On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 3:26 PM, Rich Pixley wrote:
> I'm having trouble even parsing using bitbake > 1.12.
>
> Am I right in thinking that the openembedded tree isn't ready to be built
> with bitbake > 1.12?
I have used 1.10.x successfully with old oe classic but that was sometime ago
if you want
On 08.02.2012 20:48, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 17:35, Andreas Oberritter wrote:
>
>> I already explained in the commit message, why a PR bump is not needed.
>> Can you please explain which other possible failures you're expecting,
>> so I can learn why my reasoning may be wro
I'm having trouble even parsing using bitbake > 1.12.
Am I right in thinking that the openembedded tree isn't ready to be
built with bitbake > 1.12?
If so, then the getting started document should probably include this info.
--rich
___
Openembedded
On Feb 8, 2012 9:29 PM, "Khem Raj" wrote:
I am redoing the full merge now, with my usual (super cautious) hat on.
Anyway, can you reproduce the ?etnetgrent() stuff with sato?
It is amazing how anybody seems to fail to get recommendations (think
configure flags) right.
How hard can it be to have
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 12:17 PM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
wrote:
> Fcntl{,64} is a nightmare, yes. But your hunk does not strike me as
> immediately helpful.
> arm/ioperm hidden def removal is OK, I think, without having sources at
> hand.
> The socketcall hunk is nonsense, see my previous reply t
On Feb 8, 2012 8:19 PM, "Khem Raj" wrote:
>
> On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 10:42 AM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
> wrote:
> > Core-image-sato does not build for me due to some buggy package that
> > unconditionally uses *netgrp() or the like.
> > Not amused, way out without going beserk?
>
> Yeah with fut
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 17:35, Andreas Oberritter wrote:
> I already explained in the commit message, why a PR bump is not needed.
> Can you please explain which other possible failures you're expecting,
> so I can learn why my reasoning may be wrong?
>
> This patch only fixes an unavailable build
On 08.02.2012 19:41, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 12:03, Andreas Oberritter wrote:
>
>> There's no need to alter configure flags, because without x11,
>> libsm cannot be picked up accidentially. Because this just fixes
>> a missing dependency failure without x11, no PR bump is r
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 10:42 AM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
wrote:
> Core-image-sato does not build for me due to some buggy package that
> unconditionally uses *netgrp() or the like.
> Not amused, way out without going beserk?
Yeah with future branch here is my patch. git am it.
http://uclibc.org
On Feb 8, 2012 4:53 PM, "Khem Raj" wrote:
>
> On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 7:15 AM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
> wrote:
> > I am merging your future branch into master ATM. A couple of questions:
>
> Bernhard
>
> As i have said earlier currently there are regressions where X does
> not start. and its har
On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 12:03, Andreas Oberritter wrote:
> There's no need to alter configure flags, because without x11,
> libsm cannot be picked up accidentially. Because this just fixes
> a missing dependency failure without x11, no PR bump is required
> either.
>
I do prefer a clear configure
Ping.
Patchwork URL: http://patches.openembedded.org/patch/20561/
On 02.02.2012 15:03, Andreas Oberritter wrote:
> If DISTRO_FEATURES doesn't contain x11, libsm is not available.
> As libsm is optional, the dependency is changed to be conditional.
> There's no need to alter configure flags, becau
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 14:44, Koen Kooi wrote:
> Those 3 are indeed not in ${PN}, but does that really need a seperate
> patch?
This fixes another thing that is not cited on the commit log :-( I'd prefer
it to be explicited on the commit log or another commit for it.
--
Otavio Salvador
Op 8 feb. 2012, om 17:34 heeft Otavio Salvador het volgende geschreven:
> On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 14:31, Koen Kooi wrote:
> ...
> > +${libdir}/binfmt.d \
> > +${libdir}/modules-load.d \
> > +${libdir}/sysctl.d \
>
> It's not unrelated, FILES_${PN}
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 14:31, Koen Kooi wrote:
> ...
>
> +${libdir}/binfmt.d \
> > +${libdir}/modules-load.d \
> > +${libdir}/sysctl.d \
>
> It's not unrelated, FILES_${PN} changed from += to =, so we need to mop up
> the stray files.
>
Those are n
Op 8 feb. 2012, om 17:24 heeft Otavio Salvador het volgende geschreven:
> On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 10:50, Koen Kooi wrote:
> ...
> @@ -93,6 +98,11 @@ FILES_${PN} += " ${base_bindir}/* \
> ${bindir}/systemd* \
> ${libdir}/tmpfiles.d/*.conf \
> ${libd
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 10:50, Koen Kooi wrote:
> ...
@@ -93,6 +98,11 @@ FILES_${PN} += " ${base_bindir}/* \
> ${bindir}/systemd* \
> ${libdir}/tmpfiles.d/*.conf \
> ${libdir}/systemd \
> +${libdir}/binfmt.d \
> +${li
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 11:19, Khem Raj wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 4:14 AM, Koen Kooi
> wrote:
> > That is why I want to make an exception for polkit and udisks to keep
> > initmanager selection an IMAGE_FEATURE combined with DISTRO_FEATURE. A
> > distro maintainer can then choose to support
On 02/05/2012 04:12 PM, Peter Tworek wrote:
On 02/04/2012 07:52 PM, Andreas Müller wrote:
On Sat, Feb 4, 2012 at 7:30 PM, Peter Tworek
wrote:
Run tested on netbook pro.
