Re: [oe] OpenEmbedded stand at FOSDEM

2010-01-04 Thread Frans Meulenbroeks
2009/12/27 Robert Schuster : > Hi, > sorry for being late with this. Work and Christmas came into the way. > > Our request for a stand at FOSDEM was successful! However as in the > years before we only get one table (I explicitly asked for a second one > and gave a reason for it but they ignored it

Re: [oe] Qt4 GLES (once again)

2010-01-04 Thread Koen Kooi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 04-01-10 08:40, Holger Hans Peter Freyther wrote: > On Saturday 02 January 2010 09:28:18 Koen Kooi wrote: > >> If that works, I can live with that. > > Hi Koen, > > that is the current patch. It is working for the !GLES case and it would be > gre

Re: [oe] OpenEmbedded stand at FOSDEM

2010-01-04 Thread Alessandro GARDICH
Robert Schuster wrote: Hi, sorry for being late with this. Work and Christmas came into the way. Our request for a stand at FOSDEM was successful! However as in the years before we only get one table (I explicitly asked for a second one and gave a reason for it but they ignored it). Anyway. Who

[oe] Libx11-native dependency loop

2010-01-04 Thread Koen Kooi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, http://cgit.openembedded.org/cgit.cgi/openembedded/commit/?id=f017581d074adb0d88312939dafdb9fa74b0b494 created a dependency loop that crashes the bitbake loop detector, so I can't really debug it. Holger, can you fix or revert? regards, Koen --

Re: [oe] Qt4 GLES (once again)

2010-01-04 Thread Holger Hans Peter Freyther
On Monday 04 January 2010 09:21:52 Koen Kooi wrote: > On 04-01-10 08:40, Holger Hans Peter Freyther wrote: > > On Saturday 02 January 2010 09:28:18 Koen Kooi wrote: > >> If that works, I can live with that. > > > > Hi Koen, > > > > that is the current patch. It is working for the !GLES case and it

Re: [oe] Qt4 GLES (once again)

2010-01-04 Thread Koen Kooi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 04-01-10 11:25, Holger Hans Peter Freyther wrote: > For X11 we already have a PREFERRED_PROVIDER setting in place and don't need > to update. Thats not quite true, only qt4x11 is defined, but we need qt4-x11-free. > --- > conf/compatibility-pro

Re: [oe] [TSC] First Meeting

2010-01-04 Thread Richard Purdie
On Wed, 2009-12-30 at 14:45 +, Graeme Gregory wrote: > > Jabber conference rooms? > > > I can organize one of these on my jabber server I have tested that > functionality with koen before. I'm ok with this, are there any objections? Are we going to give public access to the discussions or po

Re: [oe] [TSC] First Meeting

2010-01-04 Thread Koen Kooi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 04-01-10 11:46, Richard Purdie wrote: > On Wed, 2009-12-30 at 14:45 +, Graeme Gregory wrote: >>> Jabber conference rooms? >>> >> I can organize one of these on my jabber server I have tested that >> functionality with koen before. > > I'm ok wi

Re: [oe] [TSC] First Meeting

2010-01-04 Thread Frans Meulenbroeks
2010/1/4 Richard Purdie : > On Wed, 2009-12-30 at 14:45 +, Graeme Gregory wrote: >> > Jabber conference rooms? >> > >> I can organize one of these on my jabber server I have tested that >> functionality with koen before. > > I'm ok with this, are there any objections? > > Are we going to give p

Re: [oe] [TSC] First Meeting

2010-01-04 Thread Michael 'Mickey' Lauer
Hi folks, I'm fine with jabber. Cheers, :M: ___ Openembedded-devel mailing list Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel

Re: [oe] [TSC] First Meeting

2010-01-04 Thread Graeme Gregory
On Mon, Jan 04, 2010 at 10:46:47AM +, Richard Purdie wrote: > On Wed, 2009-12-30 at 14:45 +, Graeme Gregory wrote: > > > Jabber conference rooms? > > > > > I can organize one of these on my jabber server I have tested that > > functionality with koen before. > > I'm ok with this, are ther

