Re: [oe] TSC Meeting 7/1/2010

2010-01-14 Thread Frans Meulenbroeks
2010/1/15 Denys Dmytriyenko : > On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 10:02:57AM +0100, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote: >> I suggest to review the rules;. E.g. this one: >> # This should all be on one line and you should leave an empty line >> before any detailed commit information. >> Nice, but if you use git commit

Re: [oe] Adding a new Machine question

2010-01-14 Thread Khem Raj
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 1:05 PM, Perepelica Alexander wrote: > After some conf changes I get unknown device sda - but I look at kernel > config seems all is ok try one of /dev/hda or dev/sda1 or /dev/hda1 > > * Khem Raj [Thu, 14 Jan 2010 12:25:41 -0800]: >> >> On (14/01/10 09:45), Martyn Welch

Re: [oe] illume-image

2010-01-14 Thread Khem Raj
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 2:17 PM, GNUtoo wrote: > hi, > every time I build the illume image I've the following failures: > > > First failure: > -- > The first failure is about libefso and its deps,it has missing includes > and so it fails,long time ago I tried to fix it but at a point I

Re: [oe] [PATCH] Support building all project in one directory

2010-01-14 Thread Marcin Juszkiewicz
Dnia piątek, 15 stycznia 2010 o 02:35:13 Guo Hongruan napisał(a): > 在 Fri, 15 Jan 2010 03:53:01 +0800,Khem Raj 写道: > > On (14/01/10 17:19), Guo Hongruan wrote: > >> After changing this way, the native tools can be shared with > >> different buildings. > > > > They get shared even now. I have my TM

Re: [oe] [PATCH] Support building all project in one directory

2010-01-14 Thread Mike Westerhof
Guo Hongruan wrote: > After applying my patch, all everything built based on uclibc will be > placed in some directories different with glibc,eglibc. The stamps will > be placed in ${TMPDIR}/stamps/${LIBC}, the package data will be placed > in ${TMPDIR}/pkgdata/${LIBC} and so on. So you can see, wh

[oe] FireFox font problem

2010-01-14 Thread Gary Thomas
I'm running the latest (development) BeagleBoard image. I can't seem to get FireFox to render fonts correctly. If you visit this page http://www.w3schools.com/css/css_font.asp, it shows the various font families, etc. However, when I run it on the BeagleBoard, all I get is the default font, wha

Re: [oe] TSC Meeting 7/1/2010

2010-01-14 Thread Denys Dmytriyenko
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 10:02:57AM +0100, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote: > I suggest to review the rules;. E.g. this one: > # This should all be on one line and you should leave an empty line > before any detailed commit information. > Nice, but if you use git commit and enter your message empty lines a

Re: [oe] [PATCH] Support building all project in one directory

2010-01-14 Thread Guo Hongruan
在 Fri, 15 Jan 2010 03:53:01 +0800,Khem Raj 写道: On (14/01/10 17:19), Guo Hongruan wrote: After changing this way, the native tools can be shared with different buildings. They get shared even now. I have my TMPDIR = /scratch/oe/build and DEPLOY_DIR = ${TMPDIR}/deploy/${LIBC} I share the nati

[oe] illume-image

2010-01-14 Thread GNUtoo
hi, every time I build the illume image I've the following failures: First failure: -- The first failure is about libefso and its deps,it has missing includes and so it fails,long time ago I tried to fix it but at a point I abandonned,so is it ok to remove the following from illume-im

[oe] [PATCH] wpa-gui: add version 0.6.9 (Qt4 based)

2010-01-14 Thread Christian Rüb
This is version 0.6.9 of wpa-gui (Qt4), not the old one. If you think the package should be named qpa-gui-qt4, please tell me. The stylesheet is made for SHR only as the application does not fit the screen otherwise (font way to big). Cheers, Christian diff --git a/recipes/wpa-supplicant/wpa-

Re: [oe] Adding a new Machine question

2010-01-14 Thread Perepelica Alexander
After some conf changes I get unknown device sda - but I look at kernel config seems all is ok * Khem Raj [Thu, 14 Jan 2010 12:25:41 -0800]: On (14/01/10 09:45), Martyn Welch wrote: > Perepelica Alexander wrote: > > When I try boot image in qemu I see > > booting kernel ... and nothing. > > D

Re: [oe] Adding a new Machine question

2010-01-14 Thread Khem Raj
On (14/01/10 09:45), Martyn Welch wrote: > Perepelica Alexander wrote: > > When I try boot image in qemu I see > > booting kernel ... and nothing. > > Did you set the console properly. i.e. -append "console=ttyS0" on qemu invocation ? ___ Openembedded-d

Re: [oe] [PATCH 1/2] u-boot_git.bb: Change SRC_URI to a valid location for beagleboard.

