Hi Andrea,
We are waiting if our patches for the IGEP v2 board are published on
the development branch of Open Embedded to be able better support.
Meanwhile, please ask your questions to
http://www.myigep.com/forum
Actually, we are working with DSP TI codecs without problems but not
using Open
From: Marcin Juszkiewicz
Signed-off-by: Marcin Juszkiewicz
---
recipes/linux/linux-bug_2.6.27.2.bb | 13 ++---
1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/recipes/linux/linux-bug_2.6.27.2.bb
b/recipes/linux/linux-bug_2.6.27.2.bb
index b5899a7..8c83f9a 100644
---
Signed-off-by: Marcin Juszkiewicz
---
recipes/linux/linux-2.6.23/time.h.patch | 25 +
recipes/linux/linux_2.6.23.bb |2 ++
2 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 recipes/linux/linux-2.6.23/time.h.patch
diff --git a/recipes/l
Signed-off-by: Marcin Juszkiewicz
---
recipes/linux/linux-2.6.24/time.h.patch | 25 -
recipes/linux/linux_2.6.24.bb |1 -
2 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
delete mode 100644 recipes/linux/linux-2.6.24/time.h.patch
diff --git a/recipes/li
On 21-10-09 10:14, Enric Balletbò i Serra wrote:
Hi Andrea,
We are waiting if our patches for the IGEP v2 board are published on
the development branch of Open Embedded to be able better support.
I have them queued on a local branch together with some fixed I need to
test before pushing them
Hi,
Lately some people have started adding recipes that fetch from an SCM
without adding a srcrev either to the recipe or to sane-srcrevs.inc.
That is bad. Unacceptable even.
e.g.
http://dominion.thruhere.net/git/cgit.cgi/openembedded/commit/?id=cd473395ebf9adbf04ff4235878615cfa25daaf7
Pre
On Wednesday 21 October 2009 12:47:41 Koen Kooi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Lately some people have started adding recipes that fetch from an SCM
> without adding a srcrev either to the recipe or to sane-srcrevs.inc.
> That is bad. Unacceptable even.
I agree, It must be possible to do
1.) bitbake -cfetchal
> 1.) bitbake -cfetchall task
>
> then remove network and
>
> 2.) bitbake task...
>
> if that is not the case we suck.
Agreed. Perhaps it's really time to add some git commit checks as things
like the presence of a SRCREV_pn entry in sane-srcrev.inc can easily be
checked.
:M:
__
Signed-off-by: Marcin Juszkiewicz
---
...ude-limits.h-in-sumversion.c-for-PATH_MAX.patch | 29
recipes/linux/linux_2.6.20.bb |1 +
2 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
create mode 100644
recipes/linux/linux-2.6.20/0001-kbuild-include
On Wed, 21 Oct 2009, Holger Hans Peter Freyther wrote:
> On Wednesday 21 October 2009 12:47:41 Koen Kooi wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Lately some people have started adding recipes that fetch from an SCM
> > without adding a srcrev either to the recipe or to sane-srcrevs.inc.
> > That is bad. Unacceptab
On 21-10-09 13:10, Michael 'Mickey' Lauer wrote:
1.) bitbake -cfetchall task
then remove network and
2.) bitbake task...
if that is not the case we suck.
Agreed. Perhaps it's really time to add some git commit checks as things
like the presence of a SRCREV_pn entry in sane-srcrev.inc can eas
Signed-off-by: Marcin Juszkiewicz
---
.../em-x270/01-prevent_loop_timespec_add_ns.patch | 19 ---
recipes/linux/linux_2.6.23.bb |3 +--
2 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
delete mode 100644
recipes/linux/linux-2.6.23/em-x270/01-prevent
Am Mittwoch, den 21.10.2009, 13:21 +0200 schrieb Koen Kooi:
> On 21-10-09 13:10, Michael 'Mickey' Lauer wrote:
> >> 1.) bitbake -cfetchall task
> >>
> >> then remove network and
> >>
> >> 2.) bitbake task...
> >>
> >> if that is not the case we suck.
