Re: [OE-core] pam related dependency processing bug?

2015-03-25 Thread Martin Jansa
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 01:31:31PM -0700, Janne Karhunen wrote: > Hi, > > Thanks, inherited that file and missed that - and my RPM legacy was > thinking that's about right. > > How do you guys test people don't leak dependencies with global > DEPENDS? Even this must have been passing by accident

Re: [OE-core] pam related dependency processing bug?

2015-03-25 Thread Janne Karhunen
Hi, Thanks, inherited that file and missed that - and my RPM legacy was thinking that's about right. How do you guys test people don't leak dependencies with global DEPENDS? Even this must have been passing by accident quite a while :) -- Janne On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 11:30 AM, Martin Jansa w

Re: [OE-core] pam related dependency processing bug?

2015-03-25 Thread Martin Jansa
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 10:39:34AM -0700, Janne Karhunen wrote: > Hi, > > Wonder if you guys can share some insights on how to debug this case. > I have a legacy PAM module recipe that says: > > DEPENDS_${PN} = "libpam" > > 'pam' is listed in DISTRO_FEATURES and is working fine. However, for > t

[OE-core] pam related dependency processing bug?

2015-03-25 Thread Janne Karhunen
Hi, Wonder if you guys can share some insights on how to debug this case. I have a legacy PAM module recipe that says: DEPENDS_${PN} = "libpam" 'pam' is listed in DISTRO_FEATURES and is working fine. However, for that pam module libpam dependency is silently dropped during the build. If PAM happ