2010-01-14 Thread Khem Raj
On (14/01/10 11:49), Cliff Brake wrote: > On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 8:35 AM, Philip Balister wrote: > > On 01/13/2010 10:00 AM, Cliff Brake wrote: > >> So what is the path forward on this issue? > > > > Try the top of the official u-boot repo, not the TI one. I keep meaning to > > try this, but am n

Re: [oe] [PATCH] Support building all project in one directory

2010-01-14 Thread Khem Raj
On (14/01/10 17:19), Guo Hongruan wrote: > After changing this way, the native tools can be shared with > different buildings. They get shared even now. I have my TMPDIR = /scratch/oe/build and DEPLOY_DIR = ${TMPDIR}/deploy/${LIBC} I share the native tools all the time -Khem ___

Re: [oe] current state of OE dev branch?

2010-01-14 Thread Koen Kooi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 14-01-10 15:45, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > later today, i'll take another shot at building the BB-demo-image. > based on whatever gets "git pull"ed at the time, is there any > still-known breakage? in my case, for f12 since i know full well tha

Re: [oe] [PATCH 1/2] u-boot_git.bb: Change SRC_URI to a valid location for beagleboard.

2010-01-14 Thread Cliff Brake
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 8:35 AM, Philip Balister wrote: > On 01/13/2010 10:00 AM, Cliff Brake wrote: >> So what is the path forward on this issue? > > Try the top of the official u-boot repo, not the TI one. I keep meaning to > try this, but am not getting to it. Not much better -- guess I'm simp

Re: [oe] RFC: Sane default for SPLASH

2010-01-14 Thread Michael 'Mickey' Lauer
Acked-By: Michael 'Mickey' Lauer -- :M: ___ Openembedded-devel mailing list Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel

Re: [oe] OE/bitbake and python 3?

2010-01-14 Thread Michael 'Mickey' Lauer
Am Donnerstag, den 14.01.2010, 09:47 -0500 schrieb Robert P. J. Day: > as i'm currently playing with python 3 but also digging my way thru > bitbake, are there any obvious incompatibilities between bitbake/OE > and python 3? i'm assuming there is absolutely no guarantee that > bitbake/OE will run

Re: [oe] OE/bitbake and python 3?

2010-01-14 Thread Holger Hans Peter Freyther
On Thursday 14 January 2010 15:47:35 Robert P. J. Day wrote: > as i'm currently playing with python 3 but also digging my way thru > bitbake, are there any obvious incompatibilities between bitbake/OE > and python 3? i'm assuming there is absolutely no guarantee that > bitbake/OE will run under

Re: [oe] [RFC][PATCH] Move udev cache creation after checkroot

2010-01-14 Thread Koen Kooi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 It received 2 Acks, no NAKs, works well in the field: it's applied now On 12-01-10 14:54, Koen Kooi wrote: > Hi, > > What's your opinion on attached (untested) patch? If there's some > consensus that this is a step in the right direction I'll create

Re: [oe] console-image

2010-01-14 Thread saleh usman
But I've a basic linux system runing on my board then still I've any need of bitbaiking console-iamge? if not then what procedure I should adopt for porting ossie. can bitbaking only ossie related files will work or any other way? saleh On 01/14/2010 09:46 AM, saleh usman wrote: > > What co

Re: [oe] console-image

2010-01-14 Thread Philip Balister
On 01/14/2010 09:46 AM, saleh usman wrote: What console-image actually does.There is a little information about it in openembedded manual. Read the bb file. Basically, it is an image that provides a basic linux system with most of the familiar command line utilities. Philip Saleh

[oe] OE/bitbake and python 3?

2010-01-14 Thread Robert P. J. Day
as i'm currently playing with python 3 but also digging my way thru bitbake, are there any obvious incompatibilities between bitbake/OE and python 3? i'm assuming there is absolutely no guarantee that bitbake/OE will run under python 3. rday --

[oe] console-image

2010-01-14 Thread saleh usman
What console-image actually does.There is a little information about it in openembedded manual. Saleh _ Windows Live Hotmail: Your friends can get your Facebook updates, right from Hotmail®

[oe] current state of OE dev branch?

