Re: [OE-core] relocate_sdk.py: Possible bug, /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 not relocated

2014-04-03 Thread Stefan Agner
Hi Laurentiu, Am 2014-03-03 09:38, schrieb Laurentiu Palcu: This is the correct behavior. We shouldn't relocate binaries that use host's dynamic loader. When I install the SDK with -S (copy the relocate scripts), and remove the condition around line 95, the binaries work as expected. Can

Re: [OE-core] relocate_sdk.py: Possible bug, /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 not relocated

2014-04-03 Thread Laurentiu Palcu
Hi Stefan, Can you please have a look at the binaries before relocation? Just to make sure... So, for that, run the installer with -R option: ./your_toolchain_installer.sh -R Here, I'm interested which is the default suggested path (see below): Enter target directory for SDK (default:

Re: [OE-core] relocate_sdk.py: Possible bug, /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 not relocated

2014-03-04 Thread Jason Wessel
On 03/01/2014 08:26 AM, Stefan Agner wrote: Hi, Using top of dylan branch, I generated a SDK using bitbake meta-toolchain. I'm running Arch Linux, but I also see similar issues on Ubuntu 12.04.4 LTS: Some binaries segfault when running them. I discovered, that the dynamic linker of the

Re: [OE-core] relocate_sdk.py: Possible bug, /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 not relocated

2014-03-03 Thread Laurentiu Palcu
Hi Stefan, On Sat, Mar 01, 2014 at 03:28:09PM +0100, Stefan Agner wrote: Hi, Using top of dylan branch, I generated a SDK using bitbake meta-toolchain. I'm running Arch Linux, but I also see similar issues on Ubuntu 12.04.4 LTS: Some binaries segfault when running them. I discovered,

[OE-core] relocate_sdk.py: Possible bug, /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 not relocated

2014-03-01 Thread Stefan Agner
Hi, Using top of dylan branch, I generated a SDK using bitbake meta-toolchain. I'm running Arch Linux, but I also see similar issues on Ubuntu 12.04.4 LTS: Some binaries segfault when running them. I discovered, that the dynamic linker of the host is used: $ ldd