Re: [oe] firefox fails at xpidl: missing glib

On 11-04-08 02:22 PM, Neil MacMunn wrote: On 11-04-08 11:23 AM, Neil MacMunn wrote: I'm trying to bitbake firefox with this configuration. Build Configuration: BB_VERSION = "1.12.0" METADATA_BRANCH = "unstable" METADATA_REVISION = "219f1e9" TARGET_ARCH = "arm" TARGET_OS = "linux-gnueabi" MACHI

Re: [oe] python-distutils_2.6.6: config/Makefile contains sysroot

On Sat, Apr 9, 2011 at 10:40 PM, Khem Raj wrote: > you should try to figure out why binutils was build without sysroot. Check > the configure args for binutils-cross I guess there was some misunderstanding, the problem is that the Makefile on the target contains references to the sysroot on the h

Re: [oe] Upstreaming patches

On 12 April 2011 09:16, Philip Balister wrote: > Saul Wold asked me about upstreaming some of the patches in OE. Apparently, > Intel has some people who can look at submitting some of our patches > upstream. > > The question is, what do we do about attribution? The problem is that is not > simple

[oe] Upstreaming patches

Saul Wold asked me about upstreaming some of the patches in OE. Apparently, Intel has some people who can look at submitting some of our patches upstream. The question is, what do we do about attribution? The problem is that is not simple for many cases working out who created the patch. Rathe

Re: [oe] [PATCH 4/6] xserver-xorg (1.9.4): enable xephyr

On (11/04/11 15:10), Martin Jansa wrote: > | 'ephyrGetStill': > | ephyrvideo.c:1243:1: internal compiler error: in > default_secondary_reload, at targhooks.c:762 > | Please submit a full bug report, > | with preprocessed source if appropriate. > | See for instruction

Re: [oe] ncurses-5.7 patch files are missing

> -Original Message- > From: openembedded-devel-boun...@lists.openembedded.org > [mailto:openembedded-devel-boun...@lists.openembedded.org] On Behalf Of > Tom Rini > Sent: Monday, April 11, 2011 3:21 PM > To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org > Subject: Re: [oe] ncurses-5.7 patch f

Re: [oe] ncurses-5.7 patch files are missing

On 04/11/2011 01:17 PM, Maupin, Chase wrote: >> -Original Message- >> From: openembedded-devel-boun...@lists.openembedded.org >> [mailto:openembedded-devel-boun...@lists.openembedded.org] On Behalf Of >> Henning Heinold >> Sent: Monday, April 11, 2011 3:12 PM >> To: openembedded-devel@lists

Re: [oe] ncurses-5.7 patch files are missing

> -Original Message- > From: openembedded-devel-boun...@lists.openembedded.org > [mailto:openembedded-devel-boun...@lists.openembedded.org] On Behalf Of > Henning Heinold > Sent: Monday, April 11, 2011 3:12 PM > To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org > Subject: Re: [oe] ncurses-5.7 p

Re: [oe] ncurses-5.7 patch files are missing

On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 03:07:35PM -0500, Maupin, Chase wrote: > All, > > Has anyone else noticed that the patch files referred to in the ncurses_5.7 > recipe are missing from the ftp site? The patch files are: > > ncurses-5.7-20110108-patch.sh.bz2 > ncurses-5.7-20110115.patch.gz > > Does anyo

[oe] ncurses-5.7 patch files are missing

All, Has anyone else noticed that the patch files referred to in the ncurses_5.7 recipe are missing from the ftp site? The patch files are: ncurses-5.7-20110108-patch.sh.bz2 ncurses-5.7-20110115.patch.gz Does anyone have these mirrored or can they be uploaded to a mirror like the Angstrom mir

Re: [oe] [PATCH v2] lowpan-tools_0.2.2; : fix build with static libnl1

Hi, A third version has just been posted. * Stefan Schmidt [110411 13:41]: > On Mon, 2011-04-11 at 13:29, Anders Darander wrote: > > Yes, I agree with you that the correct fix is to update lowpan-tools > > to use libnl2. However, due to time constraints, we opted for the > > interim solution.

