On Mon, Feb 08, 2010 at 09:56:26PM +, Phil Blundell wrote:
On Mon, 2010-02-08 at 22:14 +0100, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
# Use gcc for linking so LDFLAGS actually makes sense
-LD = ${CC} -nostdlib
+#LD = ${CC} -nostdlib
Thanks for the patch. When you say nowadays, do you know
On Tue, 2010-02-09 at 09:50 +0100, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
It seems that the .dev tree has 1.2.1, 1.2.2, 1.3.1 still in there but
i, personally would strongly advise against using those (same for the
standalone tinylogin, but that's a different thing and not relevant
right now).
As
On Mon, Feb 08, 2010 at 08:50:12PM +0100, Petr Štetiar wrote:
This patch fixes configure error, complaining about missing config.rpath file
which gets deleted by autofoo in recipe, so to avoid error bellow we create
empty file, making configure happy.
configure.ac:104: required file
Dnia wtorek, 9 lutego 2010 o 01:43:32 Petr Štetiar napisał(a):
Signed-off-by: Petr Štetiar yn...@true.cz
---
recipes/linux/linux_2.6.24.bb |4 ++--
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/recipes/linux/linux_2.6.24.bb b/recipes/linux/linux_2.6.24.bb
index
On Tue, 2010-02-09 at 01:43 +0100, Petr Štetiar wrote:
-DEFAULT_PREFERENCE_ts72xx = 1
+DEFAULT_PREFERENCE_ts72xx = -1
DEFAULT_PREFERENCE_hipox = 1
DEFAULT_PREFERENCE_cs-e9302 = 1
DEFAULT_PREFERENCE_smartq5 = 1
-PR = r34
+PR = r35
There's no need to increment PR if the only thing you
Frans Meulenbroeks ha scritto, Il 08/02/2010 19:24:
Hi all,
Made a few pics @ fosdem. They can be found at
http://picasaweb.google.com/fransmeulenbroeks/Fosdem2010?authkey=Gv1sRgCPfSh7qcjv2siQE#
(and Tanenbaum is a little bit dark, my flash is not too powerful).
Frans
Thank you
/marco
Signed-off-by: Petr Štetiar yn...@true.cz
---
.../linux/linux-2.6.24/ts72xx/ep93xx-i2c-bus.diff | 30 +-
.../ts72xx/ep93xx-maverick-uniqid.patch| 14 +-
.../ts72xx/ts72xx-machine-id-fix.patch |8 +-
.../linux/linux-2.6.24/ts72xx/ts72xx-rs485.patch | 268
On Mon, Feb 08, 2010 at 10:14:23PM +0100, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
-if [ $VERBOSE != no ]
+if [ $VERBOSE != no ]
I don't see any need for this change. Why doesn't the commit message does
not explain why it was done?
I assume it is a stylistic change only
On Mon, 2010-02-08 at 22:14 +0100, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
quilt tries to use an RFC822 date format which is obsoleted
by rfc2822 since 8 years now.
It has a builtin date handler, so use that and not the date
binary (which may only support rfc2822 by now, as busybox does)
Thanks for
I'm a bit confused about netbase and udev use im Angstrom.
Here's what i see:
I connect an USB-NIC.
/etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules is created:
# This file was automatically generated by the /lib/udev/write_net_rules
# program, run by the persistent-net-generator.rules rules file.
Am Dienstag, den 09.02.2010, 12:23 +0100 schrieb Steffen Sledz:
I'm a bit confused about netbase and udev use im Angstrom.
Here's what i see:
I connect an USB-NIC.
/etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules is created:
[…]
And for each new NIC another name is created?! :(
And here's
On Mon, 2010-02-08 at 22:14 +0100, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
Signed-off-by: Bernhard Reutner-Fischer rep.dot@gmail.com
---
recipes/busybox/busybox.inc |6 +++---
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
Thanks for the patch. I checked this in.
p.
Paul Menzel wrote:
And here's what i like to see:
* Connect an USB-NIC should result in an DHCP-configured interface.
Do you have it configured somewhere (for example in [2])? If not you can
use a daemon like NetworkManager.
...
