On Monday 29 March 2010 07:43:48 Danail wrote:
.
>
> | ./.lineno: fork: Cannot allocate memory
> | FATAL: oe_runconf failed
>
> NOTE: Task failed: /home/pc/stuff/build/tmp/work/x86_64-linux/
> quilt-native-0.46-r2/temp/log.do_configure.1750
> Any ideas what is the problem?
Hi,
this is a kind o
On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 06:55:51PM +0100, Koen Kooi wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 27-03-10 15:42, Martin Jansa wrote:
> > On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 12:32:15PM +0100, Koen Kooi wrote:
> >> I'm currently fixing outstanding bugs with our qt4 recipes so I can use
> >>
Hi All,
First post for me on this list, so I appologise if this is documented elsewhere.
I've been given the task of developing a proof of concept on the
dreambox. My hardware was shipped to me, arrived via courier, I built
the first image from your 1.6 tag (apologies if my terminology is
wrong,
Is openssl-native broken for anyone else, when built from scratch?
I think the conversion to new style staging was not complete/correct for the
-native part. Koen, can you please check it? Thanks.
--
Denys
___
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Openembe
Am Montag, 29. März 2010 11:12:28 schrieb Denys Dmytriyenko:
> Is openssl-native broken for anyone else, when built from scratch?
is broken for me too. failing in log.do_stage with
/bin/sh: line 6: /usr/share/man/man1/CA.pl.1ssl: Permission denied
>
> I think the conversion to new style staging
On Saturday 27 March 2010 19:31:49 GNUtoo wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-03-25 at 08:45 +0100, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote:
> > I've seen too often (also outside OE) that two engineers take the same
> > source yet still get different results, and that bugs at a customer
> > site cannot be reproduced in the lab
This patch adds support for the i.MX25 3Stack platform.
It is based on the patches released by Freescale as
part of LTIB.
---
conf/checksums.ini|8 +
conf/machine/mx25-3stack.conf | 25 +
recipes/linux/linux-mx25-3stack/defconfig |
Dnia poniedziałek, 29 marca 2010 o 14:15:30 Mickaël CHAZAUX napisał(a):
> This patch adds support for the i.MX25 3Stack platform.
> It is based on the patches released by Freescale as
> part of LTIB.
> +++ b/conf/checksums.ini
Move checksums into recipe which uses it please.
>
Hi,
> Do we have virtual/bootloader? First heard of it.
BB>> build virtual/bootloader
SHELL: Building virtual/bootloader
NOTE: multiple providers are available for virtual/bootloader
(u-boot-omap3beagleboard, u-boot-omap2430sdp, ezx-gen-blob, qi-ubi,
u-boot-openmoko, u-boot-omap3, u-boot, lowleve
> Using the third argument for this sort of thing is not ideal.. in fact, I've
> experimented with patching the autoconf macros to disable it.
I know,I sent the patch only for explaining better the issue,
I didn't plan at any moment to use that patch.
I just wanted an howto,in order to use the si
On Sun, 2010-03-28 at 15:48 +0200, Koen Kooi wrote:
> There are also a considerable amount of bitbake patches in there, could
> the bitbake hackers please take care of those?
Where?
http://patchwork.openembedded.org/project/openembedded/list/ ?
I can see one, am I missing something?
Cheers,
Ri
http://patchwork.openembedded.org/patch/1023/
http://patchwork.openembedded.org/patch/1074/
http://patchwork.openembedded.org/patch/1135/
http://patchwork.openembedded.org/patch/1334/
Is what I see on a quick scan.
Philip
On 03/29/2010 10:42 AM, Richard Purdie wrote:
On Sun, 2010-03-28 at 15:4
Hi, all!
How hard could be to generate -pg versions of packages in addition to -dbg ones?
And, also - if that is too far - how could I generate profiling
version of glibc,
which is most important for me now?
As I see, profiling is disabled with current version of libs with
--disable-profile,
but
On Fri, 26 Mar 2010 09:15:38 +0100
Antonio Ospite wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Mar 2010 01:06:05 +0100
> "Michael 'Mickey' Lauer" wrote:
>
> > > diff --git a/recipes/tasks/task-fso-compliance.bb
> > > b/recipes/tasks/task-fso-compliance.bb
> [...]
> > > @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@ RDEPENDS_${PN} = "\
> > > # f
=
OE weekly changelog for org.openembedded.dev, 2010-03-22 to 2010-03-29
Adrian Alonso (1):
u-boot_git.bb: add xilinx ml507 support
Antonio Ospite (9):
base.bbclass: add missing import of metadata_scm
ezx: update openezx-kernel version
e
Hi,
We currently build gcc and all its runtime libraries as part of at least
"gcc-cross", "gcc", "gcc-cross-sdk". Packaging of these libraries varies
between the different recipes and is a pretty scary place for things to
go wrong which I've frequently seen.
I'm working on the idea of having the
Release dated 2005 and the recipe in unmaintained, 1.3.4 recipe is alsmost
completely different now. So, I see no point in keeping it around.
Signed-off-by: Roman I Khimov
---
recipes/poptop/poptop_1.3.0.bb | 35 ---
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 35 deletion
Poptop tries to use that and we have it removed since it's broken, no good.
Signed-off-by: Roman I Khimov
---
recipes/poptop/poptop_1.3.4.bb |4 +++-
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/recipes/poptop/poptop_1.3.4.bb b/recipes/poptop/poptop_1.3.4.bb
index 370f6a3..