2010-01-14 Thread Robert P. J. Day
later today, i'll take another shot at building the BB-demo-image. based on whatever gets "git pull"ed at the time, is there any still-known breakage? in my case, for f12 since i know full well that other distros sometimes have no problem. before i try to build, i'll clean e2fsprogs, mplayer

[oe] console-image problem

2010-01-14 Thread saleh usman
Hi I've built helloworld and its exucatble is runing on my board.Since linux is runnig on my board so I don't have any need of u-boot,kernel and file systme then still I've to build console-iamge? I want to port OSSIE(open source SCA imlementation embeddeb) on Davinci SOC and executable of hell

Re: [oe] RFC: Sane default for SPLASH

2010-01-14 Thread Philip Balister
On 01/14/2010 09:12 AM, Koen Kooi wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 14-01-10 14:52, Michael 'Mickey' Lauer wrote: Am Donnerstag, den 14.01.2010, 10:14 +0100 schrieb Koen Kooi: NAK, the needless SPLASH -> BOOTSPLASH will create too much work for people to catch up to, and

Re: [oe] RFC: Sane default for SPLASH

2010-01-14 Thread Koen Kooi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 14-01-10 14:52, Michael 'Mickey' Lauer wrote: > Am Donnerstag, den 14.01.2010, 10:14 +0100 schrieb Koen Kooi: >> NAK, the needless SPLASH -> BOOTSPLASH will create too much work for >> people to catch up to, and it messes up the docs on the subject.

Re: [oe] RFC: Sane default for SPLASH

2010-01-14 Thread Koen Kooi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 14-01-10 14:48, Rolf Leggewie wrote: > Koen Kooi wrote: >> NAK, the needless SPLASH -> BOOTSPLASH will create too much work for >> people to catch up to, and it messes up the docs on the subject. > > With respect to "needless", the reasons for the

Re: [oe] TSC Meeting 7/1/2010

2010-01-14 Thread Philip Balister
On 01/14/2010 04:02 AM, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote: Commit messages were mentioned. It should be clear from reading the commit message what the change applies to and why its necessary. The TSC will start naming and shaming people making lousy commit messages and reserve the right to impose sanctio

Re: [oe] TSC Meeting 7/1/2010

2010-01-14 Thread Guo Hongruan
在 Thu, 14 Jan 2010 06:22:17 +0800,Richard Purdie 写道: The QA issues are not something the TSC can really "rule" on. Yes testing is good but we have no hardware or human resources we can assign to this. Where a regression is identified as being from a particular commit, it is expected the regre

Re: [oe] RFC: Sane default for SPLASH

2010-01-14 Thread Michael 'Mickey' Lauer
Am Donnerstag, den 14.01.2010, 10:14 +0100 schrieb Koen Kooi: > NAK, the needless SPLASH -> BOOTSPLASH will create too much work for > people to catch up to, and it messes up the docs on the subject. Could you expand on that reason? I find the patch quite a useful refactoring. If we don't allow pa

Re: [oe] RFC: Sane default for SPLASH

2010-01-14 Thread Rolf Leggewie
Koen Kooi wrote: > NAK, the needless SPLASH -> BOOTSPLASH will create too much work for > people to catch up to, and it messes up the docs on the subject. With respect to "needless", the reasons for the change were given in this thread. Please revisit the discussion. And in any case, the tremend

Re: [oe] Does OE’s Angstrom Linux support SMP (Sy mmetric multiprocessing) on beagle board.

2010-01-14 Thread Philip Balister
On 01/13/2010 10:06 AM, gagan singh wrote: Hi Phil, Thanks for the response. So you recon Asynchronous Multi-Processing (AMP) concept is better suited in beagle board configuration. If so what exactly I have to do in angstom to get such thing working. regards Read up on dspli

Re: [oe] [PATCH 1/2] u-boot_git.bb: Change SRC_URI to a valid location for beagleboard.

