On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 10:42:30PM +, Phil Blundell wrote:
>If you're primarily worried about case (a) then building two copies of
>the frontend which share a common libbusybox, one setuid and one not,
>probably is a reasonable thing to do. However, as you say, busybox does
>already have a fa
On Fri, 2010-02-26 at 23:26 +0100, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
> SUID_DROP applets do just that before the individual applet_main is called,
> i.e. drops privs. But whatever..
> If you really think you want to build the thing twice then i'd try
> FEATURE_SHARED_BUSYBOX, fyi.
> $ size 0_lib/{bus
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 12:21:56PM -0800, C Michael Sundius wrote:
>On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 10:20 AM, Koen Kooi wrote:
>
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> On 26-02-10 16:43, Mike Westerhof wrote:
>> > Tom Rini wrote:
>> >> I was about to just push this and I noticed that a n
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 10:20 AM, Koen Kooi wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 26-02-10 16:43, Mike Westerhof wrote:
> > Tom Rini wrote:
> >> I was about to just push this and I noticed that a number of
> >> distributions (SlugOS, Angstrom, Kaelios, micro) currently se
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 26-02-10 16:43, Mike Westerhof wrote:
> Tom Rini wrote:
>> I was about to just push this and I noticed that a number of
>> distributions (SlugOS, Angstrom, Kaelios, micro) currently set
>> FEATURE_SUID=y, but it's not actually install SUID. And sin
Tom Rini wrote:
> I was about to just push this and I noticed that a number of
> distributions (SlugOS, Angstrom, Kaelios, micro) currently set
> FEATURE_SUID=y, but it's not actually install SUID. And since I recall
> some way-back-when's of "busybox SUID is dangerous / crap!", I thought
> it bes
On Wed, 2010-02-24 at 11:19 +0100, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote:
> Dnia wtorek, 23 lutego 2010 o 20:02:56 Tom Rini napisał(a):
> > I was about to just push this and I noticed that a number of
> > distributions (SlugOS, Angstrom, Kaelios, micro) currently set
> > FEATURE_SUID=y, but it's not actually in
Dnia wtorek, 23 lutego 2010 o 20:02:56 Tom Rini napisał(a):
> I was about to just push this and I noticed that a number of
> distributions (SlugOS, Angstrom, Kaelios, micro) currently set
> FEATURE_SUID=y, but it's not actually install SUID. And since I recall
> some way-back-when's of "busybox SU
On Tue, 2010-02-23 at 23:52 +0100, Michael 'Mickey' Lauer wrote:
> Ah, finally someone does something about it. Next step would be to dump
> tinylogin which is known broken and use busyboxes login utilities
> instead.
Not wanting to open that can of worms up just yet, yes, this will let
distros o
Ah, finally someone does something about it. Next step would be to dump
tinylogin which is known broken and use busyboxes login utilities
instead.
Great work, Tom.
:M:
___
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
ht
On Tue, 2010-02-23 at 12:02 -0700, Tom Rini wrote:
> + if grep -q "CONFIG_FEATURE_SUID=y" ${WORKDIR}/defconfig; then
> + install -m 4755 ${S}/busybox ${D}${base_bindir}
> + else
> + install -m 0755 ${S}/busybox ${D}${base_bindir}
> + fi
Looks good to me.
p.
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 1:14 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-02-23 at 11:51 -0800, Khem Raj wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 11:02 AM, Tom Rini wrote:
> > > I was about to just push this and I noticed that a number of
> > > distributions (SlugOS, Angstrom, Kaelios, micro) currently set
> >
On Tue, 2010-02-23 at 11:51 -0800, Khem Raj wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 11:02 AM, Tom Rini wrote:
> > I was about to just push this and I noticed that a number of
> > distributions (SlugOS, Angstrom, Kaelios, micro) currently set
> > FEATURE_SUID=y, but it's not actually install SUID. And si
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 11:02 AM, Tom Rini wrote:
> I was about to just push this and I noticed that a number of
> distributions (SlugOS, Angstrom, Kaelios, micro) currently set
> FEATURE_SUID=y, but it's not actually install SUID. And since I recall
> some way-back-when's of "busybox SUID is dan
I was about to just push this and I noticed that a number of
distributions (SlugOS, Angstrom, Kaelios, micro) currently set
FEATURE_SUID=y, but it's not actually install SUID. And since I recall
some way-back-when's of "busybox SUID is dangerous / crap!", I thought
it best to post the patch first
15 matches
Mail list logo
