On 08/24/2011 12:49 PM, Henning Heinold wrote:
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 12:02:49PM -0700, Philip Balister wrote:
I am seeing this building openjade. As near as I can see, there
haven't been any changes to cause this. It does build in
release-2011.3-maintenance.
Anyone have any clues?
Philip
| +
On 24/08/2011 21:43, Jan Kobler wrote:
Hi,
I have encountered the problem with the missing gl_GLIBC21 too.
This is what solved the problem for me:
bitbake -c clean gettext-native
bitbake gettext-native
Afterwards the string "GLIBC21" appears in
sysroots/x86_64-linux/usr/share/aclocal/glibc21.
On 08/24/2011 12:49 PM, Henning Heinold wrote:
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 12:02:49PM -0700, Philip Balister wrote:
I am seeing this building openjade. As near as I can see, there
haven't been any changes to cause this. It does build in
release-2011.3-maintenance.
Anyone have any clues?
Philip
| +
Hi,
I have encountered the problem with the missing gl_GLIBC21 too.
This is what solved the problem for me:
bitbake -c clean gettext-native
bitbake gettext-native
Afterwards the string "GLIBC21" appears in
sysroots/x86_64-linux/usr/share/aclocal/glibc21.m4 and
sysroots/x86_64-linux/usr/share/ac
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 12:02:49PM -0700, Philip Balister wrote:
> I am seeing this building openjade. As near as I can see, there
> haven't been any changes to cause this. It does build in
> release-2011.3-maintenance.
>
> Anyone have any clues?
>
> Philip
> | + install-catalog --add
> /home/ba
I am seeing this building openjade. As near as I can see, there haven't
been any changes to cause this. It does build in release-2011.3-maintenance.
Anyone have any clues?
Philip
| oe_libinstall: cp -P libogrove.so
/home/balister/oe/tmp/work/x86_64-linux/openjade-native-1.3.2-r5/image/home/ba
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Op 24-08-11 19:40, Tom Rini schreef:
> On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 8:22 AM, Jesse Gilles wrote:
>> On Tue, 2011-08-23 at 13:16 -0400, George C. Huntington, III wrote:
>>> I suspect that the problem is happening earlier, classpath isn't building.
>>> the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Op 24-08-11 19:35, Tom Rini schreef:
> On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 1:03 AM, Noor, Ahsan wrote:
>> From: Noor Ahsan
>>
>> * Imported from OE commit id bac6441118e0b78d55c98afdc108f03b6c655909
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Noor Ahsan
>
> NAK, All of the patches
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 8:22 AM, Jesse Gilles wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-08-23 at 13:16 -0400, George C. Huntington, III wrote:
>> I suspect that the problem is happening earlier, classpath isn't building.
>> the javac wrapper eats the return code from a java compile.
>
> If George is right, then the
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 3:05 AM, Noor, Ahsan wrote:
> From: Noor Ahsan
>
> * Imported from oe.dev commit id 0ff10ecb88de73074ae4857046643cef15dc4e97 and
> c10c33f86903c93611023197a7f812459c2dfe2d.
> * Combined .inc and bb file from oe.dev and made a single bb file.
> * Removed EXTRA_OECONF_appen
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 1:03 AM, Noor, Ahsan wrote:
> From: Noor Ahsan
>
> * Imported from OE commit id bac6441118e0b78d55c98afdc108f03b6c655909
>
> Signed-off-by: Noor Ahsan
NAK, All of the patches are missing the patch header described in
http://wiki.openembedded.org/index.php/Commit_Patch_Me
Am 24.08.2011 17:14, schrieb Martin Jansa:
> On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 04:57:31PM +0200, Steffen Sledz wrote:
>> On 24.08.2011 16:45, Martin Jansa wrote:
>>> On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 04:34:06PM +0200, Steffen Sledz wrote:
On 24.08.2011 14:36, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote:
> W dniu 24.08.2011 14:3
On Tue, 2011-08-23 at 13:16 -0400, George C. Huntington, III wrote:
> I suspect that the problem is happening earlier, classpath isn't building.
> the javac wrapper eats the return code from a java compile.
If George is right, then the following patch to the javac wrapper script
may fix the issue
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Op 24-08-11 13:03, Steffen Sledz schreef:
> We like to create an upstart based image. Therefor we use
>
> IMAGE_INIT_MANAGER = "upstart upstart-sysvcompat sysvinit-utils"
>
> inside our image recipe.
>
> Unfortunately our image somehow inherits task
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 04:57:31PM +0200, Steffen Sledz wrote:
> On 24.08.2011 16:45, Martin Jansa wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 04:34:06PM +0200, Steffen Sledz wrote:
> >> On 24.08.2011 14:36, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote:
> >>> W dniu 24.08.2011 14:31, Steffen Sledz pisze:
> BTW: What is th
On 24.08.2011 16:45, Martin Jansa wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 04:34:06PM +0200, Steffen Sledz wrote:
>> On 24.08.2011 14:36, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote:
>>> W dniu 24.08.2011 14:31, Steffen Sledz pisze:
BTW: What is the exact meaning/purpose/use of task-proper-tools?
