here is updated patch
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 10:46 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 7:32 PM, Russell Morris
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>>
>> A bit more info to try and help out here - as I'm fighting with this as best
>> I can, but it's still kicking my butt ... :-).
>>
>>
>>
>> It re
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 7:32 PM, Russell Morris wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> A bit more info to try and help out here - as I'm fighting with this as best
> I can, but it's still kicking my butt ... :-).
>
>
>
> It really does look like the executable that is being created is not build
> for the arm920t (
Hi,
A bit more info to try and help out here - as I'm fighting with this as best I
can, but it's still kicking my butt ... :-).
It really does look like the executable that is being created is not build for
the arm920t (armv4t). I have tried to run the executable on the target, and
also
On Wed, 2011-01-05 at 00:40 +0300, Yury Bushmelev wrote:
> 2011/1/1 Richard Purdie :
> > I've been looking at the changes in bitbake master and those in Poky.
> > Both are trying to improve the logging situation but I think we need to
> > discuss/agree what we're trying to achieve.
>
> [skip]
>
>
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 4:17 PM, Richard Purdie wrote:
> I'm also going to look at getting back the XMLRPC interfaces and
> abstraction that the removal of triggered this discussion. There does
> appear to be some differences in opinion on the future of bitbake from
> the server/UI perspective and
On Tue, 2011-01-04 at 15:00 -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 13:39, Richard Purdie wrote:
> ...
> > This kind of response from you is frustrating. Trying to ask any
> > question results in a response like this and I don't think its
> > productive or helpful.
>
> Can we try t
2011/1/1 Richard Purdie :
> I've been looking at the changes in bitbake master and those in Poky.
> Both are trying to improve the logging situation but I think we need to
> discuss/agree what we're trying to achieve.
[skip]
> Thoughts/Comments/Suggestions?
I'm interested in build perfomance mon
With february and fosdem approaching I have created
http://wiki.openembedded.org/index.php/Fosdem_2011
Feel free to add yourself if you are attending.
ka6sox will update (or probably already has updated) the latest news section.
We might also mention our Cebit booth there, but I do not have the
* Remove am-benchmarks_svn.bb now that the recipe name inlucdes the PV.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Lance
---
recipes/ti/am-benchmarks_svn.bb | 37 -
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)
delete mode 100644 recipes/ti/am-benchmarks_svn.bb
diff --git
2010/12/31 Paul Menzel :
> Date: Fri, 31 Dec 2010 10:43:44 +0100
>
> [1] http://daringfireball.net/projects/markdown/
What is this? :)
> Signed-off-by: Paul Menzel
> CC: Yuri Bushmelev
> ---
> I am no native English speaker, so some corrections are probably incorrect.
As non-native speaker as
Hi,
I'm in the process of upgrading the sheevaplug kernel to 2.6.36. I
noticed the current version of 2.6.36 is at patch 1 but 2.6.36.2 is
already out.
Guess this needs some coordination with the other users. Currently the
recipe says:
DEFAULT_PREFERENCE = "-1"
DEFAULT_PREFERENCE_mx31ads = "1"
DE
On 04.01.2011 16:16, Steffen Sledz wrote:
I can try to add the ConfirmEdit[1] mediawiki extension for this purpose.
ConfirmEdits default math question is looking too simple. reCAPTCHA
might be better? Recent anti reCHAPCHA tools having rates about 17%. It
is also solvable for blind people.
* Modify recipe name to include package version
* add support for additional platforms am181x-evm and am180x-evm
* Update the SRCREV
* Fix pathname to Rules.make in each Makefile
Signed-off-by: Jeff Lance
---
Updated in version 2:
* Removed PV since it is now in the filename
* Remov
For the ti-pru-sw-examples, ti-pru-sw-app-loader, ti-pru-sw-edma-driver,
ti-pru-sw-edma-library:
* Update SRC_REV
Signed-off-by: Melissa Watkins
---
In version 2:
* Removed bumping PR
---
recipes/ti/ti-pru-sw-app-loader_1.00.00.bb |2 +-
recipes/ti/ti-pru-sw-edma-driver_1.00.00.bb |
> -Original Message-
> From: openembedded-devel-boun...@lists.openembedded.org
> [mailto:openembedded-devel-boun...@lists.openembedded.org] On Behalf Of
> Jeff Lance
> Sent: Tuesday, January 04, 2011 12:57 PM
> To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
> Cc: Lance, Jeff
> Subject: [oe]
* adding am180x, am181x, da850-omapl138, am3517 and am3715 support
* Updating SRC rev to pull in matrix-tui project with platform support
* removing INSANE_SKIP, it originally handled pre-built binaries which
have since been removed
* Creating version 1.1 of the recipe
* matrix-tui.inc with platf
2011/1/4 Philip Balister :
> On 01/04/2011 01:15 PM, AJ ONeal wrote:
>>
>> I'm pro captcha.
>
> Since we are having a poll, I am for anything that helps out the guys doing
> admin work :)
>
>
I fully agree!
but if there are alternatives that are as effective as the captcha,
I'm in favour of those.
* Modify recipe name to include package version
* add support for additional platforms am181x-evm and am180x-evm
* Update the SRCREV
* Fix pathname to Rules.make in each Makefile
Signed-off-by: Jeff Lance
---
.../{am-benchmarks_svn.bb => am-benchmarks_1.2.bb} |8 +---
1 files c
On 01/04/2011 01:15 PM, AJ ONeal wrote:
I'm pro captcha.