2010-01-14 Thread Philip Balister
On 01/13/2010 10:00 AM, Cliff Brake wrote: On Thu, Dec 24, 2009 at 6:56 PM, Philip Balister wrote: On 12/24/2009 12:28 PM, Khem Raj wrote: On Thu, Dec 24, 2009 at 1:36 AM, Koen Kooi wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 NAK, uboot_git.bb should fetch from git. It was int

Re: [oe] Qt4 GLES (once again)

2010-01-14 Thread Martin Jansa
With qt4 providers set only in compatibility-providers-conf and default versions (no P_V for qt4 packages). I got lots of bitbake errors like this: NOTE: Runtime target 'qt4-x11-free-gles' is unbuildable, removing... Missing or unbuildable dependency chain was: ['qt4-x11-free-gles', 'virtual/egl

[oe] CUPS 1.4.2 recipe

2010-01-14 Thread Jay Snyder
I am going to be submitting revisions to the CUPS recipes, including a new version, 1.4.2. I also have revisions for Gutenprint, and GS. This email is primarily a test, as prior attempts to post have been bounced. Regards, Jay Snyder ___ Openembedd

[oe] rm_work.bbclass causes the incremental building impossible

2010-01-14 Thread Guo Hongruan
Hi guys, I want to do incremental building when openembedded recipe changes. But I found that when adding INHERIT += "rm_work" in local.conf, bitbake always building lots of packages which recipes never were changed. I verified it with the newest openembedded 667b7cb389a4cd8677fe5272f16c

Re: [oe] TSC Meeting 7/1/2010

2010-01-14 Thread Mark Brown
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 10:22:17PM +, Richard Purdie wrote: > Patches were mentioned. The TSC is encouraging patches to have headers > with information about who wrote them, when, why and if taken from > somewhere else, where this was. Debian has a draft standard for this: http://dep

Re: [oe] Adding a new Machine question

2010-01-14 Thread Martyn Welch
Perepelica Alexander wrote: > When I try boot image in qemu I see > booting kernel ... and nothing. > I'm afraid I have no experience with using qemu, so I don't think I can really make any suggestions at this point. Martyn > > 14.01.2010 10:59, Martyn Welch пишет: >> Perepelica Alexander wrote:

Re: [oe] Adding a new Machine question

2010-01-14 Thread Andrea Adami
Hello, >> At a guess (as you haven't provided any specifics) I'd guess that you >> need to look at the kernel configuration. right Setting DEFAULT_PREFERENCE_yourmachine = "1" is not enough: you have to provide a specific defconfig for your machine, in a subdir of linux-2.6.32+2.6.33-rc4 Actually

Re: [oe] Adding a new Machine question

2010-01-14 Thread Perepelica Alexander
When I try boot image in qemu I see booting kernel ... and nothing. 14.01.2010 10:59, Martyn Welch пишет: Perepelica Alexander wrote: Thank you, Martyn! I remove my changes from linux_2.6.32+2.6.33-rc3.bb and I build was successful but don't boot with image :( - all hangs At what p

Re: [oe] [PATCH] Support building all project in one directory

2010-01-14 Thread Guo Hongruan
After changing this way, the native tools can be shared with different buildings. 在 Thu, 14 Jan 2010 17:14:53 +0800,Marcin Juszkiewicz 写道: Dnia czwartek, 14 stycznia 2010 o 08:55:39 Guo Hongruan napisał(a): * Append ${LIBC} to CACHE, STAMP, WORKDIR, STAGING_DIR and CROSS_DIR defination,

Re: [oe] [PATCH] Support building all project in one directory

2010-01-14 Thread Marcin Juszkiewicz
Dnia czwartek, 14 stycznia 2010 o 08:55:39 Guo Hongruan napisał(a): > * Append ${LIBC} to CACHE, STAMP, WORKDIR, STAGING_DIR and CROSS_DIR > defination, so that package building with different libc will not bother > each other. How does it differ from TMPDIR = "tmp/${LIBC}/" setting in local.con

Re: [oe] RFC: Sane default for SPLASH

2010-01-14 Thread Koen Kooi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 NAK, the needless SPLASH -> BOOTSPLASH will create too much work for people to catch up to, and it messes up the docs on the subject. On 14-01-10 01:38, Rolf Leggewie wrote: > diff --git a/classes/image.bbclass b/classes/image.bbclass > index ab58031.

Re: [oe] Adding a new Machine question

2010-01-14 Thread Martyn Welch
Perepelica Alexander wrote: > Thank you, Martyn! > I remove my changes from linux_2.6.32+2.6.33-rc3.bb and I build was > successful but don't boot with image :( - all hangs At what point does it hang? At a guess (as you haven't provided any specifics) I'd guess that you need to look at the kerne

Re: [oe] TSC Meeting 7/1/2010

2010-01-14 Thread Frans Meulenbroeks
Richard, Thanks for making the minutes available. A short reaction on a few things: > > Current Issues > == > > We did discuss the IMAGE_BOOT issue. We decided that weak defaults (?=) > in the class where the variables are used is a good thing and that the > current structure is pretty