Signed-off-by: Roman I Khimov
---
recipes/poptop/poptop_1.3.4.bb |4 +++-
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/recipes/poptop/poptop_1.3.4.bb b/recipes/poptop/poptop_1.3.4.bb
index be1379a..8d9b60d 100644
--- a/recipes/poptop/poptop_1.3.4.bb
+++ b/recipes/poptop/popt
OE has ppp-2.4.3-mppe-mppc-1.1.patch for pppd and it disables
'require-mppe-128' option, so poptop complains:
In file /etc/ppp/options.pptpd: unrecognized option 'require-mppe-128'
on start. Fix that by using 'mppe' option.
Signed-off-by: Roman I Khimov
---
recipes/poptop/poptop_1.3.4.bb |
On (29/03/10 16:53), Richard Purdie wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We currently build gcc and all its runtime libraries as part of at least
> "gcc-cross", "gcc", "gcc-cross-sdk". Packaging of these libraries varies
> between the different recipes and is a pretty scary place for things to
> go wrong which I've f
From: Koen Kooi
---
recipes/gcc/gcc-configure-cross.inc | 13 +
recipes/gcc/gcc-package-cross.inc | 14 --
2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/recipes/gcc/gcc-configure-cross.inc
b/recipes/gcc/gcc-configure-cross.inc
index 1c37de8..7dde9
Hi All,
I am jumping across to this email list as the user one has very little
traffic.
I have just found OE and would like to use it to get Linux up and running on
some custom hardware. The hardware is currently running the logicloader
bootloader from LogicPD and a YAFFS2 filesystem.
I have fou
Hi Bernard,
I found this page during my searches for similar info:
http://wiki.openembedded.net/index.php/Adding_a_new_Machine
Don't know how useful or up to date it is though, I'm still new to
these parts and to OE in general, but I thought I'd post that here in
case it is useful.
regards,
Iza
Dear Izak,
Am Montag, den 29.03.2010, 11:04 +0200 schrieb Izak Burger:
> First post for me on this list, so I appologise if this is documented
> elsewhere.
Welcome!
[…]
> Without getting into the specifics and the ethics of clones, or the
> specifics of how I downgraded to bootloader and unbr
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 12:50 PM, Paul Menzel
wrote:
> Dear Izak,
>
>
> Am Montag, den 29.03.2010, 11:04 +0200 schrieb Izak Burger:
>> First post for me on this list, so I appologise if this is documented
>> elsewhere.
>
> Welcome!
>
> […]
>
>> Without getting into the specifics and the ethics of
On Mon, 2010-03-29 at 10:42 -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
> I have had gcc build all runtimes libraries separately. I think we should
> device gcc build and we can disable building certain directories via
> --disable-. We dont have to stash libgcc. Its not a big library and
> its probably better to rebuil
From: Klaus Kurzmann
Signed-off-by: Klaus Kurzmann
---
recipes/pkgconfig/pkgconfig.inc |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/recipes/pkgconfig/pkgconfig.inc b/recipes/pkgconfig/pkgconfig.inc
index 5707735..4f618f8 100644
--- a/recipes/pkgconfig/pkgconfig.inc
On 03/29/2010 05:53 PM, m...@mnet-online.de wrote:
From: Klaus Kurzmann
Signed-off-by: Klaus Kurzmann
Thanks. I just hit the same problem. I'll push as soon as my build finished.
Philip
---
recipes/pkgconfig/pkgconfig.inc |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff
Thanks, but doesn't help at all I think it requires a level of
understanding I don't have yet ...
Cheers,
Bernie
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 8:33 AM, Izak Burger wrote:
> Hi Bernard,
>
> I found this page during my searches for similar info:
>
> http://wiki.openembedded.net/index.php/Adding_a_
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 06:11:08PM -0400, Philip Balister wrote:
> On 03/29/2010 05:53 PM, m...@mnet-online.de wrote:
>> From: Klaus Kurzmann
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Klaus Kurzmann
>
> Thanks. I just hit the same problem. I'll push as soon as my build
> finished.
Same here. Thanks for fixing it.
--
* m4/openmp.m4 (AC_OPENMP): Do not define with Autoconf 2.62 or newer.
* 2008-12-03 Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Bruno Haible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* ref: http://www.mail-archive.com/bug-gnu...@gnu.org/msg12387.html
Signed-off-by: Adrian Alonso
---
recipes/imagemagick/image
Signed-off-by: Adrian Alonso
---
.../imagemagick/files/openm4-autoconf-fix.patch| 27
1 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 recipes/imagemagick/files/openm4-autoconf-fix.patch
diff --git a/recipes/imagemagick/files/openm4-autoconf-fix.pa
Hi,
I test imagemagick_6.3.5-10.bb and it fails
due that my host system of autoconf > 2.63
I search a bit and found a patch in gnulib mailing list [1] that skips
openm4 configuration when autoconf > 2.62, applying it resolves the failure
with imagemagic_6.3.5-10;
Patches should be at patchwork q
Dear OE folks,
$ bitbake --version
BitBake Build Tool Core version 1.8.19, bitbake version 1.8.19
For example if I do
$ bitbake -b /oe/recipes/libvalhalla/libvalhalla_hg.bb
`do_fetch` is then failing for me when `hg update`(?) is run.
Running the command again works th
35 matches
Mail list logo
