[oe] install problem with attr-2.4.44

Install stage for attr-2.4.44 fails for me with: | make -C attr install | make[1]: Entering directory `/home/DRESEARCH/production/METABUILD/20100215190003-hydraip-build-7715/OE/tmp.5/work/armv5te-angstrom-linux-gnueabi/attr-2.4.44-r1/attr-2.4.44/attr' | ../include/install-sh -o production -g doma

Re: [oe] [PATCH] vala-dbus-binding-tool: (mostly) new recipe

> Maybe this is a bug autotools_stage and this dependency should be generated > automatically like autoconf-native, automake-native, and libtool-native? I started i new thread on this: Steffen ___

[oe] intltool/autotools problem?

While creating new recipes for vala-dbus-binding-tool (see thread ) we mentioned the following problem. I started a new thread for this because i believe this is a common one. Martin Jansa wrote: > > BTW: I noticed a bit

[oe] Cleanup / janitors

Greetings all, Per discussion in the TSC meeting this month, I'm sending out this email as a probe. Would anyone on the list benefit from a "janitors" type project, to outline and document specific cleanup tasks and how they should be done? There are many tasks that need doing which involve editi

Re: [oe] Using bitbake in minimal chroot environment

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 15-02-10 23:04, Tom Rini wrote: > On Mon, 2010-02-15 at 19:43 +0100, Koen Kooi wrote: > > [snip] >> On a recent intel/amd cpu VMs I can't measure much difference between VM >> and non-vm builds. >> My main buildmachine at work is an ubuntu 8.04LTS

Re: [oe] Using bitbake in minimal chroot environment

On Mon, 2010-02-15 at 19:43 +0100, Koen Kooi wrote: [snip] > On a recent intel/amd cpu VMs I can't measure much difference between VM > and non-vm builds. > My main buildmachine at work is an ubuntu 8.04LTS vm running under > windows XP. The only major speedup I can get building in a native > inst

Re: [oe] [PATCH] netkit-base: fix building with gcc4

Hello. Sorry for the late reply. I was going to test and apply your patch, but it is line wrapped and I failed fixing it up by hand. On Thu, 2009-10-29 at 15:36, pieterg wrote: > --- > > I guess nobody has been using netkit-base for a while, it needs the > following patch to allow it to be buil

Re: [oe] Using bitbake in minimal chroot environment

2010/2/15 Koen Kooi : > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 15-02-10 18:19, Martin Jansa wrote: >> On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 05:59:39PM +0100, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote: > I'm just thinking about using bitbake only in minimalistic chroot. >> >> Already rebuilding in new chroot :

Re: [oe] shared-mime-info-native-0.51 do_compile failure

On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 11:41:39AM -0800, ed wrote: > Trying to build image for mini2440 and get the following error. > > NOTE: Running task 694 of 2862 (ID: > 1434, > /home/ed/mini2440/OE/openembedded/recipes/shared-mime-info/shared-mime-info-native_0.51.bb, > do_compile) > ERROR: function do_c

Re: [oe] [PATCH] linux.inc: add device tree for xilinx ml507 Signed-off-by: aalonso

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi! It seems you fell victim to the "git needs blank line between summarry and body" maffia and git put everything in the subject line. Could you regenerate and resend please? regards, Koen On 15-02-10 21:15, aalonso wrote: > --- > recipes/linux/l

Re: [oe] [PATCH 07/12] Document proxy setup in local.conf.sample

On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 01:08:20PM +0100, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote: > On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 04:04:37AM -0500, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: > >On Mon, Feb 08, 2010 at 10:14:28PM +0100, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote: > >> diff --git a/conf/local.conf.sample b/conf/local.conf.sample > >> index 64

[oe] [PATCH] xilinx-ml507.conf: New config for xilinx ml507 devboard Signed-off-by: aalonso

--- conf/machine/xilinx-ml507.conf | 33 + 1 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) create mode 100644 conf/machine/xilinx-ml507.conf diff --git a/conf/machine/xilinx-ml507.conf b/conf/machine/xilinx-ml507.conf new file mode 100644 index 000..c376cf

[oe] [PATCH] xilinx-bsp.bbclass: add support for xilinx ml507 Signed-off-by: aalonso

--- classes/xilinx-bsp.bbclass | 56 +-- 1 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-) diff --git a/classes/xilinx-bsp.bbclass b/classes/xilinx-bsp.bbclass index f657e5b..c719b3b 100644 --- a/classes/xilinx-bsp.bbclass +++ b/classes/xilinx-bsp.bbclas

[oe] [PATCH] tune-ppc440.inc: add ppc440 to PACKAGE_EXTRA_ARCHS Signed-off-by: aalonso

--- conf/machine/include/tune-ppc440.inc |2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/conf/machine/include/tune-ppc440.inc b/conf/machine/include/tune-ppc440.inc index feca186..0c41db4 100644 --- a/conf/machine/include/tune-ppc440.inc +++ b/conf/machine/include/tune-p

[oe] [PATCH] linux.inc: add device tree for xilinx ml507 Signed-off-by: aalonso

--- recipes/linux/linux.inc |1 + 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/recipes/linux/linux.inc b/recipes/linux/linux.inc index 7405c08..b562657 100644 --- a/recipes/linux/linux.inc +++ b/recipes/linux/linux.inc @@ -38,6 +38,7 @@ KERNEL_DEVICETREE_mpc8313e-rdb = "arch

Re: [oe] Update state in Patchwork. (was: [PATCH] meta-toolchain: Run rmdir only if empty dirs are actually found.)