>>>
>>> Replace busybo
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 04:34:06PM +0200, Steffen Sledz wrote:
> On 24.08.2011 14:36, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote:
> > W dniu 24.08.2011 14:31, Steffen Sledz pisze:
> >> BTW:
> >> What is the exact meaning/purpose/use of task-proper-tools?
> >
> > Replace busybox components by full versions. Was made
On 24.08.2011 14:36, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote:
> W dniu 24.08.2011 14:31, Steffen Sledz pisze:
>> BTW:
>> What is the exact meaning/purpose/use of task-proper-tools?
>
> Replace busybox components by full versions. Was made years ago and then
> updated by several people. While working for BugLabs
On 24.08.2011 16:26, Cliff Brake wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 7:03 AM, Steffen Sledz wrote:
>> We like to create an upstart based image. Therefor we use
>
> Steffen, what are your thoughts on upstart vs systemd? I am moving
> toward systemd for one project, but I'm interested in what others
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 7:03 AM, Steffen Sledz wrote:
> We like to create an upstart based image. Therefor we use
Steffen, what are your thoughts on upstart vs systemd? I am moving
toward systemd for one project, but I'm interested in what others are
choosing and why.
Thanks,
Cliff
--
===
From: Noor Ahsan
* Imported from oe.dev commit id 821f47e170dddabaef3925fd62c5423210dcb363.
Signed-off-by: Noor Ahsan
---
.../tiobench-0.3.3/tiobench-makefile.patch | 47
.../recipes-benchmark/tiobench/tiobench_0.3.3.bb | 25 ++
2 files changed, 72 in
W dniu 24.08.2011 14:31, Steffen Sledz pisze:
> BTW:
> What is the exact meaning/purpose/use of task-proper-tools?
Replace busybox components by full versions. Was made years ago and then
updated by several people. While working for BugLabs company I used it
to create rootfs without busybox.
> Th
On 24.08.2011 13:03, Steffen Sledz wrote:
> We like to create an upstart based image. Therefor we use
>
> IMAGE_INIT_MANAGER = "upstart upstart-sysvcompat sysvinit-utils"
>
> inside our image recipe.
>
> Unfortunately our image somehow inherits task-proper-tools which contains an
> RDEPEND fo
From: Noor Ahsan
* Imported from oe.dev commit id d6f49fe115206047b41b0195724ba872897ef531
Signed-off-by: Noor Ahsan
---
meta-oe/recipes-benchmark/dbench/dbench_4.0.bb | 26
.../recipes-benchmark/dbench/files/destdir.patch | 23 +
.../recipes-benc
We like to create an upstart based image. Therefor we use
IMAGE_INIT_MANAGER = "upstart upstart-sysvcompat sysvinit-utils"
inside our image recipe.
Unfortunately our image somehow inherits task-proper-tools which contains an
RDEPEND for sysvinit. This results in
-->sn
On 24.08.2011 12:03, Stefan Herbrechtsmeier wrote:
> Hi,
>
> commit 105d881227d06f31c180dffb777ee63361b2f2b8
> 'gcc: Package libstdc++ gdb python helpers into dev package'
> breaks meta-toolchain generation. See also [1]
>
> This commit adds dev packages (libstdc++-dev libgcc-dev) to
> gcc-cross
From: Noor Ahsan
* Imported from oe.dev commit id 0ff10ecb88de73074ae4857046643cef15dc4e97 and
c10c33f86903c93611023197a7f812459c2dfe2d.
* Combined .inc and bb file from oe.dev and made a single bb file.
* Removed EXTRA_OECONF_append_epia = " --disable-threads" while importing as
this should go
Hi,
commit 105d881227d06f31c180dffb777ee63361b2f2b8
'gcc: Package libstdc++ gdb python helpers into dev package'
breaks meta-toolchain generation. See also [1]
This commit adds dev packages (libstdc++-dev libgcc-dev) to
gcc-cross (gcc-package-cross.inc) which are already part of
gcc. The libgcc
On Wed, 24 Aug 2011 11:02:05 +0200 Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
> On Wednesday, August 24, 2011 00:11:39 Vitus Jensen wrote:
> > Hej!
> >
> > I would like to use a layered filesystem in our ppc603e-based machine:
> > the rootfs built from openembedded would be read-only, any
> > customizations go to a
On Wednesday, August 24, 2011 00:11:39 Vitus Jensen wrote:
> Hej!
>
> I would like to use a layered filesystem in our ppc603e-based machine: the
> rootfs built from openembedded would be read-only, any customizations go
> to a writable filesystem and should the need occur to start fresh all I
> ne
From: Noor Ahsan
* Imported from OE commit id bac6441118e0b78d55c98afdc108f03b6c655909
Signed-off-by: Noor Ahsan
---
.../lmbench/lmbench-3.0-a9/obey-ranlib.patch | 25 +++
.../lmbench-3.0-a9/update-results-script.patch | 155
.../recipes-benchmark/lmbench/lmbe
31 matches
Mail list logo