Re: [oe] [TSC] First Meeting

2010-01-04 Thread Richard Purdie
On Mon, 2010-01-04 at 12:24 +0100, Michael 'Mickey' Lauer wrote: > I'm fine with jabber. Ok, when can we setup a regular meeting for? I had proposed 8pm-9pm on Monday 4th (i.e. today) as our first meeting. I have no idea if that will work you/Chris though :/. Cheers, Richard _

Re: [oe] [TSC] First Meeting

2010-01-04 Thread Richard Purdie
On Mon, 2010-01-04 at 11:02 +, Graeme Gregory wrote: > On Mon, Jan 04, 2010 at 10:46:47AM +, Richard Purdie wrote: > > On Wed, 2009-12-30 at 14:45 +, Graeme Gregory wrote: > > > > Jabber conference rooms? > > > > > > > I can organize one of these on my jabber server I have tested that

Re: [oe] Qt4 GLES (once again)

2010-01-04 Thread Holger Hans Peter Freyther
On Monday 04 January 2010 11:35:43 Koen Kooi wrote: > On 04-01-10 11:25, Holger Hans Peter Freyther wrote: > > For X11 we already have a PREFERRED_PROVIDER setting in place and don't > > need to update. > > Thats not quite true, only qt4x11 is defined, but we need qt4-x11-free. Good point. Should

Re: [oe] why we don't setup a buildbot for openembedded QA?

2010-01-04 Thread Rolf Leggewie
Holger Hans Peter Freyther wrote: > The other is the tinderbox setup will soon gain a waterfall view[...] I thought I updated the necessary code about a month ago, no? I'm not sure how the feature is supposed to be used, but isn't http://tinderbox.openembedded.net/waterfall/ what you are talking a

Re: [oe] [TSC] First Meeting

2010-01-04 Thread Chris Larson
My schedule is usually fairly open, other than the occasional meeting. Either IRC or Jabber are fine with me, and can do them from either work or home (I doubt I'll get any complaints about doing it on work's time, given we use bitbake in MVL6). Today is mostly meeting free, but I do have some tr

Re: [oe] why we don't setup a buildbot for openembedded QA?

2010-01-04 Thread Holger Hans Peter Freyther
On Monday 04 January 2010 16:07:55 Rolf Leggewie wrote: > Holger Hans Peter Freyther wrote: > > The other is the tinderbox setup will soon gain a waterfall view[...] > > I thought I updated the necessary code about a month ago, no? I'm not > sure how the feature is supposed to be used, but isn't >

Re: [oe] qmake issue

2010-01-04 Thread Richard Purdie
On Mon, 2010-01-04 at 08:31 +0100, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote: > Yeah figured out after a brief discussion on #oe that they probably > didn't need to be staged. > > Actually the recipe does not contain any staging, so this is a side > effect of the new automated staging. > It could well be that othe

Re: [oe] compilation of gcc-cross-intermediate-4.4.2 failed due to lack of fenv.h

2010-01-04 Thread Khem Raj
On (31/12/09 16:56), Guo Hongruan wrote: > I am afraid that the failure is not so easy. > > Today, I recompile the following builds: > MACHINE=qemux86 DISTRO=micro-uclibc > MACHINE=qemuarm DISTRO=micro-uclibc > MACHINE=qemumips DISTRO=micro-uclibc > > only qemuarm works. But the problem is that t

Re: [oe] [TSC] First Meeting

2010-01-04 Thread Michael 'Mickey' Lauer
Am Montag, den 04.01.2010, 11:02 + schrieb Graeme Gregory: > If people can tell me there jabber login I can create a TSC private room and > invite > people to it. mic...@totalueberwachung.de Apart from today and Friday, I'm pretty open towards a date. Cheers, :M: ___

Re: [oe] [TSC] First Meeting

2010-01-04 Thread Denys Dmytriyenko
On Mon, Jan 04, 2010 at 11:02:33AM +, Graeme Gregory wrote: > For public meetings I guess just have a public jabber chat. Or... > Yes, but so far 2 out of 5 TSC members are not replying to email. If people > can tell me there jabber login I can create a TSC private room and invite > people to

