Re: [oe] [oe-commits] Graeme Gregory : firefox_3.6.bb : add new version, convert to new staging

2010-02-28 Thread Koen Kooi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 28-02-10 23:41, Tom Rini wrote: > On Sun, 2010-02-28 at 21:08 +, git version control wrote: >> Module: openembedded.git >> Branch: org.openembedded.dev >> Commit: 0ca0394c94028b941603b2d6f7264d3eaaed5a98 >> URL: >> http://gitweb.openembedded

Re: [oe] [RFC} glib-2.0 cleanup

2010-02-28 Thread Frans Meulenbroeks
2010/2/28 Michael 'Mickey' Lauer : > Am Sonntag, den 28.02.2010, 20:39 +0100 schrieb Frans Meulenbroeks: >> We have 26 glib-2.0 recipes (and 8 native ones). (see ls below) >> Only a few versions are used (see also the grep below) >> >> for glib-2.0: >> "2.12.12" >> "2.16.4" >> "2.18.3" >> "2.20.3"

Re: [oe] [RFC] duplicate recipes

2010-02-28 Thread Frans Meulenbroeks
2010/2/28 Graeme Gregory : > Now on to important issues. > > If people are looking for something to keep them busy then there are two > important tasks that need to be completed in OE one of them saves hours > on build times, the other makes parsing quicker. > > Convert as many -native recipes to

Re: [oe] [oe-commits] Graeme Gregory : firefox_3.6.bb : add new version, convert to new staging

2010-02-28 Thread Graeme Gregory
On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 03:41:28PM -0700, Tom Rini wrote: > On Sun, 2010-02-28 at 21:08 +, git version control wrote: > > Module: openembedded.git > > Branch: org.openembedded.dev > > Commit: 0ca0394c94028b941603b2d6f7264d3eaaed5a98 > > URL: > > http://gitweb.openembedded.net/?p=openembedde

Re: [oe] [oe-commits] Graeme Gregory : firefox_3.6.bb : add new version, convert to new staging

2010-02-28 Thread Tom Rini
On Sun, 2010-02-28 at 21:08 +, git version control wrote: > Module: openembedded.git > Branch: org.openembedded.dev > Commit: 0ca0394c94028b941603b2d6f7264d3eaaed5a98 > URL: > http://gitweb.openembedded.net/?p=openembedded.git&a=commit;h=0ca0394c94028b941603b2d6f7264d3eaaed5a98 > > Author:

Re: [oe] [RFC] duplicate recipes

2010-02-28 Thread Graeme Gregory
On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 09:01:45PM +0100, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote: > Below is a list of all recipes that have 5 or more versions. > Guess a lot of these are deadwood. > Proposal is to do some cleaning for these. > > Probably the best scenario is to remove all versions which > - are not the latest

Re: [oe] [PATCH] ezx: Use pulseaudio 0.9.15

2010-02-28 Thread Michael 'Mickey' Lauer
Am Sonntag, den 28.02.2010, 16:49 -0500 schrieb Philip Balister: > On 02/28/2010 02:55 PM, Koen Kooi wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > On 28-02-10 19:57, Antonio Ospite wrote: > >> Pulseaudio versions newer than 0.9.15 don't build on ezx machines (and > >> presuma

Re: [oe] [PATCH] ezx: Use pulseaudio 0.9.15

2010-02-28 Thread Philip Balister
On 02/28/2010 02:55 PM, Koen Kooi wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 28-02-10 19:57, Antonio Ospite wrote: Pulseaudio versions newer than 0.9.15 don't build on ezx machines (and presumably on any armv5te), stick to this version until the problem is handled upstream and a pa

Re: [oe] [RFC] duplicate recipes

2010-02-28 Thread Philip Balister
On 02/28/2010 03:01 PM, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote: Below is a list of all recipes that have 5 or more versions. Guess a lot of these are deadwood. Proposal is to do some cleaning for these. Probably the best scenario is to remove all versions which - are not the latest version - are not pinned w