On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 06:12:33PM +0100, Paul Menzel wrote: > Am Sonntag, den 14.02.2010, 17:37 +0100 schrieb Michael Lippautz: > > >> 2. Update the state. > > > > > > How? The webinterface does not offer my the functionality to change the > > > state. I > > > guess it is because I'm not in the r

Re: [oe] [PATCH 2/2] ruby: fix 1.8.7-p248 compile

* Update ruby library path so extensions needing mkmf can build and find the right ruby headers. Fixes building of ext/dl. diff --git a/recipes/ruby/files/extmk.patch b/recipes/ruby/files/extmk.patch new file mode 100644 index 000..8b68450 --- /dev/null +++ b/recipes/ruby/files/extmk.patch

[oe] [PATCH 1/2] python: fix SSL for 2.6

Hi all, I am new to the mailing list and I have a couple of patches to contribute. This fixes SSL support for python 2.6. Looks like the python module for SSL was missing from the package. Thanks, Jesse * Add SSL module to build -- fixes "import ssl" diff --git a/contrib/python/generate-manif

Re: [oe] [PATCH] add xilinx ml507 machine

Oops didn't know about the commit guide lines. Actually I haven't found a guideline my self but some of the things that are needed to support xilinx dev board are: Linux kernel recipe with the ability to specify to build a simpleImage so we can program the fpga with a Jtag u-boot recipe to preser

Re: [oe] Using bitbake in minimal chroot environment

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 15-02-10 18:19, Martin Jansa wrote: > On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 05:59:39PM +0100, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote: I'm just thinking about using bitbake only in minimalistic chroot. > > Already rebuilding in new chroot :). > What are advanta

Re: [oe] Using bitbake in minimal chroot environment

On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 12:22:56PM -0600, Mike Westerhof wrote: > So my conclusion is that I/O is not the bottleneck for my OE builds, and > that's the only area where a VM is significantly different in terms of > performance (at least how I use VMs; perhaps other builds may observe > differences).

Re: [oe] Using bitbake in minimal chroot environment

Frans Meulenbroeks wrote: > 2010/2/15 Martin Jansa : >>> Seems a good plan to me, please keep us posted. >>> (actually I've been considering building in a minimalistic VM) >> Well VM would be much slower.. > > Someone else told me the same today. > What exactly causes this? I would expect I/O to b

Re: [oe] [PATCH] add xilinx ml507 machine

Can you make the commit log examples look like this: http://wiki.openembedded.net/index.php/Commit_log_example Do you know of any guides that could help me test this on my ml403? I would love to test this stuff! Philip On 02/15/2010 09:42 AM, Adrian Alonso wrote: From: aalonso --- conf/m

Re: [oe] Using bitbake in minimal chroot environment

On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 06:57:22PM +0100, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote: > Someone else told me the same today. > What exactly causes this? I would expect I/O to be the differentiating > factor as memory access and executing instructions should take the > same time, shouldn't it? AFAIK virtualized I/O

[oe] [PATCH] ml507 xilinx bsp update

From: aalonso --- classes/xilinx-bsp.bbclass | 56 +-- 1 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-) diff --git a/classes/xilinx-bsp.bbclass b/classes/xilinx-bsp.bbclass index f657e5b..c719b3b 100644 --- a/classes/xilinx-bsp.bbclass +++ b/classes/x

[oe] [PATCH] device tree for xilinx ml507

From: aalonso --- recipes/linux/linux.inc |1 + 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/recipes/linux/linux.inc b/recipes/linux/linux.inc index 7405c08..b562657 100644 --- a/recipes/linux/linux.inc +++ b/recipes/linux/linux.inc @@ -38,6 +38,7 @@ KERNEL_DEVICETREE_mpc83

[oe] [PATCH] add xilinx ml507 machine

From: aalonso --- conf/machine/include/tune-ppc440.inc |2 +- conf/machine/xilinx-ml507.conf | 33 + 2 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) create mode 100644 conf/machine/xilinx-ml507.conf diff --git a/conf/machine/include/tune-ppc440.inc

Re: [oe] Using bitbake in minimal chroot environment

2010/2/15 Martin Jansa : > On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 05:59:39PM +0100, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote: >> >> I'm just thinking about using bitbake only in minimalistic chroot. > > Already rebuilding in new chroot :). > >> >> >> >> What are advantages/disadvantages? >> >> >> >> How I see it: >> >> >> >> Adv

