Re: [oe] what the use of toolchain-extras.tar.gz generated by bitbake meta-toolchain

2010-01-06 Thread Denys Dmytriyenko
On Thu, Jan 07, 2010 at 01:21:42PM +0800, Guo Hongruan wrote: > Hi guys, > Today, I am wondering what the use of toolchain-extra.tar.gz generated by > bitbake meta-toolchain*. When and How the application developers need it? > Is toolcain.tar.gz not enough? >From meta-toolchain.bb, line #69:

[oe] RFC Namespace for GDB python helper scripts

2010-01-06 Thread Holger Hans Peter Freyther
Hi All, since GDB 7.0 it is possible to write some python scripts and hook into core functionality of GDB. To date I'm only aware of scripts in glib to make use of it but I think we will see many more. I think it would be nice if we have a common name for these helper scripts as this will ease

[oe] what the use of toolchain-extras.tar.gz generated by bitbake meta-toolchain

2010-01-06 Thread Guo Hongruan
Hi guys, Today, I am wondering what the use of toolchain-extra.tar.gz generated by bitbake meta-toolchain*. When and How the application developers need it? Is toolcain.tar.gz not enough? Thanks a lot! -- Guo Hongruan, Embedded Linux Consultant Skype: camelguo Twitter: camelguo http://www

Re: [oe] QA Goals for OpenEmbedded

2010-01-06 Thread Holger Hans Peter Freyther
On Wednesday 06 January 2010 23:57:53 Philip Balister wrote: > On 01/06/2010 05:09 PM, Rolf Leggewie wrote: > > Holger Hans Peter Freyther wrote: > >>*) Does bitbake world work? If not it would be cool if someone could > >> take a look? > > > > I was hoping for bitbake world to work as a QA too

Re: [oe] why we don't setup a buildbot for openembedded QA?

2010-01-06 Thread Holger Hans Peter Freyther
On Thursday 07 January 2010 03:02:05 Guo Hongruan wrote: > 在 Wed, 06 Jan 2010 11:59:45 +0800,Holger Hans Peter Freyther > > Yes, I agree with you. It is not worth to make sure every combinations of > GCC, GLIBC and BINUTILS work perfectly. For example, some versions of > binutils is too old to wo

Re: [oe] why we don't setup a buildbot for openembedded QA?

2010-01-06 Thread Guo Hongruan
在 Wed, 06 Jan 2010 11:59:45 +0800,Holger Hans Peter Freyther 写道: On Tuesday 05 January 2010 03:06:47 Guo Hongruan wrote: No, I am not talking about tinderbox but buildbot. I want to setup a public buildbot and validate every possible combinations of openembedded. In another words, I want

[oe] SIGSEGV during python-native build workarounds

2010-01-06 Thread Stanislav Brabec
Hallo. In last few months I encountered crashes during build of python-native with openSUSE 11.2 x86_64 host. Backtrace signalizes that the crash happens while ncurses attempts to parse termcap. I has not been searching for a patch yet, but these workarounds may help to somebody who will encounte

Re: [oe] QA Goals for OpenEmbedded

2010-01-06 Thread Philip Balister
On 01/06/2010 05:09 PM, Rolf Leggewie wrote: Holger Hans Peter Freyther wrote: *) Does bitbake world work? If not it would be cool if someone could take a look? I was hoping for bitbake world to work as a QA tool. But my efforts on the world target didn't really receive

Re: [oe] [PATCH 1/1] Update unavailable whois 4.5.25 to available version 4.7.30.