[2] /etc/network/interfaces
It's the Angstrom standard
Steffen Sledz sl...@dresearch.de [2010-02-09 14:18:08]:
# Wired or wireless interfaces
auto eth0
iface eth0 inet dhcp
iface eth1 inet dhcp
But i'm not sure what this part means (especially what means 'auto'
here. Where can i found some documentation about the content of this
config
Petr Štetiar wrote:
man 5 interfaces?
Not at openSUSE. :(
But the internet found it for me. :)
And another problem is the mentioned naming. If every connected
USB-NIC gets a new name i cannot refer to it in this config file.
You can get unique name/symlink using udev rule.
Do you have
I'm trying to build parted 1.8.8 on OE:
NOTE: Running task 551 of 565 (ID: 3,
/home/oe/2009-12-04/openembedded/recipes/parted/parted_1.8.8.bb, do_unpack)
NOTE: Running task 552 of 565 (ID: 13,
/home/oe/2009-12-04/openembedded/recipes/parted/parted_1.8.8.bb,
do_distribute_sources)
NOTE:
Hi,
Here's my setup:
htcdream.conf
shr.conf
org.openembedded.dev branch at afc0667965549d0ac1cc5cd93a30c2aa8e47dc28
bitbake gdb-cross
I did the following:
the following 3 devices are implicated:
*1 build laptop
*1 desktop
*1 htcdream
The htcdream is connected to the desktop which is on the same
- BBCLASSEXTEND used for native version
- DEPENDS = file-native needs to be added for target package
Signed-off-by: Marcin Juszkiewicz mar...@juszkiewicz.com.pl
---
recipes/file/file_5.04.bb | 12
1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
create mode 100644
Signed-off-by: Marcin Juszkiewicz mar...@juszkiewicz.com.pl
---
recipes/gcc/gcc-cross-initial_csl-arm-2007q3.bb|6 ++
.../gcc/gcc-cross-intermediate_csl-arm-2007q3.bb |6 ++
recipes/gcc/gcc-cross_csl-arm-2007q3.bb|2 +-
recipes/gcc/gcc_csl-arm-2007q3.bb
hi,in the gdb series here's the sdk:
ldd
.../oetmp/work/i686-armv6-novfp-sdk-oe-linux-gnueabi/gdb-cross-sdk-7.0-r0/image/
usr/local/shr/arm/bin/arm-oe-linux-gnueabi-gdb
linux-gate.so.1 = (0xb80df000)
libncurses.so.5
=
Another way of looking at Holder's response is that we feel we could do a
better job of supporting people using OE to do software development. There
are certainly ways to use OE to do SW development.
agreed. I really wanted to be cautious regarding my comment since I've
gotten such great
In otherwords has anyone had any success with making one image depend upon a
2nd image?
if you what did you do to make that work.
mike
On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 4:37 PM, John Van Horne (vanhorj)
vanh...@cisco.comwrote:
The system I'm working on boots up with an initramfs image which
contains a
Yes we succeeded but this is far from being optimal in our case.
We have two recipes: opennao-image and nao-initramfs-image.
In opennao-image.bb:
DEPENDS = nao-initramfs-image
IMAGE_PREPROCESS_COMMAND += do_copy_initrd
do_copy_initrd() {
install -d
ah we do the combining of the two images in a postprocess step after the 2nd
image...
but I wonder if we are to make a dummy preprocess step that will make a
difference...
not sure why that would work.
we'll give it a try.. which version of bitbake are you using?
On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 10:36
The default is to depend on populate_staging because the output from
that task is, in general, what other packages need in order to build.