[oe] xmonobut-0.4.1.tar.gz missing checksum

2010-01-04 Thread Ajit Limaye
Hi: I am building a xii-image, using the following conf file for bitbake: DL_DIR = "${OEBASE}/sources" BBFILES = "${OEBASE}/openembedded/recipes/*/*.bb" MACHINE = "overo" DISTRO = "angstrom-2008.1" BBDEBUG = "yes" DEBUG_BUILD = "1" INHIBIT_PACKAGE_STRIP = "1" BBINCLUDELOGS = "yes" I get the f

Re: [oe] [TSC] First Meeting

2010-01-04 Thread Phil Blundell
On Mon, 2010-01-04 at 14:06 -0500, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: > On Mon, Jan 04, 2010 at 11:02:33AM +, Graeme Gregory wrote: > > For public meetings I guess just have a public jabber chat. > > Or... > > > Yes, but so far 2 out of 5 TSC members are not replying to email. If people > > can tell me

Re: [oe] compiling glibc-2.6.1 failed due to undefined reference to `_begin

2010-01-04 Thread Khem Raj
On (03/01/10 20:14), Guo Hongruan wrote: > Hi guys: >There is a building failure of org.openembedded.dev. I think it > may be a bug of openembedded. Have anyone met the same bug? Or have > some idea about it? I guess you are using latest binutils. There has been changes in ld which surfaced th

Re: [oe] DOLT(doltlibtool)

2010-01-04 Thread Michael Smith
GNUtoo wrote: So far I identified 4 software using dolt: *abiword 2.8.1 *goffice 0.7.4 *xf86-video-intel 2.9.1 *gmime 2.4.10 Also xserver-xorg (patched in c10e9906a2ecea7e9c04bf967a8882d6b4cd1077), cairo (b57a5b04cd35c935bd7ed46ec8db07ec7c0766db), and webkit (c70445331f91cb7f02503e7567927b9b

Re: [oe] xmonobut-0.4.1.tar.gz missing checksum

2010-01-04 Thread Paul Menzel
Dear Ajit, Am Montag, den 04.01.2010, 11:11 -0800 schrieb Ajit Limaye: […] > Any suggestions regarding what I am doing wrong or what else I can try > would be greatly appreciated. you can try out the suggestions documented in the Wiki [1]. Thanks, Paul [1] http://wiki.openembedded.net/in

Re: [oe] DOLT(doltlibtool)

2010-01-04 Thread Chris Larson
On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 12:57 PM, Michael Smith wrote: > GNUtoo wrote: > > So far I identified 4 software using dolt: >> *abiword 2.8.1 >> *goffice 0.7.4 >> *xf86-video-intel 2.9.1 >> *gmime 2.4.10 >> > > Also xserver-xorg (patched in c10e9906a2ecea7e9c04bf967a8882d6b4cd1077), > cairo (b57a5b04cd

[oe] OE weekly changelog 2009-12-28 to 2010-01-04

2010-01-04 Thread Cliff Brake
OE weekly changelog 2009-12-28 to 2010-01-04 Andrea Adami (3): kernel.bbclass: copy gz, lzo, lzma initramfs cpio images. - since 2.6.30 the linux-kexecboot.inc: favour lzma for initramfs.cpio for k. >= 2.6.32 linux-kexecboot.inc: use bb.utils.vercmp_part for version_less_or_equal. Bu Benja

Re: [oe] qmake issue

2010-01-04 Thread Frans Meulenbroeks
2010/1/4 Richard Purdie : > On Mon, 2010-01-04 at 08:31 +0100, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote: >> Yeah figured out after a brief discussion on #oe that they probably >> didn't need to be staged. >> >> Actually the recipe does not contain any staging, so this is a side >> effect of the new automated stagi

Re: [oe] qmake issue

2010-01-04 Thread Koen Kooi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 04-01-10 21:14, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote: > 2010/1/4 Richard Purdie : >> On Mon, 2010-01-04 at 08:31 +0100, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote: >>> Yeah figured out after a brief discussion on #oe that they probably >>> didn't need to be staged. >>> >>> Actua