Re: [oe] Using bitbake in minimal chroot environment

On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 05:59:39PM +0100, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote: > >> I'm just thinking about using bitbake only in minimalistic chroot. Already rebuilding in new chroot :). > >> > >> What are advantages/disadvantages? > >> > >> How I see it: > >> > >> Advantages: > >> 1) more secure (I starte

Re: [oe] Using bitbake in minimal chroot environment

2010/2/15 Philip Balister : > On 02/14/2010 05:56 AM, Martin Jansa wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> I'm just thinking about using bitbake only in minimalistic chroot. >> >> What are advantages/disadvantages? >> >> How I see it: >> >> Advantages: >> 1) more secure (I started to use separate user for bitbake,

[oe] OE weekly changelog 2010-02-08 to 2010-02-15

OE weekly changelog 2010-02-08 to 2010-02-15 Andrea Adami (5): linux-kexecboot_2.6.32+2.6.33-rc6: minor defconfig cleanings for Zaurus zaurus-kernels: move the kernel size check to linux-kexecboot.inc. initramfs-kexecboot.inc: remove RDEPENDS_kernel-base = "kernel-image" initramfs-kexecboo

Re: [oe] Using bitbake in minimal chroot environment

On 02/14/2010 05:56 AM, Martin Jansa wrote: Hi, I'm just thinking about using bitbake only in minimalistic chroot. What are advantages/disadvantages? How I see it: Advantages: 1) more secure (I started to use separate user for bitbake, when I started to play with bitbake master instead re

Re: [oe] [PATCH] vala-dbus-binding-tool: (mostly) new recipe

Martin Jansa wrote: > BTW: I noticed a bit strange DEPENDS, why is there depend on > intltool-native? and other depends non-native? > > it is expanded like this: > -native: > DEPENDS="autoconf-native automake-native libtool-native > gnu-config-native shasum-native coreutils-native autoconf-native

Re: [oe] [RFC] set PYTHONPATH inside distutils-base.bbclass instead of distutils.bbclass

On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 02:50:12PM +0100, Koen Kooi wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > After some discussion with Richard I committed this: > > http://cgit.openembedded.org/cgit.cgi/openembedded/commit/?id=fd4a161b6095f5b6f83d50d4d979000399944260 > > That seems to solve

Re: [oe] [RFC] set PYTHONPATH inside distutils-base.bbclass instead of distutils.bbclass

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 After some discussion with Richard I committed this: http://cgit.openembedded.org/cgit.cgi/openembedded/commit/?id=fd4a161b6095f5b6f83d50d4d979000399944260 That seems to solve the sympoms I'm seeing, but the underlying problem is still present. On

Re: [oe] [PATCH] vala-dbus-binding-tool: (mostly) new recipe

On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 11:54 AM, Steffen Sledz wrote: > --- a/recipes/freesmartphone/vala-dbus-binding-tool-native_git.bb > -DEPENDS = "vala-native libgee-native intltool-native libxml2-native" > diff --git a/recipes/vala-dbus-binding-tool/vala-dbus-binding-tool.inc > b/recipes/vala-dbus-bindin

Re: [oe] [PATCH] vala-dbus-binding-tool: (mostly) new recipe

Am Montag, den 15.02.2010, 11:54 +0100 schrieb Steffen Sledz: > New recipes for native and non-native build of Vala DBus Binding Tool > integrating earlier recipe from recipes/freesmartphone. > > Signed-off-by: Steffen Sledz Acked-by: Michael 'Mickey' Lauer :M: __

Re: [oe] Miss patches in patch queue

Steffen Sledz wrote: > As mentioned in thread > i > miss all the patches i sent according to this thread in the patch > queue. :( > > Is this a mistake of mine or is there a patchwork problem? Ping __

[oe] [PATCH] vala-dbus-binding-tool: (mostly) new recipe

New recipes for native and non-native build of Vala DBus Binding Tool integrating earlier recipe from recipes/freesmartphone. Signed-off-by: Steffen Sledz --- conf/checksums.ini |4 conf/distro/include/fso-autorev.inc|1 + conf/distro/

[oe] [RFC] set PYTHONPATH inside distutils-base.bbclass instead of distutils.bbclass

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I had a problem with building python-pygobject-native last week which was due to this bit in m4/python.m4 if test -x "$PYTHON-config"; then PYTHON_INCLUDES=`$PYTHON-config --includes 2>/dev/null` else PYTHON_INCLUDES="-I${py_prefix}/include/pytho

Re: [oe] = ? UTF-8 ? B ? Ww== ? =oe= ? UTF-8 ? B ? XQ== ? = How to sane replace a path in a pkgconfig file ?

On Sun, 2010-02-14 at 21:25 +, Phil Blundell wrote: > On Sun, 2010-02-14 at 21:38 +0100, bernhard.guil...@opensimpad.org > wrote: > > for i in `find ${S}/ -name "*.pc" -type f` ; do > > -sed -i -e 's:-L${STAGING_LIBDIR}::g' -e > > 's:-I${STAGING_INCDIR}::g' $i > > +se