On 10.04.2012 19:53, Mark Hatle wrote:
> We still do not have a clean answer for how to resolve the concerns in
> the recent thread "conf/machine/include: Cleanup MIPS tunings to match
> README". The following is in response to a request I received to
> summarize the discussion so far, and include
On 10.04.2012 21:28, Andreas Oberritter wrote:
> On 10.04.2012 19:53, Mark Hatle wrote:
>> We still do not have a clean answer for how to resolve the concerns in
>> the recent thread "conf/machine/include: Cleanup MIPS tunings to match
>> README". The following is in response to a request I receiv
On 04/16/2012 09:55 PM, Andreas Oberritter wrote:
On 10.04.2012 21:28, Andreas Oberritter wrote:
On 10.04.2012 19:53, Mark Hatle wrote:
We still do not have a clean answer for how to resolve the concerns in
the recent thread "conf/machine/include: Cleanup MIPS tunings to match
README". The f
On Mon, 2012-04-16 at 15:55 +0200, Andreas Oberritter wrote:
> On 10.04.2012 21:28, Andreas Oberritter wrote:
> > On 10.04.2012 19:53, Mark Hatle wrote:
> >> We still do not have a clean answer for how to resolve the concerns in
> >> the recent thread "conf/machine/include: Cleanup MIPS tunings to
On 16.04.2012 16:42, Richard Purdie wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-04-16 at 15:55 +0200, Andreas Oberritter wrote:
>> On 10.04.2012 21:28, Andreas Oberritter wrote:
>>> On 10.04.2012 19:53, Mark Hatle wrote:
We still do not have a clean answer for how to resolve the concerns in
the recent thread "
On 16.04.2012 16:37, Robert Yang wrote:
>
>
> On 04/16/2012 09:55 PM, Andreas Oberritter wrote:
>> On 10.04.2012 21:28, Andreas Oberritter wrote:
>>> On 10.04.2012 19:53, Mark Hatle wrote:
We still do not have a clean answer for how to resolve the concerns in
the recent thread "conf/mac
On 4/16/12 10:15 AM, Andreas Oberritter wrote:
On 16.04.2012 16:42, Richard Purdie wrote:
On Mon, 2012-04-16 at 15:55 +0200, Andreas Oberritter wrote:
On 10.04.2012 21:28, Andreas Oberritter wrote:
On 10.04.2012 19:53, Mark Hatle wrote:
We still do not have a clean answer for how to resolve t
On Mon, 2012-04-16 at 22:37 +0800, Robert Yang wrote:
>
> On 04/16/2012 09:55 PM, Andreas Oberritter wrote:
> > On 10.04.2012 21:28, Andreas Oberritter wrote:
> >> I'm fine with either way that restores mips/mipsel for mips32 targets
> >> *before the release*, because the online update feeds broke
On 16.04.2012 17:30, Mark Hatle wrote:
> On 4/16/12 10:15 AM, Andreas Oberritter wrote:
>> On 16.04.2012 16:42, Richard Purdie wrote:
>>> On Mon, 2012-04-16 at 15:55 +0200, Andreas Oberritter wrote:
On 10.04.2012 21:28, Andreas Oberritter wrote:
> On 10.04.2012 19:53, Mark Hatle wrote:
>>>
On Wed, 2012-04-18 at 13:30 +0200, Andreas Oberritter wrote:
> now, after having repacked all binary tarballs that had mipsel or
> mipsel-nf in their name and contents, and after having changed all
> occurrences of mipsel and mipsel-nf in my local recipes (where
> appropriate), and after having reb
On 18.04.2012 13:40, Richard Purdie wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-04-18 at 13:30 +0200, Andreas Oberritter wrote:
>> now, after having repacked all binary tarballs that had mipsel or
>> mipsel-nf in their name and contents, and after having changed all
>> occurrences of mipsel and mipsel-nf in my local rec
On 18.04.2012 13:45, Andreas Oberritter wrote:
> On 18.04.2012 13:40, Richard Purdie wrote:
>> On Wed, 2012-04-18 at 13:30 +0200, Andreas Oberritter wrote:
>>> now, after having repacked all binary tarballs that had mipsel or
>>> mipsel-nf in their name and contents, and after having changed all
>>
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 01:45:54PM +0200, Andreas Oberritter wrote:
> On 18.04.2012 13:40, Richard Purdie wrote:
> > On Wed, 2012-04-18 at 13:30 +0200, Andreas Oberritter wrote:
