Re: [oe] opkg : angstrom fails console-image build

I've made a completely clean build last night and it breaks at the same problem. You have an 'opkg' package and an 'opkg-nogpg-nocurl' package. As far as I can tell, if you had built from a clean dev tree then there would be no 'opkg' package. Angstrom currently uses opkg-nogpg-nocurl, so that

Re: [oe] opkg : angstrom fails console-image build

On 22 July 2010 06:08, Marco Cavallini wrote: > Koen Kooi ha scritto, Il 21/07/2010 18:05: >> On 21-07-10 16:31, Marco Cavallini wrote: >>> Anybody could explain what's happening with opkg in OE recently please? >>> I saw a patch in ML and I wonder if it will be pushed in order to solve >>> this p

[oe] [PATCH] distro: Add new feature to indicate thumb-interworking.

* This would be used to decide if we can use BX in return instructions in uclibc. Signed-off-by: Khem Raj --- conf/distro/include/angstrom.inc |3 +++ conf/distro/include/kaeilos.inc |3 +++ conf/distro/include/slugos.inc |9 + conf/distro/minimal-uclibc.conf |1 +

Re: [oe] [PATCH 4/4] sanity.bbclass, abi_version.conf: Bump the ABI to inform that cross has died.

Khem Raj wrote: * tmpdir layout is changed bump ABI version to force a rebuild. Signed-off-by: Khem Raj Acked-by: Tom Rini --- classes/sanity.bbclass |2 ++ conf/abi_version.conf |2 +- 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/classes/sanity.bbclass b/classe

Re: [oe] [PATCH 2/4] toolchain: Remove references to CROSS_DIR

Khem Raj wrote: * Toolchain is installed into native sysroot now. Signed-off-by: Khem Raj Acked-by: Tom Rini --- recipes/binutils/binutils-cross.inc| 20 +- recipes/eglibc/eglibc-package.bbclass |4 +- recipes/gcc/gcc-configure-sdk.inc

Re: [oe] [PATCH 3/4] recipes: Fix references to CROSS_DIR

Khem Raj wrote: Signed-off-by: Khem Raj Acked-by: Tom Rini --- recipes/apex/apex-env_1.5.14.bb|6 +++--- recipes/apex/apex-env_1.5.8.bb |6 +++--- recipes/apex/apex-nslu2-16mb_1.5.14.bb |6 +++--- recipes/apex/apex-nslu2_1.5.14.bb

Re: [oe] [PATCH 1/4] classes, bitbake.conf: Remove CROSS_DIR, install cross-packages into native sysroot

Khem Raj wrote: * Update references to CROSS_DIR in classes and bitbake.conf. * This patch is based on Joshua Lock's work in poky. Signed-off-by: Khem Raj Acked-by: Tom Rini --- classes/cmake.bbclass|2 +- classes/cross.bbclass|8 classes/glibc-pac

Re: [oe] [PATCH 0/4][RFC] Remove CROSS_DIR, install cross-packages into native sysroot

Khem Raj wrote: Hi The following 4 patches are based on Jushua's work in poky to get rid of cross dir and install the toolchain in native sysroot. I have done native-sdk-builds for uclibc and eglibc. It could build the images and the images booted fine in qemu on mips and arm. I would appre

Re: [oe] opkg : angstrom fails console-image build

Koen Kooi ha scritto, Il 21/07/2010 18:05: > On 21-07-10 16:31, Marco Cavallini wrote: >> Anybody could explain what's happening with opkg in OE recently please? >> I saw a patch in ML and I wonder if it will be pushed in order to solve >> this problem. > >> http://pastebin.com/NhtAP0Re > > It l

[oe] [PATCH 2/4] toolchain: Remove references to CROSS_DIR

* Toolchain is installed into native sysroot now. Signed-off-by: Khem Raj --- recipes/binutils/binutils-cross.inc| 20 +- recipes/eglibc/eglibc-package.bbclass |4 +- recipes/gcc/gcc-configure-sdk.inc | 22 ++--

