Re: [oe] [PATCH 1/5] libnma: initial add 1.8.28

2020-03-19 Thread Chen, Qi
Hi Andreas, I got the following error. gcr was skipped: missing required distro feature 'x11' (not in DISTRO_FEATURES) ERROR: Required build target 'meta-world-pkgdata' has no buildable providers. Missing or unbuildable dependency chain was: ['meta-world-pkgdata', 'libnma', 'gcr'] Could you

[oe] [meta-python] [PATCH] python3-yarl: Enable ptest

2020-03-19 Thread Zang Ruochen
Signed-off-by: Zang Ruochen --- .../recipes-devtools/python/python-yarl.inc | 15 ++- .../python/python3-yarl/run-ptest | 3 +++ 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) create mode 100644 meta-python/recipes-devtools/python/python3-yarl/run-ptest

[oe] [PATCH] [meta-python] [PATCH] python3-yappi: Enable ptest

2020-03-19 Thread Zang Ruochen
Signed-off-by: Zang Ruochen --- .../recipes-devtools/python/python-yappi.inc | 18 +- .../python/python3-yappi/run-ptest | 3 +++ 2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) create mode 100644 meta-python/recipes-devtools/python/python3-yappi/run-ptest diff

[oe] [meta-python] [PATCH] python3-xxhash: Enable ptest

2020-03-19 Thread Zang Ruochen
Signed-off-by: Zang Ruochen --- .../recipes-devtools/python/python-xxhash.inc | 15 +++ .../python/python3-xxhash/run-ptest | 3 +++ 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+) create mode 100644 meta-python/recipes-devtools/python/python3-xxhash/run-ptest diff --git

[oe] [meta-python] [PATCH] python3-xmltodict: Enable ptest

2020-03-19 Thread Zang Ruochen
Signed-off-by: Zang Ruochen --- .../python/python3-xmltodict/run-ptest| 3 +++ .../python/python3-xmltodict_0.12.0.bb| 15 ++- 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) create mode 100644

[oe] [PATCH] [meta-python] [PATCH] python3-xlrd: Enable ptest

2020-03-19 Thread Zang Ruochen
Signed-off-by: Zang Ruochen --- .../recipes-devtools/python/python-xlrd.inc | 16 .../python/python3-xlrd/run-ptest| 3 +++ 2 files changed, 19 insertions(+) create mode 100644 meta-python/recipes-devtools/python/python3-xlrd/run-ptest diff --git

[oe] [meta-python] [PATCH] python3-webcolors: Enable ptest

2020-03-19 Thread Zang Ruochen
Signed-off-by: Zang Ruochen --- .../recipes-devtools/python/python-webcolors.inc | 14 ++ .../python/python3-webcolors/run-ptest | 2 ++ 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+) create mode 100644 meta-python/recipes-devtools/python/python3-webcolors/run-ptest diff --git

[oe] [meta-networking][PATCH] civetweb: upgrade 1.11 -> 1.12

2020-03-19 Thread Wang Mingyu
-License-Update: Copyright year updated to 2020. Signed-off-by: Wang Mingyu --- .../recipes-connectivity/civetweb/civetweb_git.bb | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/meta-networking/recipes-connectivity/civetweb/civetweb_git.bb

Re: [oe] [zeus 00/13] Patch review

2020-03-19 Thread Khem Raj
On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 4:16 PM akuster808 wrote: > > > > On 3/19/20 1:44 AM, Khem Raj wrote: > > look > What does that mean? `s OK` got stuck in transmission. > > - armin > > > > On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 7:58 PM Armin Kuster wrote: > >> Here is the next set for meta-openembedded. > >> Please

Re: [oe] [zeus 00/13] Patch review

2020-03-19 Thread Tim Orling
On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 4:16 PM akuster808 wrote: > > > On 3/19/20 1:44 AM, Khem Raj wrote: > > look > What does that mean? This is an all time favorite terse Khem review! > - armin > > > > On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 7:58 PM Armin Kuster > wrote: > >> Here is the next set for

Re: [oe] [zeus 00/13] Patch review

2020-03-19 Thread akuster808
On 3/19/20 1:44 AM, Khem Raj wrote: > look What does that mean? - armin > > On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 7:58 PM Armin Kuster wrote: >> Here is the next set for meta-openembedded. >> Please have reviews back by Friday. >> >> The following changes since commit

[oe] [meta-oe][PATCH] nvme-cli: upgrade 1.9 -> 1.10.1

2020-03-19 Thread Pierre-Jean Texier via Openembedded-devel
Also backport a patch to fix a build failure with the mucl libc. Signed-off-by: Pierre-Jean Texier --- .../nvme-cli/0001-fix-musl-compilation.patch | 26 ++ .../{nvme-cli_1.9.bb => nvme-cli_1.10.1.bb}| 6 +++-- 2 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Re: [oe] proper way to report(?) conflicting files being installed?

2020-03-19 Thread Robert P. J. Day
On Thu, 19 Mar 2020, Ross Burton wrote: > On 19/03/2020 17:32, Adrian Bunk wrote: > >>this does seem backwards ... if both gnome-common and > >> autoconf-archive currently try to install those two m4-related files, > >> doing the above pretty much *assures* an installation conflict, > >> ...

Re: [oe] proper way to report(?) conflicting files being installed?

