Re: [oe] testing branch 2011-02-03

2011-02-07 Thread Steffen Sledz
Am 04.02.2011 19:07, schrieb Khem Raj: > On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 7:21 AM, Steffen Sledz wrote: >> On 02/04/2011 02:08 PM, Cliff Brake wrote: >>> master has been merged to testing-next and is ready for clean builds. >> >> My first try with the new branch and minimal-image failed configuring >> libt

[oe] [PATCH] cortex-m3: adjusted target cflags

2011-02-07 Thread Enrico Scholz
Explicit '-mthumb' is required because Cortex-M3 does not support ARM instructions and actual flags cause gcc to fail with 'error: target CPU does not support ARM mode'. The '-mcpu=cortex-m3' is shorter than '-march=armv7-m -mtune=cortex-m3' and enables workarounds like '-mfix-cortex-m3-ldrd'. Si

[oe] [PATCH] gcc-4.5: added thumb2 build patch

2011-02-07 Thread Enrico Scholz
Fix for http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43999 and is required to build gcc for Thumb2 only architectures (e.g. Cortex-M3). Signed-off-by: Enrico Scholz --- recipes/gcc/gcc-4.5.inc|3 ++- recipes/gcc/gcc-4.5/thumb2-build.patch | 11 +++ 2 files changed, 1

Re: [oe] OE 2011.03 release vs. oe-core migration

2011-02-07 Thread Stefan Schmidt
Hello. On Wed, 2011-01-26 at 07:55, Tom Rini wrote: > On 01/26/2011 03:44 AM, Graeme Gregory wrote: > >On 26/01/2011 10:23, Stefan Schmidt wrote: > >> > >>During last OEDEM we set out a timeline for quarterly releases. The first > >>one > >>hit on time in december 2010 (Thanks Khem). > >> > >>The

Re: [oe] [PATCH] gcc-4.5: added thumb2 build patch

2011-02-07 Thread Koen Kooi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 07-02-11 16:53, Enrico Scholz wrote: > Fix for http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43999 and is > required to build gcc for Thumb2 only architectures (e.g. Cortex-M3). > > Signed-off-by: Enrico Scholz > --- > recipes/gcc/gcc-4.5.inc

[oe] OE weekly changelog for org.openembedded.dev, 2011-01-31 to 2011-02-07

2011-02-07 Thread Cliff Brake
= OE weekly changelog for org.openembedded.dev, 2011-01-31 to 2011-02-07 Andrea Adami (3): linux-kexecboot: move SRCREV of git recipe to 2.6.38-rc3 linux-kexecboot: refresh Zaurus defconfigs for new SRCREV (2.6.38-rc3) kexecboot: add --enab

[oe] [PATCH, v2] gcc-4.5: added thumb2 build patch

2011-02-07 Thread Enrico Scholz
Fix for http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43999 and is required to build gcc for Thumb2 only architectures (e.g. Cortex-M3). Signed-off-by: Enrico Scholz --- recipes/gcc/gcc-4.5.inc|3 ++- recipes/gcc/gcc-4.5/thumb2-build.patch | 16 2 files chang

Re: [oe] [PATCH, v2] gcc-4.5: added thumb2 build patch

2011-02-07 Thread Khem Raj
On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 9:25 AM, Enrico Scholz wrote: > Fix for http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43999 and is > required to build gcc for Thumb2 only architectures (e.g. Cortex-M3). > > Signed-off-by: Enrico Scholz > --- >  recipes/gcc/gcc-4.5.inc                |    3 ++- >  recipes/gc

Re: [oe] [PATCH] cortex-m3: adjusted target cflags

2011-02-07 Thread Khem Raj
On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 7:53 AM, Enrico Scholz wrote: > Explicit '-mthumb' is required because Cortex-M3 does not support ARM > instructions and actual flags cause gcc to fail with 'error: target CPU > does not support ARM mode'. > > The '-mcpu=cortex-m3' is shorter than '-march=armv7-m -mtune=cort

Re: [oe] OE 2011.03 release vs. oe-core migration

2011-02-07 Thread Khem Raj
On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 8:08 AM, Stefan Schmidt wrote: > Hello. > > On Wed, 2011-01-26 at 07:55, Tom Rini wrote: >> On 01/26/2011 03:44 AM, Graeme Gregory wrote: >> >On 26/01/2011 10:23, Stefan Schmidt wrote: >> >> >> >>During last OEDEM we set out a timeline for quarterly releases. The first >> >

Re: [oe] [PATCH] cortex-m3: adjusted target cflags

2011-02-07 Thread Mark Hatle
On 2/7/11 1:33 PM, Khem Raj wrote: > On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 7:53 AM, Enrico Scholz > wrote: >> Explicit '-mthumb' is required because Cortex-M3 does not support ARM >> instructions and actual flags cause gcc to fail with 'error: target CPU >> does not support ARM mode'. >> >> The '-mcpu=cortex-m3'

