Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] gtk+3: don't split immodules if we have none

2013-08-29 Thread Chris Larson
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 10:36 PM, Martin Jansa wrote: > On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 05:05:38PM -0700, Chris Larson wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 4:13 PM, Saul Wold wrote: > > > > > On 08/28/2013 09:12 AM, Christopher Larson wrote: > > > > > >> From: Christopher Larson > > >> > > >> Currently we

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] gtk+3: don't split immodules if we have none

2013-08-28 Thread Martin Jansa
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 05:05:38PM -0700, Chris Larson wrote: > On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 4:13 PM, Saul Wold wrote: > > > On 08/28/2013 09:12 AM, Christopher Larson wrote: > > > >> From: Christopher Larson > >> > >> Currently we don't enable any immodules for gtk+3, yet we unconditionally > >> cal

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] gtk+3: don't split immodules if we have none

2013-08-28 Thread Chris Larson
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 4:13 PM, Saul Wold wrote: > On 08/28/2013 09:12 AM, Christopher Larson wrote: > >> From: Christopher Larson >> >> Currently we don't enable any immodules for gtk+3, yet we unconditionally >> call >> do_split_packages on a nonexistent path. This results in a return value o

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] gtk+3: don't split immodules if we have none

2013-08-28 Thread Saul Wold
On 08/28/2013 09:12 AM, Christopher Larson wrote: From: Christopher Larson Currently we don't enable any immodules for gtk+3, yet we unconditionally call do_split_packages on a nonexistent path. This results in a return value of None, which it then tries to join, resulting in a TypeError. Only