2020-03-19 Thread Robert P. J. Day
On Thu, 19 Mar 2020, Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 01:09:13PM -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > On Thu, 19 Mar 2020, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > > > > On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 09:22:54AM -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > > >... > > > > +# ax_code_coverage.m4 and

[oe] [meta-oe][PATCH v3] crash: fix crash-cross build on x86_64

2020-03-19 Thread Goran Cengic
Remove -m32 from CFLAGS even for -cross recipe. Also remove ${GDB_CONF_FLAGS} from GDB_TARGET variable (that is passed to the gdb configuration) since the use of GDB_CONF_FLAGS is removed by 0001-cross_add_configure_option.patch. Signed-off-by: Goran Cengic ---

[oe] [meta-oe][PATCH v2] crash: fix crash-cross build on x86_64

2020-03-19 Thread Goran Čengić
>From 3246fc2c813531a6f279e4d4a2071e8af35bdcf5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Goran Cengic Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2020 00:11:52 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] crash: fix crash-cross build on x86_64 Remove -m32 from CFLAGS even for -cross recipe. Also remove ${GDB_CONF_FLAGS} from GDB_TARGET variable (that is

Re: [oe] proper way to report(?) conflicting files being installed?

2020-03-19 Thread Ross Burton
On 19/03/2020 17:32, Adrian Bunk wrote: this does seem backwards ... if both gnome-common and autoconf-archive currently try to install those two m4-related files, doing the above pretty much *assures* an installation conflict, ... No, --with-autoconf-archive makes gnome-common not install

[oe] [meta-oe][PATCH] crash: fix crash-cross build on x86_64

2020-03-19 Thread Goran Čengić
Remove -m32 from CFLAGS even for -cross recipe. Also remove ${GDB_CONF_FLAGS} from GDB_TARGET variable (that is passed to the gdb configuration) since the use of GDB_CONF_FLAGS is removed by 0001-cross_add_configure_option.patch. Signed-off-by: Goran Cengic ---

Re: [oe] proper way to report(?) conflicting files being installed?

2020-03-19 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 01:09:13PM -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > On Thu, 19 Mar 2020, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > > On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 09:22:54AM -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > >... > > > +# ax_code_coverage.m4 and ax_check_enable_debug.m4 are in gnome-common > > > only > > > +# because

Re: [oe] proper way to report(?) conflicting files being installed?

2020-03-19 Thread Robert P. J. Day
On Thu, 19 Mar 2020, Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 09:22:54AM -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > >... > > +# ax_code_coverage.m4 and ax_check_enable_debug.m4 are in gnome-common only > > +# because older versions of autoconf-archive didn't have them yet. Now they > > +# are in

Re: [oe] Mailing list platform change March 20th

2020-03-19 Thread Michael Halstead
Everything is proceeding smoothly and this work will continue as planned. The migration starts at noon PDT tomorrow. List owners please take care of all outstanding moderation in the next 24 hours to ensure a smooth transition. Thank you, -- Michael Halstead Linux Foundation / Yocto Project

Re: [oe] proper way to report(?) conflicting files being installed?

2020-03-19 Thread Robert P. J. Day
On Thu, 19 Mar 2020, Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 09:22:54AM -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > >... > > +# ax_code_coverage.m4 and ax_check_enable_debug.m4 are in gnome-common only > > +# because older versions of autoconf-archive didn't have them yet. Now they > > +# are in

Re: [oe] proper way to report(?) conflicting files being installed?

2020-03-19 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 09:22:54AM -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote: >... > +# ax_code_coverage.m4 and ax_check_enable_debug.m4 are in gnome-common only > +# because older versions of autoconf-archive didn't have them yet. Now they > +# are in autoconf-archive from OE-core. We depend on that below to

[oe] [meta-oe][PATCH] libev: upgrade 4.31 -> 4.33

2020-03-19 Thread Pierre-Jean Texier via Openembedded-devel
The complete Changes since 4.31 are: 4.33 Wed Mar 18 13:22:29 CET 2020 - the 4.31 timerfd code wrongly changed the priority of the signal fd watcher, which is usually harmless unless signal fds are also used (found via cpan tester service). - the documentation

[oe] proper way to report(?) conflicting files being installed?

2020-03-19 Thread Robert P. J. Day
long story short, colleague was adding packages to a build and ran into error wherein both of: * autoconf-archive * gnome-common were trying to install a couple identical m4-related files. some quick googling produced this: https://patchwork.openembedded.org/patch/142467/ with the

Re: [oe] [zeus 00/13] Patch review

2020-03-19 Thread Khem Raj
look On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 7:58 PM Armin Kuster wrote: > > Here is the next set for meta-openembedded. > Please have reviews back by Friday. > > The following changes since commit bb65c27a772723dfe2c15b5e1b27bcc1a1ed884c: > > fluentbit: Fix packaging in multilib env (2020-01-30 18:38:10

Re: [oe] [PATCH 4/5] networkmanager-openvpn: Make PACKAGECONFIG gnome work

2020-03-19 Thread Khem Raj
On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 1:17 AM Andreas Müller wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 5:14 AM Khem Raj wrote: > > > > On Wed, Mar 18, 2020 at 1:45 PM Andreas Müller > > wrote: > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Andreas Müller > > > --- > > > .../networkmanager/networkmanager-openvpn_1.8.12.bb | 13

Re: [oe] [PATCH 4/5] networkmanager-openvpn: Make PACKAGECONFIG gnome work

2020-03-19 Thread Andreas Müller
On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 5:14 AM Khem Raj wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 18, 2020 at 1:45 PM Andreas Müller > wrote: > > > > Signed-off-by: Andreas Müller > > --- > > .../networkmanager/networkmanager-openvpn_1.8.12.bb | 13 - > > 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > >