From: Robert Yang
* Remove 0001-Support-Atomic-ops-on-clang.patch because of:
commit 54605b8a5807fe893a4b9ff8def982a264cdc6c9
Author: Aliaksey Kandratsenka
Date: Wed Jun 21 10:39:18 2023 -0400
amputate old atomic ops implementation
* Remove sgidef.patch because of:
commit e7823
License-Update: Update copyright years to 2024
ChangeLog:
https://github.com/OpenVPN/openvpn/blob/v2.6.10/Changes.rst
Security fixes:
CVE-2024-27459: Windows: fix a possible stack overflow in the
interactive service component which might lead to a local privilege
escalation.
CVE-2024-24974: Win
ChangeLog:
https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/releases/tag/v9.0.0
* Refresh patches.
* Drop backport patch.
Signed-off-by: Yi Zhao
---
...-missing-includes-cstdint-and-cstdio.patch | 70 ---
...1-cmake-Add-check-for-atomic-support.patch | 13 +++-
...-with-new-atomic-builtin-eq
From: Soumya Sambu
Fixes CVE-2023-50387 and CVE-2023-50868
Remove backported CVE patch.
Remove patch for lua as hardcoding lua version was removed.
Changelog:
===
https://thekelleys.org.uk/dnsmasq/CHANGELOG
Signed-off-by: Soumya Sambu
---
.../recipes-support/dnsmasq/dnsmasq.inc
> -Original Message-
> From: Marek Vasut
> Sent: den 18 mars 2024 23:00
> To: Christophe Chapuis
> Cc: Peter Kjellerstedt ; openembedded-
> de...@lists.openembedded.org; Khem Raj ; Fabio Estevam
>
> Subject: Re: [oe] [meta-oe][PATCH v4 7/7] lvgl: lv-conf.inc: generalize
> sed instruction
The python3-dbus package was removed in (dac933e). While the upstream
project isn't active, other distributions (e.g. Fedora, Debian, etc)
continue to offer the package and apply patches to resolve reported issues.
While other packages offer similar functionality (e.g. dasbus), they are not
drop
Would the new license scheme described here:
https://redis.com/blog/redis-adopts-dual-source-available-licensing/
prevent us from accepting the 7.4 release? I suspect it should but I
need more time to
read the new terms.
../Randy
On 2024-01-30 1:23 p.m., Martin Jansa via lists.openembedded.
On Thu, Mar 21, 2024 at 5:55 PM Randy MacLeod via
lists.openembedded.org
wrote:
>
> Would the new license scheme described here:
>
> https://redis.com/blog/redis-adopts-dual-source-available-licensing/
>
> prevent us from accepting the 7.4 release? I suspect it should but I need
> more time to
>
On Thu, Mar 21, 2024 at 5:55 PM Randy MacLeod via lists.openembedded.org
wrote:
> Would the new license scheme described here:
>
> https://redis.com/blog/redis-adopts-dual-source-available-licensing/
>
> prevent us from accepting the 7.4 release? I suspect it should but I need
> more time to
> re
The patches are taken from Fedora, and so aren't backports. Should be
marked Inactive-Upstream rather.
I would only add it back if it has real consumers or use cases that
can't be fulfilled by maintained alternatives. Otherwise, anyone can
carry it privately,
Alex
On Thu, 21 Mar 2024 at 23:18, D
The packageconfig for x11 doesn't seem to be enough to disable x11
when it's not in DISTRO_FEATURES.
CMake Error at
TOPDIR/BUILD/work/raspberrypi4_64-oe-linux/freerdp3/3.4.0/recipe-sysroot-native/usr/share/cmake-3.28/Modules/FindPackageHandleStandardArgs.cmake:230
(message):
Could NOT find X11
11 matches
Mail list logo