2010-01-06 Thread Rolf Leggewie
Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: > Can you please elaborate? Packages can always be updated. But given the strong dispreference for removing recipes it will lead to much less problems if OE just hosts the sources itself. Unfetchable upstream sources and updating recipes to the latest versions are fairly

Re: [oe] QA Goals for OpenEmbedded

2010-01-06 Thread Rolf Leggewie
Holger Hans Peter Freyther wrote: > *) Does bitbake world work? If not it would be cool if someone could > take > a look? I was hoping for bitbake world to work as a QA tool. But my efforts on the world target didn't really receive a warm welcome. By now world is so utterly br

Re: [oe] DOLT(doltlibtool)

2010-01-06 Thread Otavio Salvador
Hello Mike, On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 5:57 PM, Michael Smith wrote: > GNUtoo wrote: > >> So far I identified 4 software using dolt: >> *abiword 2.8.1 >> *goffice 0.7.4 >> *xf86-video-intel 2.9.1 >> *gmime 2.4.10 > > Also xserver-xorg (patched in c10e9906a2ecea7e9c04bf967a8882d6b4cd1077), > cairo (b5

Re: [oe] Problem using output of console-image

2010-01-06 Thread Philip Balister
On 01/06/2010 10:25 AM, saleh usman wrote: Hi I've built console-image for omap5912osk machine but I am facing problem in using output.There are four folders named all, armv5te, i686, omap5912osk in /temp/deploy/glibc/ipk.and so many ipk files in these folders. Which files exactly I should use

Re: [oe] QA Goals for OpenEmbedded

2010-01-06 Thread Martin Jansa
On Wed, Jan 06, 2010 at 03:26:41PM +, Richard Purdie wrote: > On Wed, 2010-01-06 at 05:07 +0100, Holger Hans Peter Freyther wrote: > > *) Koen reported that dependency loop reporting is not working anymore.. > > anyone cares to invest thes five minutes to fix that? > > In bitba

Re: [oe] Problem using output of console-image

2010-01-06 Thread Gary Thomas
On 01/06/2010 08:25 AM, saleh usman wrote: Hi I've built console-image for omap5912osk machine but I am facing problem in using output.There are four folders named all, armv5te, i686, omap5912osk in /temp/deploy/glibc/ipk.and so many ipk files in these folders. Which files exactly I should use

[oe] Problem using output of console-image

2010-01-06 Thread saleh usman
Hi I've built console-image for omap5912osk machine but I am facing problem in using output.There are four folders named all, armv5te, i686, omap5912osk in /temp/deploy/glibc/ipk.and so many ipk files in these folders. Which files exactly I should use to run the output on my target platform and

Re: [oe] QA Goals for OpenEmbedded

2010-01-06 Thread Richard Purdie
On Wed, 2010-01-06 at 05:07 +0100, Holger Hans Peter Freyther wrote: > *) Koen reported that dependency loop reporting is not working anymore.. > anyone cares to invest thes five minutes to fix that? In bitbake? > *) Sometimes we have pretty embarassing issues like some im

[oe] bitbake image building problem; possible bug in bitbake; also some openembedded image.bbclass suggestions

2010-01-06 Thread Frans Meulenbroeks
I'm mailing this to both the bitbake and oe dev lists. The problem might be bitbake related, but I can't explain it without openembedded. Also there are some openembedded improvement suggestions too. BTW please be gentle with me wrt the python part as I am really a python n00b. And notice that I am

Re: [oe] Error building gcc-cross

2010-01-06 Thread martin mangard
> gcc 3.4 will not build libstdc++.so.5. You have to use gcc 3.3 > try to build one of those. They may be rusted over a long time. > You can also take a prebuild ipk > I tried to build other versions but they also failed with the error: "./read-rtl.c:653: error: lvalue required as increment operan

Re: [oe] Qt4 GLES (once again)

2010-01-06 Thread Holger Hans Peter Freyther
On Monday 04 January 2010 11:35:43 Koen Kooi wrote: > On 04-01-10 11:25, Holger Hans Peter Freyther wrote: > > For X11 we already have a PREFERRED_PROVIDER setting in place and don't > > need to update. > > Thats not quite true, only qt4x11 is defined, but we need qt4-x11-free. What about these t

Re: [oe] QA Goals for OpenEmbedded

2010-01-06 Thread Koen Kooi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 06-01-10 05:07, Holger Hans Peter Freyther wrote: > > *) Sometimes we have pretty embarassing issues like some images > switching > from mdev back to udev and we don't notice for months(!!!) > It would totally rock i