On (10/09/12 18:12), Tilman Baumann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm working on a TI DM812x support overlay.
> I guess what it comes down to is a new kernel recipe (based on TI's
> sources) and this funny two stage u-boot.
> I think I can write the recipes. But what I don't quite see is how I
> would add a ne
Hi all,
For anyone doing development on the AT91-based platforms, there is a known
issue with at91bootstrap and gcc 4.6 (and later) where the
linker erroneously causes an overlap between sections. There is a known
fix here, just needs to be turned into a patch file for OE:
http://www.at91.com/fo
On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 2:35 PM, wrote:
> From: Jack Mitchell
>
> V5
>
> - FILES_{PN} no loger required now libdir and includedir are passed to
> oe_runmake
>
> V4
>
> - Remove debian packaging patch, it is not needed
>
> Signed-off-by: Jack Mitchell
> ---
> .../recipes-extended/liblockdev/libl
Hi,
I'm working on a TI DM812x support overlay.
I guess what it comes down to is a new kernel recipe (based on TI's
sources) and this funny two stage u-boot.
I think I can write the recipes. But what I don't quite see is how I
would add a new supported machine in the first place?
I was trying t
On 10/09/12 15:22, Phil Blundell wrote:
On Mon, 2012-09-10 at 15:16 +0100, Jack Mitchell wrote:
Ok, re-building now - will let you know how it goes. I removed the -Wall
flag. It makes no sense at all as the -Wall flag is passed using the :=
operator, is that not a contradiction in itself?!
Soun
On Mon, 2012-09-10 at 15:16 +0100, Jack Mitchell wrote:
> Ok, re-building now - will let you know how it goes. I removed the -Wall
> flag. It makes no sense at all as the -Wall flag is passed using the :=
> operator, is that not a contradiction in itself?!
Sounds like you might be looking at the
On 10/09/12 14:08, Phil Blundell wrote:
On Mon, 2012-09-10 at 14:00 +0100, Jack Mitchell wrote:
What is a portable version of ':=', maybe '+='? I can't get anything but
unrelated hits from Google.
I don't think there is any portable equivalent. However, if you know
you will always be using GNU
On 10/09/12 14:15, Martin Jansa wrote:
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 02:00:12PM +0100, Jack Mitchell wrote:
First off:
| automake: warnings are treated as errors
| lib/Makefile.am:22: warning: ':='-style assignments are not portable
| lib/Makefile.am:23: warning: ':='-style assignments are not portab
Changelog since 2012-09-02 until 2012-09-09. Projects included in this report:
bitbake: git://git.openembedded.org/bitbake
openembedded-core: git://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core
meta-openembedded: git://git.openembedded.org/meta-openembedded
meta-smartphone: http://git.shr-project.org/re
On Mon, 2012-09-10 at 14:00 +0100, Jack Mitchell wrote:
> What is a portable version of ':=', maybe '+='? I can't get anything but
> unrelated hits from Google.
I don't think there is any portable equivalent. However, if you know
you will always be using GNU make then the portability is somethin
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 02:00:12PM +0100, Jack Mitchell wrote:
> First off:
>
> | automake: warnings are treated as errors
> | lib/Makefile.am:22: warning: ':='-style assignments are not portable
> | lib/Makefile.am:23: warning: ':='-style assignments are not portable
> | autoreconf: automake fail
First off:
| automake: warnings are treated as errors
| lib/Makefile.am:22: warning: ':='-style assignments are not portable
| lib/Makefile.am:23: warning: ':='-style assignments are not portable
| autoreconf: automake failed with exit status: 1
| ERROR: autoreconf execution failed.
What is a po
Signed-off-by: Martin Jansa
---
...lated-workarounds-in-cpu-features-detecti.patch | 144 -
...mplementation-of-pixman_blt-with-overlapp.patch | 127 --
.../xorg-lib/pixman_0.27.2.bbappend| 13 --
3 files changed, 284 deletions(-)
delete mode
This is about to be removed from OE-Core, so add it here for those that
still want it.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton
---
.../zeroconf/zeroconf/compilefix.patch | 19
.../zeroconf/zeroconf/debian-zeroconf | 51
.../zeroconf/zeroconf/zeroco
On Monday 10 September 2012 07:34:39 Joe MacDonald wrote:
> [[meta-networking][PATCH] zeroconf: add from OE-Core] On 12.09.09 (Sun
21:56) Paul Eggleton wrote:
> > This is about to be removed from OE-Core, so add it here for those that
> > still want it.
>
> I've wondered about this, considering h
[[meta-networking][PATCH] zeroconf: add from OE-Core] On 12.09.09 (Sun 21:56)
Paul Eggleton wrote:
> This is about to be removed from OE-Core, so add it here for those that
> still want it.
>
I've wondered about this, considering how long ago my original proposal
was and we haven't really gotten
From: Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli
The bug is located here:
http://www.shr-project.org/trac/ticket/2058
The patch will probably be sent upstream by its author.
Signed-off-by: Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli
---
...position-as-percent-and-define-a-1-second.patch | 133 +
meta-efl/recipe
17 matches
Mail list logo