Re: [oe] OE 2011.03 release vs. oe-core migration

2011-02-07 Thread Tom Rini
On 02/07/2011 12:36 PM, Khem Raj wrote: On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 8:08 AM, Stefan Schmidt wrote: Hello. On Wed, 2011-01-26 at 07:55, Tom Rini wrote: On 01/26/2011 03:44 AM, Graeme Gregory wrote: On 26/01/2011 10:23, Stefan Schmidt wrote: During last OEDEM we set out a timeline for quarterly

Re: [oe] [PATCH] cortex-m3: adjusted target cflags

2011-02-07 Thread Khem Raj
On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 11:39 AM, Mark Hatle wrote: > On 2/7/11 1:33 PM, Khem Raj wrote: >> On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 7:53 AM, Enrico Scholz >> wrote: >>> Explicit '-mthumb' is required because Cortex-M3 does not support ARM >>> instructions and actual flags cause gcc to fail with 'error: target CPU

Re: [oe] [PATCH] cortex-m3: adjusted target cflags

2011-02-07 Thread Mark Hatle
On 2/7/11 2:19 PM, Khem Raj wrote: > On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 11:39 AM, Mark Hatle wrote: >> On 2/7/11 1:33 PM, Khem Raj wrote: >>> On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 7:53 AM, Enrico Scholz >>> wrote: Explicit '-mthumb' is required because Cortex-M3 does not support ARM instructions and actual flags

Re: [oe] [PATCH] cortex-m3: adjusted target cflags

2011-02-07 Thread Enrico Scholz
Khem Raj writes: >> The '-mcpu=cortex-m3' is shorter than '-march=armv7-m -mtune=cortex-m3' >> and enables workarounds like '-mfix-cortex-m3-ldrd'. > > Does -mcpu=cortex-m3 also cause gcc to tune for cortex-m3 ? Yes; logic in gcc/config/arm/arm.c is: |if (i == ARM_OPT_SET_CPU || i == ARM_OP

Re: [oe] [PATCH] clutter: fix broken clutter-gtk

2011-02-07 Thread Andreas Mueller
On Thursday 03 February 2011 22:46:56 Henning Heinold wrote: > hm maybee its better to concentrate on clutter 1.6 release. Just played with clutter 1.6.2 (released today) and got: | checking for GLIB - version >= 2.26.0... no | *** Could not run GLIB test program, checking why... | *** The test p

Re: [oe] [PATCH] cortex-m3: adjusted target cflags

2011-02-07 Thread Khem Raj
On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 12:59 PM, Enrico Scholz wrote: > Khem Raj writes: > >>> The '-mcpu=cortex-m3' is shorter than '-march=armv7-m -mtune=cortex-m3' >>> and enables workarounds like '-mfix-cortex-m3-ldrd'. >> >> Does -mcpu=cortex-m3 also cause gcc to tune for cortex-m3 ? > > Yes; logic in gcc/c

[oe] [PATCH] task-base: conditional wifi and bluetooth tasks in PACKAGES

2011-02-07 Thread Filip Zyzniewski
This reduces amount of tasks for bootstrap-image from around 3400 to around 1600 for jlime. Signed-off-by: Filip Zyzniewski --- recipes/tasks/task-base.bb |6 +++--- 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/recipes/tasks/task-base.bb b/recipes/tasks/task-base.bb index 3

Re: [oe] [PATCH] cortex-m3: adjusted target cflags

2011-02-07 Thread Enrico Scholz
Khem Raj writes: > Can you check what does gcc emits in an assembly file when using > -mcpu=cortex-m3 in your case. If it emits sdiv instruction or not > > int foo (long a, long b) > { > return a/b; > } $ arm-linux-uclibceabi-gcc -mthumb -mcpu=cortex-m3 -mfpu=vfp -mfloat-abi=softfp -O1

Re: [oe] [PATCH] cortex-m3: adjusted target cflags

2011-02-07 Thread Khem Raj
On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 2:27 PM, Enrico Scholz wrote: > Khem Raj writes: > >> Can you check what does gcc emits in an assembly file when using >> -mcpu=cortex-m3 in your case. If it emits sdiv instruction or not >> >> int foo (long a, long b) >> { >>         return a/b; >> } > > $ arm-linux-uclibc

[oe] angstrom-2010.x: eglibc-2.12-r21.8+svnr12323: `/tmp/ccqyEDnv.s:33181: Error: can't resolve `.LBB491' {*UND* section} - `.Ltext0' {.text section}`

2011-02-07 Thread Paul Menzel
Dear OE folks, task `compile` with 82c07ebb and `angstrom-2010.x` for `MACHINE = "beagleboard"` fails with the following error. In file included from dl-init.c:21:0: ../ports/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/arm/ldsodefs.h:41:0: warning: "MORE_ELF_HEADER_DATA" redefined ../sysdep