Re: [oe] qmake issue

2010-01-04 Thread Frans Meulenbroeks
2010/1/4 Koen Kooi : > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 04-01-10 21:14, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote: >> 2010/1/4 Richard Purdie : >>> On Mon, 2010-01-04 at 08:31 +0100, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote: Yeah figured out after a brief discussion on #oe that they probably didn't

[oe] ro/rw boot order

2010-01-04 Thread GNUtoo
hi, I used that combinaison: MACHINE = "eee701" DISTRO = "angstrom-2008.1" eee701 beeing that file: #- #...@type: Machine #...@name: eeepc 701 #...@description: Machine configuration for the eeepc 701 netbook #

Re: [oe] [done] package VDR for OE

2010-01-04 Thread Paul Menzel
Am Sonntag, den 03.01.2010, 15:15 +0100 schrieb Paul Menzel: > Am Montag, den 14.12.2009, 21:28 +0100 schrieb Paul Menzel: > > Am Montag, den 14.12.2009, 21:10 +0100 schrieb Henning Heinold: > > > On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 08:13:32PM +0100, Paul Menzel wrote: > > > > Could someone advise me on how to

Re: [oe] [PATCH] Add --disable-decimal-float option to gcc-cross-intermediate/gcc-cross_4.4.2.bb

2010-01-04 Thread Khem Raj
On (02/01/10 15:33), Guo Hongruan wrote: > 1. Add --disable-decimal-float option to gcc-cross-intermediate_4.4.2.bb when > LIBC == uclibc and TARGET_ARCH == i[3|4|5|6]86, without it, the compilation > will failed due to lack of fenv.h. > --- > recipes/gcc/gcc-cross-intermediate_4.4.2.bb |7 +

Re: [oe] ro/rw boot order

2010-01-04 Thread Denys Dmytriyenko
On Mon, Jan 04, 2010 at 10:25:17PM +0100, GNUtoo wrote: > and menu.lst says root=/dev/hda1 ro > > and in angstrom /etc/rcS.d there is: > S03udev > S10checkroot > > And when booting it freeze unless you change udev/checkroot order or put > rw to the kernel command line. > > I bet that some people

[oe] [bitbake vdr] /arm-angstrom-linux-gnueabi/bin/ld: cannot find -lintl

2010-01-04 Thread Paul Menzel
Dear OpenEmbedded hackers, I tried to build the new VDR recipe [1] with the following command. $ bitbake -c clean vdr $ bitbake vdr But I get the following error. NOTE: Running task 802 of 813 (ID: 8, /oe/openembedded/recipes/vdr/vdr_1.7.10.bb, do_compile) ERRO

Re: [oe] compiling glibc-2.6.1 failed due to undefined reference to `_begin

2010-01-04 Thread Guo Hongruan
Thanks for your information, I will try it on my site. Thanks again. 在 Tue, 05 Jan 2010 03:17:28 +0800,Khem Raj 写道: On (03/01/10 20:14), Guo Hongruan wrote: Hi guys: There is a building failure of org.openembedded.dev. I think it may be a bug of openembedded. Have anyone met the same bug

Re: [oe] [PATCH] Add --disable-decimal-float option to gcc-cross-intermediate/gcc-cross_4.4.2.bb

2010-01-04 Thread Guo Hongruan
在 Tue, 05 Jan 2010 07:14:53 +0800,Khem Raj 写道: On (02/01/10 15:33), Guo Hongruan wrote: 1. Add --disable-decimal-float option to gcc-cross-intermediate_4.4.2.bb when LIBC == uclibc and TARGET_ARCH == i[3|4|5|6]86, without it, the compilation will failed due to lack of fenv.h. --- recipe

Re: [oe] why we don't setup a buildbot for openembedded QA?

2010-01-04 Thread Guo Hongruan
No, I am not talking about tinderbox but buildbot. I want to setup a public buildbot and validate every possible combinations of openembedded. In another words, I want to do some QA jobs of openembedded. Of course, I need help and support from all of you. I want a public server which runs p

[oe] x11-image can't start up

2010-01-04 Thread Dejun.Liu
Hi, I have build angstrom x11-image and test it with Qemu, But Qemu failed to start up. i dig the reason find that system have no more inodes to use. df -i result: --- filesystem inodes usedAvailable use% /dev/root 11040