But you can make your recipe depend on another task if you want; try (in
your initramfs recipe):
do_fetch[depends] = cramfs-image:do_rootfs
p.
works
On (09/02/10 18:25), GNUtoo wrote:
Hi,
Here's my setup:
htcdream.conf
shr.conf
org.openembedded.dev branch at afc0667965549d0ac1cc5cd93a30c2aa8e47dc28
bitbake gdb-cross
I did the following:
the following 3 devices are implicated:
*1 build laptop
*1 desktop
*1 htcdream
The htcdream
On (09/02/10 18:38), Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote:
Signed-off-by: Marcin Juszkiewicz mar...@juszkiewicz.com.pl
Acked-by: Khem Raj raj.k...@gmail.com
---
recipes/glibc/glibc_2.5.bb |3 ++-
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/recipes/glibc/glibc_2.5.bb
OE weekly changelog 2010-02-01 to 2010-02-08
Andrea Adami (5):
zaurus-updater: fix nandlogical writing of kernel. Bump PR.
linux-kexecboot_2.6.32: remove now obsoleted Zaurus patches. Re-enable LZO/L
linux-kexecboot_2.6.32+2.6.33-rc6: remove now obsoleted Zaurus patches.
linux-kexecboot:
On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 6:23 AM, Steffen Sledz sl...@dresearch.de wrote:
I'm a bit confused about netbase and udev use im Angstrom.
Here's what i see:
I connect an USB-NIC.
/etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules is created:
I ended up just removing the following files from my build, and
On Tue, 2010-02-09 at 12:08 -0800, Khem Raj wrote:
On (08/02/10 12:00), Tom Rini wrote:
On Sat, 2010-02-06 at 13:04 +, Phil Blundell wrote:
On Thu, 2010-02-04 at 11:57 -0600, Tom Rini wrote:
On Thu, 2010-02-04 at 12:22 -0500, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote:
On Thu, Feb 04, 2010 at
On Tue, Feb 09, 2010 at 06:55:31PM +0100, GNUtoo wrote:
hi,in the gdb series here's the sdk:
ldd
.../oetmp/work/i686-armv6-novfp-sdk-oe-linux-gnueabi/gdb-cross-sdk-7.0-r0/image/
usr/local/shr/arm/bin/arm-oe-linux-gnueabi-gdb
linux-gate.so.1 = (0xb80df000)
libncurses.so.5
=
C Michael Sundius wrote:
Further, I wonder if there are others out there who also feel
this way? My understanding is that Monta Vista is using OE; are there voices
on this list from MV or others that use OE for creating a consistent means
of building for developers and Config/Release Managers?
Am Dienstag, den 09.02.2010, 16:38 +0100 schrieb Steffen Sledz:
Petr Štetiar wrote:
man 5 interfaces?
[…]
OK, i try to solve one problem after the other. Let's accept that
every new USB-NIC gets a new name for now (using a pool of interface names).
I've tried to create a
On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 1:47 PM, Michael Smith msm...@cbnco.com wrote:
C Michael Sundius wrote:
Further, I wonder if there are others out there who also feel
this way? My understanding is that Monta Vista is using OE; are there
voices
on this list from MV or others that use OE for creating a
We are also attempting to use BitBake +OE for development. We have a
several packagaes (a hypervisor, a kernel patched to use that
hypervisor, some libraries that act as glue between the two, and some
bits for bootloading) that are under active development, and build
several customised root
On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 2:33 PM, Peter Chubb peter.ch...@nicta.com.auwrote:
We are also attempting to use BitBake +OE for development. We have a
several packagaes (a hypervisor, a kernel patched to use that
hypervisor, some libraries that act as glue between the two, and some
bits for
Creates gobject interfaces out of DBus XML specifications.
Signed-off-by: Steffen Sledz sl...@dresearch.de
---
conf/checksums.ini |4
.../vala-dbus-binding-tool.inc | 10 ++
.../vala-dbus-binding-tool_0.1.3.bb
After sending my suggestion for a patch i've detected that there
exists a vala-dbus-binding-tool-native_git recipe below
recipes/freesmartphone.
Shouldn't we join both in recipes/vala-dbus-binding-tool?
Steffen
___
Openembedded-devel mailing list
2010/2/10 Ruud Althuizen r...@il.fontys.nl:
Hello,
On Wed 03 Feb 2010 12:16 PM, Ruud Althuizen wrote:
On Wed 03 Feb 2010 12:07 PM, Paul Menzel wrote:
Am Mittwoch, den 03.02.2010, 11:48 +0100 schrieb Ruud Althuizen:
In the attached patches there is a machine config and kernel recipe for
39 matches
Mail list logo