[oe] [PATCH 3/4] recipes: Fix references to CROSS_DIR

Signed-off-by: Khem Raj --- recipes/apex/apex-env_1.5.14.bb|6 +++--- recipes/apex/apex-env_1.5.8.bb |6 +++--- recipes/apex/apex-nslu2-16mb_1.5.14.bb |6 +++--- recipes/apex/apex-nslu2_1.5.14.bb |6 +++--- recipes/arm-kernel-sh

[oe] [PATCH 4/4] sanity.bbclass, abi_version.conf: Bump the ABI to inform that cross has died.

* tmpdir layout is changed bump ABI version to force a rebuild. Signed-off-by: Khem Raj --- classes/sanity.bbclass |2 ++ conf/abi_version.conf |2 +- 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/classes/sanity.bbclass b/classes/sanity.bbclass index 8eb7453..cff415a 10

[oe] [PATCH 0/4][RFC] Remove CROSS_DIR, install cross-packages into native sysroot

Hi The following 4 patches are based on Jushua's work in poky to get rid of cross dir and install the toolchain in native sysroot. I have done native-sdk-builds for uclibc and eglibc. It could build the images and the images booted fine in qemu on mips and arm. I would appreciate if someone c

[oe] [PATCH 1/4] classes, bitbake.conf: Remove CROSS_DIR, install cross-packages into native sysroot

* Update references to CROSS_DIR in classes and bitbake.conf. * This patch is based on Joshua Lock's work in poky. Signed-off-by: Khem Raj --- classes/cmake.bbclass|2 +- classes/cross.bbclass|8 classes/glibc-package.bbclass|8 classes/i

Re: [oe] legacy staging

2010/7/21 Frans Meulenbroeks > > > 2010/7/21 Koen Kooi > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> Hi, >> >> I built only a small sample of packages (angstrom-gnome-image and >> openjdk) and I get these 53 in legagy-staging.log: >> >> bcel/bcel_5.2.bb >> cacao/cacaoh-native_0.99.3

Re: [oe] opkg : angstrom fails console-image build

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 21-07-10 16:31, Marco Cavallini wrote: > Anybody could explain what's happening with opkg in OE recently please? > I saw a patch in ML and I wonder if it will be pushed in order to solve > this problem. > > http://pastebin.com/NhtAP0Re It looks l

[oe] [PATCH 2/2] cacaoh-openjdk-native: backported from openembedded-dev

From: Henning Heinold --- recipes/cacao/cacaoh-openjdk-native.inc | 31 + recipes/cacao/cacaoh-openjdk-native_0.99.4.bb |8 ++ 2 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) create mode 100644 recipes/cacao/cacaoh-openjdk-native.inc create mode 100644

[oe] [PATCH 0/2] updated two patches for second round of openjdk stable transition

From: Henning Heinold Hi agian, I made 2 mistakes in the patches. So here they are updated. Bye Henning Henning Heinold (2): icedtea6-native: backported from openembedded-dev cacaoh-openjdk-native: backported from openembedded-dev conf/checksums.ini | 12

[oe] opkg : angstrom fails console-image build

Anybody could explain what's happening with opkg in OE recently please? I saw a patch in ML and I wonder if it will be pushed in order to solve this problem. http://pastebin.com/NhtAP0Re BTW The same problem occurs with other compilation configurations. TIA /marco _

Re: [oe] Openjdk shark and cacao VMs not working - shark fixed

FYI: Tested on om-gta02 (armv4t) and only -zero seems to work (built from yesterday oe.dev, waiting for todays fixes to built). SHR r...@gojama ~ $ javac Linpack.java Warning: no leading - on line 43 of `/usr/lib/jvm/java-6-openjdk/jre/lib/arm/jvm.cfg' Warning: missing VM type on line 43 of `/u

