Re: [OE-core] rm_work + pybootchart enhancements

On Wed, 2016-09-21 at 17:39 +0200, Patrick Ohly wrote: > new-rmwork-new-scheduler > elapsed: 42:58.54 > final disk usage: 12873MiB > max disk usage: 14230MiB > > A bit better in terms of max disk usage than with the completion > scheduler, but not by much. My observation is that in practice there

Re: [OE-core] rm_work + pybootchart enhancements

On Thu, 2016-09-22 at 10:37 -0700, Christopher Larson wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 5:52 AM, Patrick Ohly > wrote: > That's bitbake specific. What I was remembering is something > generic > that works for anything that prints test results on

Re: [OE-core] rm_work + pybootchart enhancements

On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 5:52 AM, Patrick Ohly wrote: > On Wed, 2016-09-21 at 18:08 +0200, Martin Jansa wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 05:39:02PM +0200, Patrick Ohly wrote: > > > Test script attached. I only ran this once, so I can't vouch that the > > > numbers are

Re: [OE-core] rm_work + pybootchart enhancements

On Wed, 2016-09-21 at 18:08 +0200, Martin Jansa wrote: > On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 05:39:02PM +0200, Patrick Ohly wrote: > > Test script attached. I only ran this once, so I can't vouch that the > > numbers are stable. I remember reading about a benchmark wrapper which > > can run such a test script

Re: [OE-core] rm_work + pybootchart enhancements

On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 05:39:02PM +0200, Patrick Ohly wrote: > Hello! > > rm_work.bbclass currently isn't good enough for use in really tightly > constrained environments. For example, building core-image-sato with > 20GB of free disk space should work (final disk usage with rm_work > active: