Søren Holm s...@sgh.dk wrote:
Hello
What is the best way to manage a private repo with recipes as well as
meta-oe,
meta-core and meta-angstrom.
Currently I have a private repo that has the layers attached as
submodules. Is
that a crazy setup or what?
We're doing the same internally at
On 20 October 2013 20:43, Martin Jansa martin.ja...@gmail.com wrote:
libtool-cross-2.4.2: libtool-cross: configure was passed unrecognised
options: --with-sysroot
libxdmcp-1.1.1: libxdmcp: configure was passed unrecognised options:
--without-groff --disable-malloc0returnsnull
cut
qemux86* common (5):
meta-openembedded/meta-initramfs/recipes-bsp/images/initramfs-kexecboot-klibc-image.bb,
do_rootfs
/cut
Hi Martin, thanks for taking care of all those builds.
About this new do_rootfs failure [1], it seems related to update-rc.d
/postinst code.
As you already know,
On Monday 21 October 2013 09:29:27 Anders Darander wrote:
Søren Holm s...@sgh.dk wrote:
What is the best way to manage a private repo with recipes as well as
meta-oe,
meta-core and meta-angstrom.
Currently I have a private repo that has the layers attached as
submodules. Is that a crazy
On 21 October 2013 09:29, Anders Darander and...@chargestorm.se wrote:
We're doing the same internally at ChargeStorm. One benefit is that we're
having our
master repo keeping track of all the layers that we're using and which
revision of
those layers.
Guacamayo uses a master repository
On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 10:58:45AM +0200, Andrea Adami wrote:
cut
qemux86* common (5):
meta-openembedded/meta-initramfs/recipes-bsp/images/initramfs-kexecboot-klibc-image.bb,
do_rootfs
/cut
Hi Martin, thanks for taking care of all those builds.
About this new do_rootfs failure [1], it
On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 12:38 PM, Martin Jansa martin.ja...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 10:58:45AM +0200, Andrea Adami wrote:
cut
qemux86* common (5):
meta-openembedded/meta-initramfs/recipes-bsp/images/initramfs-kexecboot-klibc-image.bb,
do_rootfs
/cut
Hi Martin, thanks
On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 09:29:27AM +0100, Anders Darander wrote:
Søren Holm s...@sgh.dk wrote:
Hello
What is the best way to manage a private repo with recipes as well as
meta-oe,
meta-core and meta-angstrom.
Currently I have a private repo that has the layers attached as
On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 7:01 AM, Paul Eggleton
paul.eggle...@linux.intel.com wrote:
On Monday 21 October 2013 09:29:27 Anders Darander wrote:
Søren Holm s...@sgh.dk wrote:
What is the best way to manage a private repo with recipes as well as
meta-oe,
meta-core and meta-angstrom.
Currently
On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 5:53 AM, Martin Jansa martin.ja...@gmail.com wrote:
* 3.3 is used by default mesa config, 2.8 is used in meta-java, keep 2.9 as
last in 2*
who is using 2.9 ? I would suggest to keep the one we know is used.
Signed-off-by: Martin Jansa martin.ja...@gmail.com
---
Thanks for your replies. It was very reassuring that I'm not doing the wrong
thing.
--
Søren Holm
___
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
On 10/19/2013 12:29 AM, Joe MacDonald wrote:
Hi Roy,
Is this different from the patch I received from Ming Liu about a month
ago? It doesn't look it at first glance, but I didn't diff the two.
-J.
Sorry, I did not sync my repo, LiuMing patch is OK.
Thanks
-Roy
[[oe] [PATCH 2/2
12 matches
Mail list logo