On Fri, 3 Feb 2017, Richard Purdie wrote:
> On Fri, 2017-02-03 at 06:45 -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > for purposes of teaching, i wanted to check into the feasibility of
> > having students take advantage of a single shared state cache, but
> > still have the option of building whatever
On Fri, 3 Feb 2017, Richard Purdie wrote:
> On Fri, 2017-02-03 at 06:45 -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > for purposes of teaching, i wanted to check into the feasibility of
> > having students take advantage of a single shared state cache, but
> > still have the option of building whatever
On Fri, 2017-02-03 at 16:24 -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> On Fri, 3 Feb 2017, Patrick Ohly wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 2017-02-03 at 14:14 -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > > is there a command that will tell you how much shared state info a
> > > given build would be able to take advantage of?
>
On Fri, 3 Feb 2017, Patrick Ohly wrote:
> On Fri, 2017-02-03 at 14:14 -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > is there a command that will tell you how much shared state info a
> > given build would be able to take advantage of?
>
> INHERIT += "buildstats-summary" in local.conf will print that
>
On Fri, 2017-02-03 at 14:14 -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> is there a command that will tell you how much shared state info a
> given build would be able to take advantage of?
INHERIT += "buildstats-summary" in local.conf will print that
information after a build is done.
--
Best Regards,
On Fri, 3 Feb 2017, Richard Purdie wrote:
> On Fri, 2017-02-03 at 06:45 -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > for purposes of teaching, i wanted to check into the feasibility of
> > having students take advantage of a single shared state cache, but
> > still have the option of building whatever
On Fri, 3 Feb 2017, Richard Purdie wrote:
> On Fri, 2017-02-03 at 06:45 -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > for purposes of teaching, i wanted to check into the feasibility of
> > having students take advantage of a single shared state cache, but
> > still have the option of building whatever
On Fri, 2017-02-03 at 06:45 -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> for purposes of teaching, i wanted to check into the feasibility of
> having students take advantage of a single shared state cache, but
> still have the option of building whatever source they needed in
> their
> own *personal* sstate
for purposes of teaching, i wanted to check into the feasibility of
having students take advantage of a single shared state cache, but
still have the option of building whatever source they needed in their
own *personal* sstate cache.
i found this reference from 2014:
