[oe] Can a .bbappend introduce a different PACKAGE_ARCH ?

2013-04-06 Thread Carlos Rafael Giani
Hello, assume there is package foo, which is normally not dependent on a specific machine. It is built with default, machine independent configuration options. But then I want to add a .bbappend to it, which add some configuration options that make it machine dependent (imagine something like

Re: [oe] Can a .bbappend introduce a different PACKAGE_ARCH ?

2013-04-06 Thread Gary Thomas
On 2013-04-06 04:50, Carlos Rafael Giani wrote: Hello, assume there is package foo, which is normally not dependent on a specific machine. It is built with default, machine independent configuration options. But then I want to add a .bbappend to it, which add some configuration options that ma

Re: [oe] [meta-oe][PATCH 4/4] qt4: remove bbappends

2013-04-06 Thread Otavio Salvador
On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 8:35 PM, Paul Eggleton wrote: > These changes to Qt's configuration need to be applied in distro layers, > not in meta-oe. > > Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton NACK! Keep PRINC as otherwise revision will go backwards. -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Syste

Re: [oe] [meta-oe][PATCH 3/4] packagegroup-qte-toolchain-target: remove bbappend

2013-04-06 Thread Otavio Salvador
On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 8:35 PM, Paul Eggleton wrote: > This added Qwt to the Qt Embedded toolchain. This is a distro policy > decision, and in any case Qwt is a third-party library which is not part > of Qt. Distros that wish to do this should add this bbappend to their > own layers. > > Signed-of

Re: [oe] [meta-oe][PATCH 1/4] libmad: remove

2013-04-06 Thread Otavio Salvador
On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 8:35 PM, Paul Eggleton wrote: > This is largely equivalent to the recipe in OE-Core apart from > LICENSE_FLAGS, insignificant patch differences, and an additional patch > for avr32 optimisation (and since there appears to be no public layer > for an avr32 machine, there's no

Re: [oe] [meta-oe][PATCH 2/4] icon-naming-utils: remove

2013-04-06 Thread Otavio Salvador
On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 8:35 PM, Paul Eggleton wrote: > This version is now in OE-Core. > > Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton Acked-by: Otavio Salvador -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854

Re: [oe] [meta-oe][PATCH 0/4] Clean up recipes

2013-04-06 Thread Otavio Salvador
On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 8:35 PM, Paul Eggleton wrote: > Drop some items that should no longer be in meta-oe. The Qt ones need to be reworked to keep the upgrade path. I replied accordingly. -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.oss

[oe] List of distro policies?

2013-04-06 Thread Carlos Rafael Giani
Hello, is there a list of settings, values, policies that are distro specific? I haven't found anything like that so far, and the only source of information about what is allowed and what isn't has been this mailing list and the IRC channel. For example, I am suspecting that MULTI_PROVIDER_WH

Re: [oe] [meta-oe][PATCH 4/4] qt4: remove bbappends

2013-04-06 Thread Paul Eggleton
On Saturday 06 April 2013 10:36:41 Otavio Salvador wrote: > On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 8:35 PM, Paul Eggleton > wrote: > > These changes to Qt's configuration need to be applied in distro layers, > > not in meta-oe. > > > > Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton > > NACK! > > Keep PRINC as otherwise revisio

Re: [oe] [meta-oe][PATCH 4/4] qt4: remove bbappends

2013-04-06 Thread Otavio Salvador
On Sat, Apr 6, 2013 at 4:28 PM, Paul Eggleton wrote: > On Saturday 06 April 2013 10:36:41 Otavio Salvador wrote: >> On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 8:35 PM, Paul Eggleton >> wrote: >> > These changes to Qt's configuration need to be applied in distro layers, >> > not in meta-oe. >> > >> > Signed-off-by: P