> >
> > Agreed. Perhaps it's really time to add
Signed-off-by: Marcin Juszkiewicz
---
recipes/linux/linux_2.6.26.bb |3 +--
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/recipes/linux/linux_2.6.26.bb b/recipes/linux/linux_2.6.26.bb
index e1bb68c..775d2d8 100644
--- a/recipes/linux/linux_2.6.26.bb
+++ b/recipes/linux/linux
Signed-off-by: Marcin Juszkiewicz
---
...mp-fix-for-the-40-relocation-binutils-pro.patch | 49 --
...2-GRO-Disable-GRO-on-legacy-netif_rx-path.patch | 54
recipes/linux/linux_2.6.29.bb |2 -
3 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 105 d
Dnia poniedziałek, 19 października 2009 o 20:18:28 Marcin Juszkiewicz
napisał(a):
> And those reasons are why I did not pushed any of those this time (before I
> updated .30 and .31). Tomorrow will do some build testing.
I did a check for applying all patches for those machines (they alter SRC_U
Acked-by: Philip Balister
On 10/21/2009 04:28 AM, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote:
From: Marcin Juszkiewicz
Signed-off-by: Marcin Juszkiewicz
---
recipes/linux/linux-bug_2.6.27.2.bb | 13 ++---
1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/recipes/linux/linux-bug_2.6.2
Hi Koen,
>
> I have them queued on a local branch together with some fixed I need to test
> before pushing them out.
> You might have noticed the patchwork status of your patches has been updated
> :)
>
Could you add support for IGEPv2 in dmai?
I patched /recipes/ti/ti-dmai/touchbook-support.patc
On 21-10-09 10:28, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote:
From: Marcin Juszkiewicz
Acked-by: Koen Kooi
Signed-off-by: Marcin Juszkiewicz
---
recipes/linux/linux-bug_2.6.27.2.bb | 13 ++---
1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/recipes/linux/linux-bug_2.6.27.2.bb
On 21-10-09 15:53, Andrea wrote:
Hi Koen,
I have them queued on a local branch together with some fixed I need to test
before pushing them out.
You might have noticed the patchwork status of your patches has been updated
:)
Could you add support for IGEPv2 in dmai?
I patched /recipes/ti/ti-
On Wed, 2009-10-21 at 13:42 +0200, Michael 'Mickey' Lauer wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, den 21.10.2009, 13:21 +0200 schrieb Koen Kooi:
> > If we continue down the sane-srcrevs.inc route we should consider moving
> > PV_pn into there as well. Having SRCREV and PN in 2 different places
> > only adds confus
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 5:33 AM, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>
> from the latest git pull, a build that seemed to work fine a couple
> days ago:
>
> ... snip ...
>
> NOTE: Running task 2037 of 3361 (ID: 2919,
> /home/rpjday/oe/openembedded/recipes/gnome/gconf_2.26.2.bb, do_install)
> ERROR: function
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 07:57:40PM +0100, Richard Purdie wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-10-21 at 13:42 +0200, Michael 'Mickey' Lauer wrote:
> > Am Mittwoch, den 21.10.2009, 13:21 +0200 schrieb Koen Kooi:
> > > If we continue down the sane-srcrevs.inc route we should consider moving
> > > PV_pn into there a
* getsize returns an error if the file does not exist
we check first if the file exist and then we check if
it is zero sized. So we can avoid the error when doing
bitbake -c clean -b
Signed-off-by: Khem Raj
---
lib/bb/build.py |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
d
Hi
I have tested a patch which essentially moves gcc 4.4.1 recipes to gcc
4.4.2. There are no changes other than PR
The patch is too big and some lines are larger than 998 chars which
violates the RFC2822 and hence git send-email
will not send it.
There are 25 bug fixes from 4.4.1 to 4.4.2 (per g
From: Petri Lehtinen
Signed-off-by: Petri Lehtinen
---
conf/checksums.ini |4
recipes/clish/{clish_0.7.1.bb => clish_0.7.3.bb} |3 ++-
recipes/clish/files/configure.patch | 19 +++
3 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 1 de
26 matches
Mail list logo