Since we are having a poll, I am for anything that helps out the guys
doing admin work :)
Philip
AJ ONeal
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 8:16 AM, Steffen Sledz wrote:
Am 23.12.2010 23:14, schrieb Khem Raj:
...
It looks like someone is
I'm pro captcha.
AJ ONeal
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 8:16 AM, Steffen Sledz wrote:
> Am 23.12.2010 23:14, schrieb Khem Raj:
> >> ...
> >> It looks like someone is spamming our wiki with new users :-(
> >>
> >> Any ideas where to go from here?
> >
> > Add a captcha when creating new user acct
>
> I
On Tue, 2011-01-04 at 08:30 -0700, Chris Larson wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 1, 2011 at 11:14 AM, Richard Purdie
> wrote:
> > I've been looking at the changes in bitbake master and those in Poky.
> > Both are trying to improve the logging situation but I think we need to
> > discuss/agree what we're tryin
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 13:39, Richard Purdie wrote:
...
> This kind of response from you is frustrating. Trying to ask any
> question results in a response like this and I don't think its
> productive or helpful.
Can we try to get something done instead of this useless type of discussion?
--
Ot
On Tue, 2011-01-04 at 07:56 -0700, Chris Larson wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 1, 2011 at 12:49 PM, Richard Purdie
> wrote:
> > The split between the code in general in bitbake is in general ever
> > improving in my opinion. Chris has some some really great work on
> > bitbake recently, particularly making
On Sat, Jan 1, 2011 at 11:14 AM, Richard Purdie
wrote:
> I've been looking at the changes in bitbake master and those in Poky.
> Both are trying to improve the logging situation but I think we need to
> discuss/agree what we're trying to achieve.
>
> I'm trying to think about this from the user po
Am 23.12.2010 23:14, schrieb Khem Raj:
>> ...
>> It looks like someone is spamming our wiki with new users :-(
>>
>> Any ideas where to go from here?
>
> Add a captcha when creating new user acct
I can try to add the ConfirmEdit[1] mediawiki extension for this purpose.
Would a captcha be accepte
On Sat, Jan 1, 2011 at 12:49 PM, Richard Purdie
wrote:
> The split between the code in general in bitbake is in general ever
> improving in my opinion. Chris has some some really great work on
> bitbake recently, particularly making it more pythonic. Some of the
> changes just before the holidays,
Thanks for this patch, have applied modified to apply for avr32 only as
that platform cannot move toolchains.
Graeme
On 26/11/2010 23:22, bernhard.guil...@opensimpad.org wrote:
> From: Bernhard Guillon
>
>
> Signed-off-by: Bernhard Guillon
> ---
> recipes/vlc/x264-r2245/uclibc_log2f_fix.HACK
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03-01-11 22:00, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As ipkg-utils doesn't download for me anymore i was wondering
> about the status of packaged-staging and how to use it (must be
> documented somewhere, i must be blind or something as i can'
I agree for the test statement, but that may be solved by using ´the
brackets in the long statement.
Otavio Salvador schrieb:
> On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 09:58, Wolfgang Hauser wrote:
>> Keep it simple and stupid!
>> So I vote for the long, readable and less error prone version.
>
> I usually prefe
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 09:58, Wolfgang Hauser wrote:
> Keep it simple and stupid!
> So I vote for the long, readable and less error prone version.
I usually prefer the KISS however on this specific case I disagree.
The new code avoid using test and a fork. This allows for "test"
applet removal i
Keep it simple and stupid!
So I vote for the long, readable and less error prone version.
Regards
Wolfgang Hauser
Roman I Khimov schrieb:
> В сообщении от Понедельник 03 января 2011 23:02:03 автор Bernhard Reutner-
> Fischer написал:
>> -if test "x$D" != "x"; then
>> -OPT="-r $D"
>> -else
>>
To support compat-wireless-2.6-old for the palmpre machine we need several
patches to let
it build with the modified 2.6.24 based kernel.
Signed-off-by: Simon Busch
---
...ig-disable-all-but-libertas-and-ieee80211.patch | 320
.../palmpre/ignore-compat-devname.patch
compat-wireless-2.6-old provides more recent wireless drivers than kernels <=
2.6.26
provides on their own. On some machines you are stucked to that quite old
kernel version
but need a more recent wireless driver to get wifi working.
Signed-off-by: Simon Busch
---
.../compat-wireless-2.6-old/f
Heyho,
for the palmpre machine we currently need the libertas driver from the very old
compat-wireless-2.6-old. The first patch adds a recipe to build
compat-wireless-2.6-old
and the second patch adjusts it for the palmpre machine. As
compat-wireless-2.6-old is old
and no longer maintained it wi
Am 18.11.2010 23:13, schrieb Cliff Brake:
> Last week's test run was a success with 38 combinations passing.
> Thanks to all running tests:
>
> http://cgit.openembedded.org/cgit.cgi/openembedded/tag/?id=tested_2010-11-12
Just a short question (i was "offline" for some weeks).
The Testing Log [1]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04-01-11 05:39, Mike Westerhof wrote:
> On 1/3/2011 1:49 AM, Koen Kooi wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> On 03-01-11 02:03, Mike Westerhof wrote:
>>> On 1/2/2011 11:41 AM, Koen Kooi wrote:
>>> On 02-01-11 16:15, Mike W
36 matches
Mail list logo
