Re: [oe] [RFC][PATCH] meta-toolchain: use MULTIMACH_TARGET_SYS instead of TARGET_SYS

2010-04-23 Thread Tom Rini
On Fri, 2010-04-23 at 16:54 -0400, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: > On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 10:29:54PM +0200, Koen Kooi wrote: > > >> Yes, that needs to be done, as well as seperating the cross tools in > > >> case different archs need different versions (as is the case with > > >> angstrom, v5te and v7a

Re: [oe] [RFC][PATCH] meta-toolchain: use MULTIMACH_TARGET_SYS instead of TARGET_SYS

2010-04-23 Thread Denys Dmytriyenko
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 10:29:54PM +0200, Koen Kooi wrote: > >> Yes, that needs to be done, as well as seperating the cross tools in > >> case different archs need different versions (as is the case with > >> angstrom, v5te and v7a need different binutils). This change largely to > >> to cosmetical

Re: [oe] [RFC][PATCH] meta-toolchain: use MULTIMACH_TARGET_SYS instead of TARGET_SYS

2010-04-23 Thread Koen Kooi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 23-04-10 20:55, Tom Rini wrote: > On Fri, 2010-04-23 at 20:45 +0200, Koen Kooi wrote: >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> On 23-04-10 20:22, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: >>> On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 11:07:33AM -0700, Tom Rini wrote:

Re: [oe] gen-blob size with gcc-4.4.2 SOLVED? (was: [PATCH 0/5] Misc updates for EZX bits in OE)

2010-04-23 Thread Antonio Ospite
On Fri, 23 Apr 2010 09:45:04 -0700 Khem Raj wrote: > On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 5:28 AM, Antonio Ospite > wrote: [...] > > On Fri, 26 Mar 2010 16:17:24 +0100 > > Antonio Ospite wrote: > > > >> On Thu, 25 Mar 2010 13:39:00 -0700 > >> Khem Raj wrote: > >> > >> > On (25/03/10 18:19), Antonio Ospite

Re: [oe] [RFC][PATCH] meta-toolchain: use MULTIMACH_TARGET_SYS instead of TARGET_SYS

2010-04-23 Thread Tom Rini
On Fri, 2010-04-23 at 20:45 +0200, Koen Kooi wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 23-04-10 20:22, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 11:07:33AM -0700, Tom Rini wrote: > >> On Fri, 2010-04-23 at 13:07 +0200, Koen Kooi wrote: > > Ping > >>> > >>> It's bet

Re: [oe] [RFC][PATCH] meta-toolchain: use MULTIMACH_TARGET_SYS instead of TARGET_SYS

2010-04-23 Thread Koen Kooi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 23-04-10 20:22, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: > On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 11:07:33AM -0700, Tom Rini wrote: >> On Fri, 2010-04-23 at 13:07 +0200, Koen Kooi wrote: > Ping >>> >>> It's better than what we have today, true. And SDKPATH already contains >>> D

Re: [oe] [RFC][PATCH] meta-toolchain: use MULTIMACH_TARGET_SYS instead of TARGET_SYS

2010-04-23 Thread Denys Dmytriyenko
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 11:07:33AM -0700, Tom Rini wrote: > On Fri, 2010-04-23 at 13:07 +0200, Koen Kooi wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > Ping > > It's better than what we have today, true. And SDKPATH already contains > DISTRO, which is the likely changer of

Re: [oe] [RFC][PATCH] meta-toolchain: use MULTIMACH_TARGET_SYS instead of TARGET_SYS

2010-04-23 Thread Tom Rini
On Fri, 2010-04-23 at 13:07 +0200, Koen Kooi wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Ping It's better than what we have today, true. And SDKPATH already contains DISTRO, which is the likely changer of TOOLCHAIN_*_TASK. So... Acked-by: Tom Rini > > On 21-04-10 14:21, Koe

Re: [oe] gen-blob size with gcc-4.4.2 SOLVED? (was: [PATCH 0/5] Misc updates for EZX bits in OE)