[oe] [PATCH 00/21] second round of patches needed for openjdk for oe-stable

From: Henning Heinold Hi, sorry for the spam bu this is the second round of patches which are needed to get openjdk into openembedded-stable. Bye Henning Henning Heinold (21): ant: backport from openembedded-dev bcel: backport from openembedded-dev rhino: backpoprt from openembedded-dev

[oe] [PATCH 19/21] inetlib: backport from openembedded-dev

From: Henning Heinold * checksum are already in conf/checksums.ini --- recipes/classpath/files/toolwrapper-exithook.patch | 46 recipes/classpath/inetlib-1.1.1/datadir_java.patch | 23 ++ recipes/classpath/inetlib-native_1.1.1.bb |3 + recipes/classp

[oe] [PATCH 06/21] cup: backport from openembedded-dev

From: Henning Heinold * checksum is already in conf/checksums.ini --- recipes/cup/cup-native_0.10k.bb | 24 recipes/cup/cup_0.10k.bb| 39 +++ recipes/cup/files/cup |5 + 3 files changed, 68 insertions(+),

[oe] [PATCH 08/21] jakarta-commons: backport from openembedded-dev

From: Henning Heinold * checksums already in conf/checksums.ini --- recipes/jakarta-commons/commons-beanutils_1.8.0.bb | 10 +++ recipes/jakarta-commons/commons-cli_1.1.bb |7 ++ recipes/jakarta-commons/commons-codec_1.3.bb |7 ++ .../jakarta-commons/commons-collections3_

[oe] [PATCH 04/21] jacl: backport from openembedded-dev

From: Henning Heinold * checksum is already in conf/checksums.ini --- recipes/jacl/jacl-native_1.4.1.bb |4 recipes/jacl/jacl_1.4.1.bb| 20 2 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) create mode 100644 recipes/jacl/jacl-native_1.4.1.bb create mode

[oe] [PATCH 09/21] jakarta-libs: backport from openembedded-dev

From: Henning Heinold * checksums already in conf/checksums.ini --- .../avalon-framework-api-native_4.3.bb |4 +++ recipes/jakarta-libs/avalon-framework-api_4.3.bb | 28 recipes/jakarta-libs/bsf-native_2.4.0.bb |8 + recipes/jakarta-libs

[oe] [PATCH 17/21] giflib: provide native recipe

From: Henning Heinold --- recipes/giflib/giflib-native_4.1.6.bb |3 +++ 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) create mode 100644 recipes/giflib/giflib-native_4.1.6.bb diff --git a/recipes/giflib/giflib-native_4.1.6.bb b/recipes/giflib/giflib-native_4.1.6.bb new file mode 100644

[oe] [PATCH 16/21] fastjar: backport 0.98 version from openembedded-dev

From: Henning Heinold --- conf/checksums.ini |4 + recipes/fastjar/fastjar-native.inc | 18 + recipes/fastjar/fastjar-native_0.98.bb |4 + recipes/fastjar/fastjar.inc| 18 + recipes/fastjar/fastjar_0.98.bb|1 + recipes/fastjar/f

[oe] [PATCH 03/21] rhino: backpoprt from openembedded-dev

From: Henning Heinold * checksum is already in conf/checksums.ini --- recipes/mozilla/rhino-native_1.7r1.bb |5 recipes/mozilla/rhino/rhino |8 ++ recipes/mozilla/rhino/rhino-jsc |8 ++ recipes/mozilla/rhino_1.7r1.bb| 42

[oe] [PATCH 15/21] junit: backport from openembedded-dev

From: Henning Heinold * checksums already in conf/checksums.ini --- recipes/junit/junit-native_3.8.2.bb |4 recipes/junit/junit4-native_4.3.1.bb |4 recipes/junit/junit4_4.3.1.bb| 23 +++ recipes/junit/junit_3.8.2.bb | 34 +++

[oe] [PATCH 13/21] xalan-j: backport from openembedded-dev

From: Henning Heinold * checksum already in conf/checksums.ini --- recipes/xalan-j/xalan-j-native_2.7.1.bb | 14 +++ recipes/xalan-j/xalan-j_2.7.1.bb| 57 +++ 2 files changed, 71 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) create mode 100644 recipes/xalan-j/xalan-j