Re: [oe] [RFC} glib-2.0 cleanup

2010-02-28 Thread Graham Gower
On 1 March 2010 06:56, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote: > 2010/2/28 Koen Kooi : >> >> But more importantly, what harm do the recipes do to you? Does it offend >> you that there are 26 recipes? > > Somewhat yes. Frankly I don't see a use for 26 recipes for all kind of > different versions, some of which a

Re: [oe] [RFC] duplicate recipes

2010-02-28 Thread Michael 'Mickey' Lauer
Am Sonntag, den 28.02.2010, 21:01 +0100 schrieb Frans Meulenbroeks: > Below is a list of all recipes that have 5 or more versions. > Guess a lot of these are deadwood. > Proposal is to do some cleaning for these. > > Probably the best scenario is to remove all versions which > - are not the latest

Re: [oe] [RFC} glib-2.0 cleanup

2010-02-28 Thread Michael 'Mickey' Lauer
Am Sonntag, den 28.02.2010, 20:39 +0100 schrieb Frans Meulenbroeks: > We have 26 glib-2.0 recipes (and 8 native ones). (see ls below) > Only a few versions are used (see also the grep below) > > for glib-2.0: > "2.12.12" > "2.16.4" > "2.18.3" > "2.20.3" > "2.22.1" > "2.22.4" > "2.6.4" > "2.8.6" >

Re: [oe] [RFC] recipes/images/${distro}

2010-02-28 Thread Frans Meulenbroeks
2010/2/28 Koen Kooi : > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 27-02-10 22:27, Tom Rini wrote: >> On Sat, 2010-02-27 at 20:46 +, Phil Blundell wrote: >>> On Sat, 2010-02-27 at 16:56 +, Graeme Gregory wrote: NAK on creating extra levels. Changing the level wher

Re: [oe] [RFC} glib-2.0 cleanup

2010-02-28 Thread Frans Meulenbroeks
2010/2/28 Koen Kooi : > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > How do you know that some versions aren't used at all? Did you check all > external overlays? No. I have no access to them. But if someone decides to pin an old version in an external overlay, then I think it is their resp

Re: [oe] [RFC] recipes/images/${distro}

2010-02-28 Thread Koen Kooi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 27-02-10 22:27, Tom Rini wrote: > On Sat, 2010-02-27 at 20:46 +, Phil Blundell wrote: >> On Sat, 2010-02-27 at 16:56 +, Graeme Gregory wrote: >>> NAK on creating extra levels. >>> >>> Changing the level where recipes are held is not an optio

Re: [oe] [RFC] duplicate recipes

2010-02-28 Thread Koen Kooi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 See my response to your glib proposal On 28-02-10 21:01, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote: > Below is a list of all recipes that have 5 or more versions. > Guess a lot of these are deadwood. > Proposal is to do some cleaning for these. > > Probably the best

Re: [oe] [RFC} glib-2.0 cleanup

2010-02-28 Thread Koen Kooi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 How do you know that some versions aren't used at all? Did you check all external overlays? But more importantly, what harm do the recipes do to you? Does it offend you that there are 26 recipes? What are you trying to accomplish? If a recipe isn't

[oe] [RFC] duplicate recipes

2010-02-28 Thread Frans Meulenbroeks
Below is a list of all recipes that have 5 or more versions. Guess a lot of these are deadwood. Proposal is to do some cleaning for these. Probably the best scenario is to remove all versions which - are not the latest version - are not pinned with PREFERRED_VERSION in conf/distro/* - do not ha

Re: [oe] [PATCH] ezx: Use pulseaudio 0.9.15

2010-02-28 Thread Koen Kooi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 28-02-10 19:57, Antonio Ospite wrote: > Pulseaudio versions newer than 0.9.15 don't build on ezx machines (and > presumably on any armv5te), stick to this version until the problem is > handled upstream and a patch is available. > > Cfr: http://bug