> >> now, after having repacked all binary tarballs that had mipsel or
> >> mipsel-nf in their name and contents, and aft
On Wed, 2012-04-18 at 13:54 +0200, Martin Jansa wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 01:45:54PM +0200, Andreas Oberritter wrote:
> > On 18.04.2012 13:40, Richard Purdie wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2012-04-18 at 13:30 +0200, Andreas Oberritter wrote:
> > >> now, after having repacked all binary tarballs that h
On 18.04.2012 14:00, Richard Purdie wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-04-18 at 13:54 +0200, Martin Jansa wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 01:45:54PM +0200, Andreas Oberritter wrote:
>>> On 18.04.2012 13:40, Richard Purdie wrote:
On Wed, 2012-04-18 at 13:30 +0200, Andreas Oberritter wrote:
> now, afte
Op 18 apr. 2012, om 14:00 heeft Richard Purdie het volgende geschreven:
> On Wed, 2012-04-18 at 13:54 +0200, Martin Jansa wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 01:45:54PM +0200, Andreas Oberritter wrote:
>>> On 18.04.2012 13:40, Richard Purdie wrote:
On Wed, 2012-04-18 at 13:30 +0200, Andreas Ob
On Wed, 2012-04-18 at 14:08 +0200, Andreas Oberritter wrote:
> On 18.04.2012 14:00, Richard Purdie wrote:
> > On Wed, 2012-04-18 at 13:54 +0200, Martin Jansa wrote:
> >> I had a lot of those (e.g. because armv7a-vfp-neon was including 20
> >> arm*feed.conf variants in /etc/opkg most of them empty -
On 18.04.2012 14:45, Richard Purdie wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-04-18 at 14:08 +0200, Andreas Oberritter wrote:
>> On 18.04.2012 14:00, Richard Purdie wrote:
>>> On Wed, 2012-04-18 at 13:54 +0200, Martin Jansa wrote:
I had a lot of those (e.g. because armv7a-vfp-neon was including 20
arm*feed.c
On 4/18/12 9:37 AM, Andreas Oberritter wrote:
On 18.04.2012 14:45, Richard Purdie wrote:
On Wed, 2012-04-18 at 14:08 +0200, Andreas Oberritter wrote:
On 18.04.2012 14:00, Richard Purdie wrote:
On Wed, 2012-04-18 at 13:54 +0200, Martin Jansa wrote:
I had a lot of those (e.g. because armv7a-vfp
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 10:21:38AM -0500, Mark Hatle wrote:
> On 4/18/12 9:37 AM, Andreas Oberritter wrote:
> > On 18.04.2012 14:45, Richard Purdie wrote:
> >> On Wed, 2012-04-18 at 14:08 +0200, Andreas Oberritter wrote:
> >>> On 18.04.2012 14:00, Richard Purdie wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-04-18 at
Op 18 apr. 2012, om 17:46 heeft Martin Jansa het volgende geschreven:
> On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 10:21:38AM -0500, Mark Hatle wrote:
>> On 4/18/12 9:37 AM, Andreas Oberritter wrote:
>>> On 18.04.2012 14:45, Richard Purdie wrote:
On Wed, 2012-04-18 at 14:08 +0200, Andreas Oberritter wrote:
>>>
On 18.04.2012 19:01, Koen Kooi wrote:
>
> Op 18 apr. 2012, om 17:46 heeft Martin Jansa het volgende geschreven:
>
>> On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 10:21:38AM -0500, Mark Hatle wrote:
>>> On 4/18/12 9:37 AM, Andreas Oberritter wrote:
On 18.04.2012 14:45, Richard Purdie wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-04-
Op 18 apr. 2012, om 20:10 heeft Andreas Oberritter het volgende geschreven:
> On 18.04.2012 19:01, Koen Kooi wrote:
>>
>> Op 18 apr. 2012, om 17:46 heeft Martin Jansa het volgende geschreven:
>>
>>> On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 10:21:38AM -0500, Mark Hatle wrote:
On 4/18/12 9:37 AM, Andreas Obe
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 07:01:12PM +0200, Koen Kooi wrote:
>
> Op 18 apr. 2012, om 17:46 heeft Martin Jansa het volgende geschreven:
>
> > On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 10:21:38AM -0500, Mark Hatle wrote:
> >> On 4/18/12 9:37 AM, Andreas Oberritter wrote:
> >>> On 18.04.2012 14:45, Richard Purdie wrote
24 matches
Mail list logo