2010-04-23 Thread Khem Raj
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 5:28 AM, Antonio Ospite wrote: > WARNING: > This was going to be a >  "I didn't know what I was doing but it worked" > kind of post, but then I did some homework and now I think I know a bit > more about what I did :) > > The post below is quite lengthy as it contains all t

[oe] Problem while booting from OE generated kernel

2010-04-23 Thread saleh usman
Hi I've built console-image for dm6446 and now I am having problem while booting kernel image after writint it to NAND flash.When I enter boot command in U-BOOT linux kernel stuck at uncompressing linux.Terminal log is show below I want to enable serial port to print debug messages,I've chec

Re: [oe] [Patch] locking in do_package_tar

2010-04-23 Thread Denys Dmytriyenko
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 12:04:44PM +0200, Jens Erdmann wrote: > Hey folks, > > I would like to introduce locking in do_package_tar. I had a case here were > do_package_tar and do_package_ipk where running parallel. Because of this > "tar: .: file changed as we read it" occurs. I fixed it by intro

Re: [oe] package installed_size field

2010-04-23 Thread Koen Kooi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 23-04-10 16:41, Jens Erdmann wrote: > Hi folks, > > I have a question in package creation. In my build process i create ipkg > packages and i don't understand, how the installed_size has to be > detected and where it will be set. My first idea were

[oe] package installed_size field

2010-04-23 Thread Jens Erdmann
Hi folks, I have a question in package creation. In my build process i create ipkg packages and i don't understand, how the installed_size has to be detected and where it will be set. My first idea were the package_ipkg.bbclass but it's missing there. How do you manage this? -- --- ROAD

Re: [oe] [PATCH] Add error handling to stage-manager

2010-04-23 Thread Dr. Michael Lauer
Am 23.04.2010 um 14:42 schrieb Mickaël Chazaux: > Add an error message telling the cause of the crash to the user. > --- > recipes/stage-manager/files/stage-manager | 14 +- > 1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/recipes/stage-manager/files/stage-m

[oe] [PATCH] Add error handling to stage-manager

2010-04-23 Thread Mickaël Chazaux
Add an error message telling the cause of the crash to the user. --- recipes/stage-manager/files/stage-manager | 14 +- 1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/recipes/stage-manager/files/stage-manager b/recipes/stage-manager/files/stage-manager index

[oe] populate_staging_postamble fails

2010-04-23 Thread Mickael Chazaux
Hi, I had this error a few times in file /home/mchazaux/projet/OE/angstrom-dev/work/telematic-board-angstrom-linux-gnueabi/linux-2.6.33-r70/temp/log.populate_staging_postamble.24667 : Traceback (most recent call last): File "/home/mchazaux/projet/OE/openembedded/recipes/stage-manager/files/st

Re: [oe] gen-blob size with gcc-4.4.2 SOLVED? (was: [PATCH 0/5] Misc updates for EZX bits in OE)

2010-04-23 Thread Antonio Ospite
WARNING: This was going to be a "I didn't know what I was doing but it worked" kind of post, but then I did some homework and now I think I know a bit more about what I did :) The post below is quite lengthy as it contains all the steps I went through in order to come to some conclusions. On Fr

Re: [oe] [RFC][PATCH] meta-toolchain: use MULTIMACH_TARGET_SYS instead of TARGET_SYS

2010-04-23 Thread Koen Kooi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Ping On 21-04-10 14:21, Koen Kooi wrote: > From: Koen Kooi > > This is the first step to be able to mix multiple arm archs (and ABIs) when > installing multiple SDKs on one buildhost (e.g. armv4 and armv7a). > > --- > recipes/meta/meta-toolchain.

[oe] [Patch] locking in do_package_tar

2010-04-23 Thread Jens Erdmann
Hey folks, I would like to introduce locking in do_package_tar. I had a case here were do_package_tar and do_package_ipk where running parallel. Because of this "tar: .: file changed as we read it" occurs. I fixed it by introduce locking in do_package_tar. What do you think about it? -- --