Hi Thomas,
Thomas De Schampheleire wrote,
Hi Waldemar,
Waldemar Brodkorb w...@uclibc-ng.org schreef:
Hello Embedded Linux Hackers,
Interesting development! One question: how do you see musl vs
uclibc-ng in the future? At this moment uclibc supports more
architectures, but this may
Hi Sedat,
Sedat Dilek wrote,
On Sun, Jul 20, 2014 at 9:13 PM, Waldemar Brodkorb w...@uclibc-ng.org wrote:
Hello Embedded Linux Hackers,
it seems there is no plan to release a new uClibc version.
The current maintainer does not response on any public or private mails
about a plan to do
Hi Florian,
Florian Fainelli wrote,
To speak my mind, I think uClibc has no future in the next 2 or 3
years, musl is a much more active project, with multiple embedded
projects starting to use it, on the other end, (e)glibc has remedied
its own problems and its useful again.
I am on your
Hello Embedded Linux Hackers,
it seems there is no plan to release a new uClibc version.
The current maintainer does not response on any public or private mails
about a plan to do a needed release. Therefore most of you carrying a lot
of patches against uClibc 0.9.33.2 to make it work in your