[oe] [RFC} glib-2.0 cleanup

2010-02-28 Thread Frans Meulenbroeks
We have 26 glib-2.0 recipes (and 8 native ones). (see ls below) Only a few versions are used (see also the grep below) for glib-2.0: "2.12.12" "2.16.4" "2.18.3" "2.20.3" "2.22.1" "2.22.4" "2.6.4" "2.8.6" for glib-2.0-native: "2.16.1" "2.18.0" "2.22.1" "2.22.4" Both include the last two versions

[oe] [PATCH] ezx: Use pulseaudio 0.9.15

2010-02-28 Thread Antonio Ospite
Pulseaudio versions newer than 0.9.15 don't build on ezx machines (and presumably on any armv5te), stick to this version until the problem is handled upstream and a patch is available. Cfr: http://bugs.openembedded.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5404 Signed-off-by: Antonio Ospite --- conf/machine/include/

[oe] [RFC, PATCH] distros: prettier notation for dev snapshots version strings

2010-02-28 Thread Antonio Ospite
Make archives names look a little better. Compare the current: minimal-.dev-snapshot-20100216-i686-linux-armv5te-linux-gnueabi-toolchain.tar.bz2 to the proposed: minimal-dev.snapshot.20100216-i686-linux-armv5te-linux-gnueabi-toolchain.tar.bz2 The -. string in the current form could suggest t

[oe] [PATCH v2] meta-toolchain: Show build arch in archive name

2010-02-28 Thread Antonio Ospite
Show build arch in toolchain archive name so to easily recognize toolchains for the same targets but meant to be used on different build systems. Examples: minimal-.dev-snapshot-20100216-i686-linux-armv5te-linux-gnueabi-toolchain.tar.bz2 minimal-.dev-snapshot-20100216-x86_64-linux-armv5te-linu

[oe] uclibc: attr, acl, udev-151

2010-02-28 Thread Bernhard Guillon
Hi all, today I tried to get udev-151 to compile with uclibc for AVR32. I attached the resulting patches. For adding them to oe they are not enough tested and the udev patch is a really _ugly_ hack. It compiles with uclibc 0.9.30.2 (I needed to update angstroms config). The patches for attr and ac

Re: [oe] OpenEmbedded and known security issues

2010-02-28 Thread Holger Hans Peter Freyther
On Sunday 28 February 2010 15:22:26 Michael Lippautz wrote: > Could your provide a link to the current auditfile.tbz ? http://portaudit.FreeBSD.org/auditfile.tbz ___ Openembedded-devel mailing list Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org http://lis

Re: [oe] OpenEmbedded and known security issues

2010-02-28 Thread Michael Lippautz
Could your provide a link to the current auditfile.tbz ? ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/local-distfiles/eik/ is outdated? The webpage located at http://www.freebsd.org/ports/portaudit/ seems a lot more up to date (although it doesn't contain a link to an auditfile) Regards, Michael

Re: [oe] OpenEmbedded and known security issues

2010-02-28 Thread Holger Hans Peter Freyther
On Friday 26 February 2010 21:00:19 Holger Hans Peter Freyther wrote: > i try to merge that all with python and spit out a list of vulnerable > software in our tree... I will probably rewrite this with GNU smalltalk in the next days but here is the first version of a python script... It needs t

Re: [oe] [RFC] recipes/images/${distro}

2010-02-28 Thread Frans Meulenbroeks
2010/2/28 Tom Rini : > On Sun, 2010-02-28 at 03:34 +, Graeme Gregory wrote: >> On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 08:46:47PM +, Phil Blundell wrote: >> > On Sat, 2010-02-27 at 16:56 +, Graeme Gregory wrote: >> > > NAK on creating extra levels. >> > > >> > > Changing the level where recipes are hel