[oe] [PATCHv3] lowpan-tools_0.2.2;: fix build with static libnl1

* add NL_CFLAGS to a few Makefiles.am (to find libnl header files) * add _GNU_SOURCE to a few Makefiles.am (to make struct ucread visible) * git version not fixed * build and runtime tested, although only in qemuarm Signed-off-by: Anders Darander --- v3: * Removed the PR bump in lowpan-tools_0.2

Re: [oe] [2011.03-maintenance] cherry-pick request

On 04/10/2011 02:43 AM, Eric Bénard wrote: > Hi Tom, > > is it possible to cherry-pick the following commits to 2011.03-maintenance. > They are part of your fixes for patches with ".." in path but only the > ones for tcl/tk were merged into 2011.03-maintenance branch, thus for > example db5 fails

Re: [oe] [mpc5125-twr 1/2] New machine mpc5125-twr, Freescale TWR-MPC5125-KIT

on 08.04.2011 23:37 Tom Rini said the following: > On 04/08/2011 01:02 PM, Jan Kobler wrote: >> 2. I have tried to provide the same for Openembedded as Freescale is >> currently shipping on their web page >> http://www.freescale.com/webapp/sps/site/prod_summary.jsp?code=TWR-MPC5125-KIT&fpsp=1&tab=D

Re: [oe] [PATCH 4/6] xserver-xorg (1.9.4): enable xephyr

On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 10:10, Martin Jansa wrote: > are you using sane-toolchain with gcc-4.5? Yes; using mininal distro. -- Otavio Salvador                             O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br  http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854              http://projet

Re: [oe] [PATCH 1/5] xorg: add new versions

On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 1:44 PM, Martin Jansa wrote: > * xserver-xorg-1.10, dolt was removed in upstream > a769f4c22a9cfb5ba248c924a66c31ec966bd8a0 > * xserver-xorg-1.10, randr-support needs to be updated, but maybe won't >  be needed when new xinput-calibrator with config in xorg.conf.d is >  use

Re: [oe] [PATCH 4/6] xserver-xorg (1.9.4): enable xephyr

On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 3:19 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote: > --- >  recipes/xorg-xserver/xserver-xorg_1.9.4.bb |    4 ++-- >  1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/recipes/xorg-xserver/xserver-xorg_1.9.4.bb > b/recipes/xorg-xserver/xserver-xorg_1.9.4.bb > index 89e7a03..cc

Re: [oe] [PATCH v2] lowpan-tools_0.2.2; : fix build with static libnl1

Hello. On Mon, 2011-04-11 at 13:29, Anders Darander wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 12:57, Stefan Schmidt > wrote: > > On Mon, 2011-04-11 at 11:08, Anders Darander wrote: > >> I'll try to make a somewhat better explanation in the included patch > >> during the evening, and I can also remove

Re: [oe] [PATCH v2] lowpan-tools_0.2.2; : fix build with static libnl1

Hi, On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 12:57, Stefan Schmidt wrote: > On Mon, 2011-04-11 at 11:08, Anders Darander wrote: >> I'll try to make a somewhat better explanation in the included patch during >> the evening, and I can also remove the PR bump before submitting a third >> revision of the patch. Hop

Re: [oe] [PATCH v2] lowpan-tools_0.2.2; : fix build with static libnl1

Hello. On Mon, 2011-04-11 at 11:08, Anders Darander wrote: > > > On 11 apr 2011, at 10:02, "Martin Jansa" wrote: > > > On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 07:27:21PM +0200, Anders Darander wrote: > >> * add NL_CFLAGS to a few Makefiles.am > > > > look like adding -D_GNU_SOURCE not $(NL_CFLAGS) except ipl

Re: [oe] [PATCH v2] lowpan-tools_0.2.2; : fix build with static libnl1

On 11 apr 2011, at 10:02, "Martin Jansa" wrote: > On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 07:27:21PM +0200, Anders Darander wrote: >> * add NL_CFLAGS to a few Makefiles.am > > look like adding -D_GNU_SOURCE not $(NL_CFLAGS) except iplink/Makefile.am > and lib/Makefile.am, why was -D_GNU_SOURCE needed? Hm, I

Re: [oe] [PATCH v2] lowpan-tools_0.2.2; : fix build with static libnl1

On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 07:27:21PM +0200, Anders Darander wrote: > * add NL_CFLAGS to a few Makefiles.am look like adding -D_GNU_SOURCE not $(NL_CFLAGS) except iplink/Makefile.am and lib/Makefile.am, why was -D_GNU_SOURCE needed? and lowpan-tools_0.2.2.bb gets PR bump from INC_PR, no need to bum