Signed-off-by: Peter Tworek
---
meta-xfce/recipes-xfce/xfconf/xfconf_4.8.0.bb | 15 ---
meta-xfce/recipes
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 4:14 AM, Koen Kooi wrote:
> That is why I want to make an exception for polkit and udisks to keep
> initmanager selection an IMAGE_FEATURE combined with DISTRO_FEATURE. A
> distro maintainer can then choose to support one or more initmanagers and in
> the case for multiple i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Op 08-02-12 13:43, Martin Jansa schreef:
> On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 10:28:12AM -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 10:14, Koen Kooi
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Images with sysvinit will be working the same as before, just with
>>> libsystemd
On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 01:51:54PM +0100, Andreas Müller wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 1:14 PM, Koen Kooi wrote:
> > That is why I want to make an exception for polkit and udisks to keep
> > initmanager selection an IMAGE_FEATURE combined with DISTRO_FEATURE. A
> > distro maintainer can then cho
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Op 08-02-12 13:51, Andreas Müller schreef:
> On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 1:14 PM, Koen Kooi
> wrote:
>> That is why I want to make an exception for polkit and udisks to keep
>> initmanager selection an IMAGE_FEATURE combined with DISTRO_FEATURE. A
>> dis
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 1:14 PM, Koen Kooi wrote:
> That is why I want to make an exception for polkit and udisks to keep
> initmanager selection an IMAGE_FEATURE combined with DISTRO_FEATURE. A
> distro maintainer can then choose to support one or more initmanagers and in
> the case for multiple i
Signed-off-by: Koen Kooi
---
meta-oe/recipes-core/systemd/systemd_git.bb | 14 --
1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/meta-oe/recipes-core/systemd/systemd_git.bb
b/meta-oe/recipes-core/systemd/systemd_git.bb
index c1a0117..4c458bd 100644
--- a/meta-oe/re
Op 8 feb. 2012, om 13:18 heeft Paul Eggleton het volgende geschreven:
> On Wednesday 08 February 2012 13:14:27 Koen Kooi wrote:
>> Images with sysvinit will be working the same as before, just with
>> libsystemd-logind.so.X being installed.
>
> Just out of interest, how large is that file?
A co
On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 10:28:12AM -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 10:14, Koen Kooi wrote:
>
> > Images with sysvinit will be working the same as before, just with
> > libsystemd-logind.so.X being installed. Images with systemd get working
> > session tracking.
> >
>
> AFA
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 10:14, Koen Kooi wrote:
> Images with sysvinit will be working the same as before, just with
> libsystemd-logind.so.X being installed. Images with systemd get working
> session tracking.
>
AFAIK polkit uses consolekit or systemd. In case you build it with systemd
you break
Op 8 feb. 2012, om 13:18 heeft Paul Eggleton het volgende geschreven:
> On Wednesday 08 February 2012 13:14:27 Koen Kooi wrote:
>> Images with sysvinit will be working the same as before, just with
>> libsystemd-logind.so.X being installed.
>
> Just out of interest, how large is that file?
On m
On Wednesday 08 February 2012 13:14:27 Koen Kooi wrote:
> Images with sysvinit will be working the same as before, just with
> libsystemd-logind.so.X being installed.
Just out of interest, how large is that file?
Cheers,
Paul
--
Paul Eggleton
Intel Open Source Technology Centre
__
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Op 08-02-12 12:12, Otavio Salvador schreef:
> On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 09:07, Koen Kooi
> wrote:
>
>> If it's just polkit and udisks and image feature works well enough.
>> Perfect is the enemy of good and all that.
>
>
> How I'd generate an image wi
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 12:07 PM, Koen Kooi wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Op 08-02-12 12:00, Otavio Salvador schreef:
>> On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 06:18, Koen Kooi
>> wrote:
>>
>>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1
>>>
>>> Op 08-02-12 01:39, Joshua Lock schr
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 09:07, Koen Kooi wrote:
> If it's just polkit and udisks and image feature works well enough. Perfect
> is the enemy of good and all that.
How I'd generate an image with polkit with systemd support?
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-mail: ota
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Op 08-02-12 12:00, Otavio Salvador schreef:
> On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 06:18, Koen Kooi
> wrote:
>
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Op 08-02-12 01:39, Joshua Lock schreef:
>>> It looks like systemd provides various interfaces and
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 06:18, Koen Kooi wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Op 08-02-12 01:39, Joshua Lock schreef:
> > It looks like systemd provides various interfaces and API's that packages
> > may or may not use and as more packages adopt these we're going to need
>
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 22:39, Joshua Lock wrote:
>
> * The init system ought to be a DISTRO_FEATURE (as sysvinit ought to be
>> too
>> IMO)
>>
>
> I know there's some disagreement with the suggestion that the init system
> ought to be a DISTRO_FEATURE but my (admittedly uninformed) opinion is tha
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 08:40, Andreas Müller
wrote:
> If I understand this right, the angstrom default is kicked out by my
> local.conf. Since I use this configuration for a while now: What has
> changed causing the directories missing?
>
We are slowly fixing postinst scripts to work off-line and
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 5:39 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 14:35, Andreas Müller
> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 4:12 PM, Andreas Müller
>> wrote:
>> > What I have already
>> > detected after a build from scatch is that /var/lib/opkg is missing in
>> the
>> > image (a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Op 08-02-12 01:39, Joshua Lock schreef:
> On 07/02/12 07:55, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 13:12, Andreas Müller
>> wrote:
>>
>>> * These are my first python experiences - suggestions welcome. * In
>>> local.conf (or in distro) the
39 matches
Mail list logo
