Re: [oe] Patches and commitment

2009-10-08 Thread Marcin Juszkiewicz
Dnia czwartek, 8 października 2009 o 01:53:12 David Lanzendörfer napisał(a): > I started the project OpenMoko4HTC-Dream[1] and I'd like to have access to > push and commit, because I'm developing on a new image for OpenMoko, called > fso-hildon-image. > Until I get access, it would be nice, if som

Re: [oe] lighttpd 1.4.18 runtime issue

2009-10-08 Thread Michael Lippautz
2009/10/8 Otavio Salvador : > In meanwhile it looks to have been fixed in current master; would be > nice if you could test it and provide a updated patch if still needed. I actually tested the build today. Unfortunatelly there is still an issue remaining. The patch fixed the automatically loaded

[oe] Revert Request for linux -> linux-gnu changes

2009-10-08 Thread Graeme Gregory
Hi, I cannot actually carry out this request as I will be without net access for the eV meeting. But it is becoming clear that the linux -> linux-gnu change is throwing up many issues for arches != linux-gnueabi. Partial fixes have been implemented but for every fix another issue seems to pop up.

Re: [oe] Revert Request for linux -> linux-gnu changes

2009-10-08 Thread Holger Hans Peter Freyther
On Thursday 08 October 2009 14:53:02 Graeme Gregory wrote: > Hi, I cannot actually carry out this request as I will be without net > access for the eV meeting. > > But it is becoming clear that the linux -> linux-gnu change is throwing > up many issues for arches != linux-gnueabi. Partial fixes ha

Re: [oe] Revert Request for linux -> linux-gnu changes

2009-10-08 Thread Steffen Sledz
Graeme Gregory wrote: > But it is becoming clear that the linux -> linux-gnu change is throwing > up many issues for arches != linux-gnueabi. Partial fixes have been > implemented but for every fix another issue seems to pop up. > > I suggest these changes should be reverted, placed in a branch an

Re: [oe] Revert Request for linux -> linux-gnu changes

2009-10-08 Thread Marcin Juszkiewicz
Dnia czwartek, 8 października 2009 o 14:53:02 Graeme Gregory napisał(a): > Hi, I cannot actually carry out this request as I will be without net > access for the eV meeting. > > But it is becoming clear that the linux -> linux-gnu change is throwing > up many issues for arches != linux-gnueabi. Pa

Re: [oe] Patches and commitment

2009-10-08 Thread Michael 'Mickey' Lauer
+1 for David's commit access. :M: ___ Openembedded-devel mailing list Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel

Re: [oe] Revert Request for linux -> linux-gnu changes

2009-10-08 Thread Phil Blundell
On Thu, 2009-10-08 at 15:23 +0200, Holger Hans Peter Freyther wrote: > As hard as it is. I agree that it should be backed out and put in a branch > and > tested on non EABI systems. We find new regressions every day. Yes, I agree. It isn't even completely obvious to me that this change has a gr

[oe] Request for collie

2009-10-08 Thread Yuri Bushmelev
Hello! I'm developing kexecboot and testing images on Zauruses (tosa and akita). I would like to take one collie (SL-5500) for adopting kexecboot's interface and bringing x11-image to usable state on collie too. So if you have any unused collie let me know please :) -- Yuri Bushmelev aka Jay7

Re: [oe] Request for collie

2009-10-08 Thread Graeme Gregory
On Thu, Oct 08, 2009 at 07:25:53PM +0400, Yuri Bushmelev wrote: > Hello! > > I'm developing kexecboot and testing images on Zauruses (tosa and akita). > I would like to take one collie (SL-5500) for adopting kexecboot's interface > and bringing x11-image to usable state on collie too. > > So if

Re: [oe] lighttpd 1.4.18 runtime issue

2009-10-08 Thread Henning Heinold
On Thu, Oct 08, 2009 at 02:17:25PM +0200, Michael Lippautz wrote: > 2009/10/8 Otavio Salvador : > > In meanwhile it looks to have been fixed in current master; would be > > nice if you could test it and provide a updated patch if still needed. > > I actually tested the build today. Unfortunatelly

Re: [oe] Revert Request for linux -> linux-gnu changes

2009-10-08 Thread Khem Raj
On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 6:42 AM, Phil Blundell wrote: > On Thu, 2009-10-08 at 15:23 +0200, Holger Hans Peter Freyther wrote: >> As hard as it is. I agree that it should be backed out and put in a branch >> and >> tested on non EABI systems. We find new regressions every day. > > Yes, I agree.  It

Re: [oe] build of libxrender failed

2009-10-08 Thread David Lanzendörfer
Which distro you have configured in your local.conf? With the wrong (eg. old openmoko or fso) it doesnt work very good eventually. The have different prefered versions. Please give me more informations over your build/conf/local.conf then I can help you. greatings leviathan signature.as

[oe] [PATCH] matchbox-panel-0.9.3: fix uninitialised variable causing SIGBUS

2009-10-08 Thread Graham Gower
As reported here: http://lists.o-hand.com/matchbox/0289.html I've not experienced the bug for over a month since applying this change. Signed-off-by: Graham Gower --- .../matchbox-panel-uninitialised-crash.patch | 10 ++ recipes/matchbox-panel/matchbox-panel_0.9.3.bb |5

Re: [oe] [PATCH] matchbox-panel-0.9.3: fix uninitialised variable causing SIGBUS

2009-10-08 Thread Holger Hans Peter Freyther
On Friday 09 October 2009 05:16:41 Graham Gower wrote: > As reported here: > http://lists.o-hand.com/matchbox/0289.html > > I've not experienced the bug for over a month since applying this change. > > > Signed-off-by: Graham Gower Signed-off-by: Holger Hans Peter Freyther > --- > .../matc