[oe] [PATCH 18/21] jamvm: backport version 1.5.3 from openembedded-dev

From: Henning Heinold * checksum is already in conf/checksums.ini --- recipes/jamvm/files/jamvm-1.5.3-jni_h-noinst.patch | 13 + recipes/jamvm/jamvm-native.inc | 10 +++--- recipes/jamvm/jamvm-native_1.5.3.bb|8 3 files changed

[oe] [PATCH 10/21] xml-commons: backport from openembedded-dev

From: Henning Heinold * checksums already in conf/checksums.ini --- recipes/xml-commons/jaxp1.3-native_1.3.04.bb |4 ++ recipes/xml-commons/jaxp1.3_1.3.04.bb | 24 + .../xml-commons-resolver1.1-native_1.2.bb |6 +++ recipes/xml-commons/xml-common

[oe] [PATCH 21/21] cacaoh-openjdk-native: backported from openembedded-dev

From: Henning Heinold --- recipes/cacao/cacaoh-openjdk-native.inc | 31 + recipes/cacao/cacaoh-openjdk-native_0.99.4.bb |8 ++ 2 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) create mode 100644 recipes/cacao/cacaoh-openjdk-native.inc create mode 100644

[oe] [PATCH 11/21] jcraft: backport from openembedded-dev

From: Henning Heinold * checksums already in conf/checksums.ini --- recipes/jcraft/jsch-native_0.1.40.bb |8 recipes/jcraft/jsch_0.1.40.bb| 21 + recipes/jcraft/jzlib-native_1.0.7.bb |6 ++ recipes/jcraft/jzlib_1.0.7.bb| 18 +++

[oe] [PATCH 05/21] jlex: backport from openembedded-stable

From: Henning Heinold * checksum is already in conf/checksums.ini --- recipes/jlex/files/jlex |5 recipes/jlex/jlex-native_1.2.6.bb | 23 + recipes/jlex/jlex_1.2.6.bb| 39 + 3 files changed, 67 insertions(+),

[oe] [PATCH 01/21] ant: backport from openembedded-dev

From: Henning Heinold --- conf/checksums.ini |4 ++ recipes/ant/ant-native_1.7.1.bb | 64 +++ recipes/ant/files/ant | 10 ++ 3 files changed, 78 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) create mode 100644 recipes/ant/ant-native_1.7.1.b

[oe] [PATCH 07/21] classpathx: backport from openembedded-dev

From: Henning Heinold * checksums alreasy in conf/checksums.ini --- recipes/classpathx/gnujaf-1.1.1/datadir_java.patch | 23 +++ recipes/classpathx/gnujaf-native_1.1.1.bb |3 + recipes/classpathx/gnujaf_1.1.1.bb | 35 .../classpathx/gnuma

[oe] [PATCH 02/21] bcel: backport from openembedded-dev

From: Henning Heinold * checksum already in conf/checksums.ini --- recipes/bcel/bcel-native_5.2.bb |6 ++ recipes/bcel/bcel_5.2.bb| 19 +++ 2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) create mode 100644 recipes/bcel/bcel-native_5.2.bb create mode 100644

[oe] [PATCH 14/21] jdepend: backport from openembedded-dev

From: Henning Heinold * checksum already in conf/checksums.ini --- recipes/jdepend/jdepend-native_2.9.bb |4 recipes/jdepend/jdepend_2.9.bb| 20 2 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) create mode 100644 recipes/jdepend/jdepend-native_2.9.bb cr

[oe] [PATCH 12/21] xerces-j: backport from openembedded-dev

From: Henning Heinold * checksum already in conf/checksums.ini --- recipes/xerces-j/xerces-j-native_2.9.1.bb |8 + recipes/xerces-j/xerces-j_2.9.1.bb| 45 + 2 files changed, 53 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) create mode 100644 recipes/xerces-j/xerces

