think of and no matter what I try, if gold > is the linker the chromium build always errors out with: > >

Re: [OE-core] noticeably longer build (link?) times with binutils 2.26

On 02/08/16 19:25, Mark Hatle wrote: Which arch/tune are you targeting? Build Configuration: BB_VERSION= "1.28.0" BUILD_SYS = "x86_64-linux" NATIVELSBSTRING = "openSUSE-project-13.2" TARGET_SYS= "x86_64-poky-linux" MACHINE = "qemux86-64" DISTRO=

Re: [OE-core] noticeably longer build (link?) times with binutils 2.26

> On Feb 8, 2016, at 7:03 PM, Trevor Woerner wrote: > > On 02/08/16 21:25, Khem Raj wrote: >> On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 3:20 PM, Trevor Woerner wrote: >>> This is more of a "FYI", but I've noticed that the build time of my chromium >>> recipe has gone from

Re: [OE-core] noticeably longer build (link?) times with binutils 2.26

On 02/08/16 21:25, Khem Raj wrote: On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 3:20 PM, Trevor Woerner wrote: This is more of a "FYI", but I've noticed that the build time of my chromium recipe has gone from ~45 minutes to ~2h15m when the only thing that changes is to move openembedded-core

Re: [OE-core] noticeably longer build (link?) times with binutils 2.26

On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 3:20 PM, Trevor Woerner wrote: > This is more of a "FYI", but I've noticed that the build time of my chromium > recipe has gone from ~45 minutes to ~2h15m when the only thing that changes > is to move openembedded-core from the commit just before

Re: [OE-core] noticeably longer build (link?) times with binutils 2.26

Which arch/tune are you targeting? I know that on a few processors 2.26 has added "link time optimization" (i.e. our processor is broken and we're working around problems in the linker.) It's possible you hit one of those cases, or it may simply be that much slower for some reason. But worse

[OE-core] noticeably longer build (link?) times with binutils 2.26

This is more of a "FYI", but I've noticed that the build time of my chromium recipe has gone from ~45 minutes to ~2h15m when the only thing that changes is to move openembedded-core from the commit just before upgrading binutils to version 2.26 ([fd75637] native.bbclass: Set CXXFLAGS from