Re: [oe] legacy staging

2010/7/21 Koen Kooi > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hi, > > I built only a small sample of packages (angstrom-gnome-image and > openjdk) and I get these 53 in legagy-staging.log: > > bcel/bcel_5.2.bb > cacao/cacaoh-native_0.99.3.bb > classpath/classpath-tools-native.bb > cla

Re: [oe] Openjdk shark and cacao VMs not working - shark fixed

Hi Koen! I have updated the llvm2.7 package to fix the shark UNREACHABLE executed at ARMCodeEmitter.cpp:554! error http://cgit.openembedded.org/cgit.cgi/openembedded/commit/?id=d1dcd08e4ec0b65aaaef149bace47da16acf7626 By using those fixes i was able to pass your Linpack testcase: xer...@overo:/u

[oe] legacy staging

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I built only a small sample of packages (angstrom-gnome-image and openjdk) and I get these 53 in legagy-staging.log: bcel/bcel_5.2.bb cacao/cacaoh-native_0.99.3.bb classpath/classpath-tools-native.bb classpath/classpath_0.98.bb cup/cup_0.10k.bb d

Re: [oe] angstrom-2008.1, uclibc: git-native: sysroot-destdir 6, 4 GB big, since some executables are 100 MB each

Am Dienstag, den 20.07.2010, 15:44 -0700 schrieb Khem Raj: > On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 2:14 PM, Paul Menzel > wrote: > > Am Sonntag, den 18.07.2010, 16:48 +0200 schrieb Paul Menzel: > >> Am Samstag, den 17.07.2010, 14:15 +0200 schrieb Koen Kooi: > >> > On 17-07-10 10:35, Paul Menzel wrote: > >> > >

Re: [oe] [PATCH 1/2] libgpsbt_0.1: adding dbus-glib to DEPENDS

On Tue, 13 Jul 2010 16:08:56 +0200 Nicola Ranaldo wrote: > --- > recipes/maemo4/libgpsbt_0.1.bb |2 +- > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > Ah I just realized these patches miss the proper Signed-off-by line, Nicola, what address should I use for that? Maybe you are willing

Re: [oe] Openjdk shark and cacao VMs not working

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 19-07-10 11:37, Koen Kooi wrote: > Hi, > > I built openjdk completely from scratch and installed it: > > opkg install openjdk-6-common openjdk-6-demo openjdk-6-java > openjdk-6-jdk openjdk-6-jre > > opkg install openjdk-6-vm-shark openjdk-6-vm-cacao

Re: [oe] [jalimo-info] problems with latest openjdk - fixed

Hi Pete I have back-ported fixes to the oe.dev llvm2.7 from the upstream llvm2.8svn branch to fix the "ARMCodeEmitter::emitPseudoInstruction UNREACHABLE executed at /OE/angstrom-dev/work/armv7a-angstrom-linux-gnueabi/llvm2.7-2.7-r6/llvm-2.7/lib/Target/ARM/ARMCodeEmitter.cpp:554!" that you have be

Re: [oe] [RFC][PATCH] distro: Move thumb into distro features

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 20-07-10 07:08, Khem Raj wrote: > On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 3:46 PM, Khem Raj wrote: >> On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 1:18 AM, Khem Raj wrote: >>> * Currenlty we define the thumb specific overrides in machine tune files >>> and as machine conf files are

Re: [oe] [RFC][PATCH] distro: Move thumb into distro features

On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 10:08:02PM -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 3:46 PM, Khem Raj wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 1:18 AM, Khem Raj wrote: > >> * Currenlty we define the thumb specific overrides in machine tune files > >>  and as machine conf files are included before the d

Re: [oe] [RFC] New stable branch (and maybe a new process?)

2010/7/21 Esben Haabendal > On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 9:22 PM, Stefan Schmidt > wrote: > > > What does not fit your needs with the current stable handling? > > It started out with a rather continous flow of changed from dev, > causing it to be almost as unstable as dev. Now stable/2009 looks > mos